Skip to content

· Public charity

Lila H Borgstrom Foundation

The foundation is exclusively for charitable and educational purposes, whose purposes include, without limitation, providing grants and making distributions to organizations that qualify as exempt organizations under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code.

$128k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$383k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COVENANT HOUSE ILLINOIS$10,000
MERCY HOME FOR BOYS & GIRLS$10,000
CANCER FOR COLLEGE$10,000
HAVEN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES$10,000
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$10,000
CRADLES TO CRAYONS$10,000
HEARTS TO ART CAMP$10,000
NOCC TEAL TOTE$10,000
SHRINERS CHILDREN'S CHICAGO$10,000
BIG SHOULDERS FUND$10,000
CULINARY CARE$7,000
RUBY'S RAINBOW$7,000
CAMP KIDS ARE KIDS CHICAGO$7,000
BY THE HAND CLUB FOR KIDS$7,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HAVEN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE ILLINOIS: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
2
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
3
Cog Research Foundation Llc

Cog research foundation, llc is a california 501(c)(3) entity founded in 2024 and designed to become the federal grantee organization for the children's oncology group (cog). the cog, a member of the national cancer institute (nci)…

Health
4
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
5
Christmas Without Cancer Nfp

Christmas without cancer identifies need and then provides gifts and basic necessities to chicagoland families who have members stricken with cancer so to allow the beauty of christmas to shine through while family members find comfort in…

Health
6
Cancer Research and Biostatistics

To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.

Health
7
City of Hope National Medical Center

City of Hope National Medical Center's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
8
Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute

To make all childhood cancers universally survivable by delivering new treatments to clinical trials through scientific discovery.

—
9
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

—
10
The Children's Cancer Cause Inc

The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.

Health
11
American Cancer Society Inc

Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.

Health
12
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Shoulders Fund; the most unlike its peers is Ruby's Rainbow. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
2/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CANCER FOR COLLEGE: $10,000 · HealthCANCER FOR COLLEGENATIONAL OVARIAN CANCER COALITION INC: $10,000 · HealthNATIONAL OVARIAN CANCER CO…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $10,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHI…CREATIVE ARTS INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureCREATIVE ARTS INCCOVENANT HOUSE ILLINOIS INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE IL…Charity Navigator: $10,000 · Human ServicesCharity NavigatorBig Shoulders Fund: $10,000 · EducationBig Shoulders F…RUBY'S RAINBOW: $7,000 · EducationRUBY'S RAINBOWGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $10,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER CHICAGO…Culinary Care: $7,000 · Food & NutritionCulinary CareMISSION OF OUR LADY OF MERCY: $10,000 · OtherMISSION OF OUR …By The Hand Club For Kids: $7,000 · OtherBy The Hand Clu…CAMP KIDS ARE KIDS CHICAGO: $7,000 · Recreation & Sports
Health$30,000Arts & Culture$20,000Human Services$20,000Education$17,000Food & Nutrition$17,000Other$17,000Recreation & Sports$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCREATIVE ARTS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetCANCER FOR COLLEGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE ILLINOIS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBig Shoulders Fund: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCharity Navigator: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL OVARIAN CANCER COALITION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCulinary Care: $7,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBy The Hand Club For Kids: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP KIDS ARE KIDS CHICAGO: $7,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetRUBY'S RAINBOW: $7,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL12.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lila H Borgstrom Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lila H Borgstrom Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lila H Borgstrom’s filings →

More from the funding graph