Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lily Pointe Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$2.6MHuman Services$1.8MAnimals$175kEnvironment$175kRecreation & Sports$155kHousing & Shelter$85kEducation$65kScience & Tech$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $325k
  • $250k+2 grants · $750k
$50,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$8.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SWEDISH HOSPITAL$500,000
FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENTER$250,000
ENCOMPASS$75,000
HOPELINK$50,000
SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$50,000
WSU FOUNDATION$50,000
FATHER JOE'S VILLAGES$50,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$50,000
USA DIVING FOUNDATION$25,000
SEATTLE AQUARIUM$25,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT SAN DIEGO$15,000
THE RESCUE HOUSE$10,000
WOODLAND PARK ZOO$10,000
FORT LAUDERDALE DIVING BOOSTER CLUB$10,000
UPCHIEVE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $451k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MILLIONAIR CLUB: $10k → 9%HOPELINK: $57k → 9%HOPELINK: $50k → 9%HOPELINK: $50k → 9%HOPELINK: $50k → 9%HOPELINK: $50k → 9%HOPELINK: $50k → 9%HOPELINK: $45k → 9%HOPELINK: $45k → 9%HOPELINK: $43k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
NV
CA
CO
HI
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.0M · 18 repeat orgs$202k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +82% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
13

Total granted

$5.0M
$157k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
+21%

Still filing today

61%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthAnimalsHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EN
    ENCOMPASS NORTHWEST
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +151%
  • FH
    Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
    5× · 2021–2025 · $650k · revenue +169%
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $446k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • MP
    MAUI PREPARATORY ACADEMY
    one grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue -1%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +25%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Los Angelesgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +34%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
2
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
3
Seattle Children's Healthcare System

Seattle children's healthcare system (schs) is engaged in activities relating to the provision of health care services to infants, children, and adolescents, delivering and improving the delivery and the quality of those services through…

Health
4
Life Science Washington

Life science washington is a non-profit trade and professional association dedicated to promoting innovation and responsible growth in the life sciences and biomedical industries in the state of washington. promotion and education are…

5
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
6
Seattle Biomedical Research Institute

We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…

7
Mount Sinai Health System Inc

The mission of the mount sinai health system is to provide compassionate patient care with seamless coordination and to advance medicine through unrivaled education, research, and outreach in the many diverse communities we serve.

Human Services
8
Sacramento Zoological Society

The sacramento zoo inspires appreciation, respect and a connection with wildlife and nature through education, recreation and conservation.

Animals
9
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

10
Kaua'i Medical Clinic

Kaua'i medical clinic, an affliate of hawai'i pacific health, is a multi-specialty clinic dedicated to providing world-class care for adults and children across hawai'i and the pacific region in partnership with kapi'olani medical center…

Health
11
National Association of Children's Hospitals Inc

Nach supports children's hospitals by addressing public policy issues that affect their ability to fulfill their missions to serve children and their families. nach fulfills its mission and vision through federal advocacy, collaboration…

12
Seattle Children's Guild Association

Seattle children's guild association advocates for seattle children's hospital through volunteer, philanthropic and community endeavors to ensure hope, excellent care and advanced cures for children.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Children's Hospital and the most unlike its peers is Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%4%<5yr14%13%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr18%26%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr15%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%3%<5yr14%1%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr18%56%20–35yr13%36%35–55yr15%5%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%
1/24
the rest of the field
12%
4,745/38,944

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
15/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ENCOMPASS NORTHWEST — $1,258,384 · OtherENCOMPASS NORTHWESTSWEDISH HOSPITAL — $1,100,000 · OtherSWEDISH HOSPITALWSU FOUNDATION — $150,000 · OtherUSA DIVING FOUNDATION — $125,000 · Other+14 more — $223,119 · Other+14 moreFred Hutchinson Cancer Center — $650,000 · HealthFred Hutchinson Cancer CenterALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $445,635 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED …SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $244,999 · HealthSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL+2 more — $40,000 · HealthHOPELINK — $440,926 · Human ServicesHOPELINK+1 more — $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIETY — $174,810 · AnimalsWET NOSES RESCUE — $95,000 · AnimalsWOODLAND PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $75,000 · Animals+1 more — $1,000 · AnimalsST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC — $75,000 · ReligionFUZZY FRIENDS RESCUE — $3,000 · ReligionMAUI PREPARATORY ACADEMY — $40,000 · EducationUPCHIEVE INC — $10,000 · EducationPACIFIC SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION — $35,000 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL SWIMMING HALL OF FAME — $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,856,503Health$1,380,634Human Services$450,926Animals$345,810Religion$78,000Education$50,000Arts & Culture$45,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetENCOMPASS NORTHWEST — $1,258,384 over 9y, 6.4% of budgetFred Hutchinson Cancer Center — $650,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $445,635 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHOPELINK — $440,926 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $244,999 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIETY — $174,810 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetWET NOSES RESCUE — $95,000 over 3y, 64% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC — $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOODLAND PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $75,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDHAVEN — $55,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMAUI PREPARATORY ACADEMY — $40,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPACIFIC SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION — $35,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA SHARE USA INC — $17,119 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetUPLIFT NORTHWEST — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SWIMMING HALL OF FAME — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE J A Y C FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFUZZY FRIENDS RESCUE — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ENCOMPASS NORTHWEST
  • Who funds Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds HOPELINK
  • Who funds SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
  • Who funds THE SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIETY
  • Who funds WET NOSES RESCUE
  • Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC
  • Who funds WOODLAND PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds CHILDHAVEN
  • Who funds MAUI PREPARATORY ACADEMY
  • Who funds PACIFIC SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles
  • Who funds AMERICA SHARE USA INC
  • Who funds UPLIFT NORTHWEST
  • Who funds MAUI FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL SWIMMING HALL OF FAME
  • Who funds THE J A Y C FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds UPCHIEVE INC
  • Who funds FUZZY FRIENDS RESCUE
  • Who funds EAST MAUI ANIMAL REFUGE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA10.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lily Pointe Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lily Pointe Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Lily Pointe Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph