Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lightening the Load

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$610k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$1.8MFood & Nutrition$540kHuman Services$438kEducation$428kPhilanthropy$240kInternational$80kHousing & Shelter$20kYouth Development$10k
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $130k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $468k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA$200,000
COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE$75,000
PHILABUNDANCE$70,000
TRAVIS MANION FOUNDATION$62,500
PHILADELPHIA EDUCATION FUND$60,000
WCU FOUNDATION$45,000
MELMARK$25,000
WEST CHESTER AREA SENIOR CENTER$20,000
CARE$20,000
FRIENDS ASSOCIATION FOR CARE OF CHILD$10,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$10,000
ST JAMES SCHOOL$7,500
MIB AGENTS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $240k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF BUCKS COUNTY: $5k → 6%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF BUCKS COUNTY: $5k → 6%FRIENDS ASSOCIATION FOR CARE & PROTECTION OF CHILDREN: $10k → 6%FRIENDS ASSOCIATION FOR CARE & PROTECTION OF CHILDREN: $10k → 6%WEST CHESTER AREA SENIOR CENTER: $20k → 6%WEST CHESTER AREA SENIOR CENTER: $10k → 6%WEST CHESTER AREA SENIOR CENTER: $10k → 6%WEST CHESTER AREA SENIOR CENTER: $10k → 6%WEST CHESTER AREA SENIOR CENTER: $5k → 6%WEST CHESTER AREA SENIOR CENTER: $5k → 6%MELMARK: $25k → 6%MELMARK: $25k → 6%MELMARK: $25k → 6%MELMARK: $25k → 6%MELMARK: $25k → 6%MELMARK: $25k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 17 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
3

Total granted

$3.4M
$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+31%

Still filing today

76%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentInternationalFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +59%
  • Philabundance
    6× · 2019–2024 · $530k · revenue +83%
  • CV
    COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $395k · revenue +124%

Funded once

  • CF
    CCSA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +18%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PHILADELPHIA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +51%
  • BF
    Bread For The World Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +31%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
2
Philhaven

Philhaven promotes hope, healing and wholeness through the provision of behavioral resources.

Health
3
Chambersburg Hospital

The chambersburg hospital is a regional non-profit health care organization committed to the improvement of the health and well-being of the people in southcentral pennsylvania.

Health
4
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
5
The Children's Institute of Pittsburgh

To heal. to teach. to empower. to amaze.

Education
6
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
7
Stc Healthcare Partners Llc

Website: https://towerhealth.org/locations/st-christophers-hospital- children stc opco, llc (st. christopher's hospital for children) provides a full range of high-quality healthcare services to all children and youth up to age 21 who seek…

Health
8
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
9
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
10
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
11
Children First Pa

Summary

Human Services
12
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Philabundance; the most unlike its peers is Mib Agents Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $1,171,667 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIACOMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $395,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE+1 more: $15,000 · HealthPhilabundance: $530,000 · Food & NutritionPhilabundanceWCU FOUNDATION: $240,000 · OtherWCU FOUNDAT…FRIENDS ASSOCIATN FOR CARE OF CHILD: $40,000 · OtherFRIENDS ASS…ST JAMES SCHOOL: $30,000 · OtherST JAMES SC…ESPERANZA: $20,000 · OtherESPERANZASMILE TRAIN INC: $20,000 · OtherSMILE TRAIN…+2 more: $20,000 · Other+2 moreTHE PHILADELPHIA EDUCATION FUND: $347,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE PHILADE…+1 more: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentTravis Manion Foundation: $297,500 · PhilanthropyTravis Ma…MELMARK INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesWEST CHESTER AREA SENIOR CENTER: $60,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS ASSOCIATION FOR THE CARE AND PRO: $20,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF BUCKS COUNTY: $10,000 · Human ServicesCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $40,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $40,000 · InternationalCCSA FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Education
Health$1,581,667Food & Nutrition$530,000Other$370,000Youth Development$357,500Philanthropy$297,500Human Services$240,000International$80,000Education$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $1,171,667 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPhilabundance: $530,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $395,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetTHE PHILADELPHIA EDUCATION FUND: $347,500 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetTravis Manion Foundation: $297,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetMELMARK INC: $150,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWEST CHESTER AREA SENIOR CENTER: $60,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS ASSOCIATION FOR THE CARE AND PRO: $20,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMIB AGENTS INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF BUCKS COUNTY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PHILADELPHIA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBread For The World Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds Philabundance ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILADELPHIA EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds Travis Manion Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MELMARK INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST CHESTER AREA SENIOR CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CCSA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS ASSOCIATION FOR THE CARE AND PRO ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds MIB AGENTS INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF BUCKS COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Bread For The World Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia FoundationPA17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · The Leo and Peggy Pierce Family Foundation Inc · The Gordon Charter Foundation · W W Smith Charitable Trust · Connelly Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lightening the Load funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lightening the Load. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lightening the Load?

    Find your warmest path to Lightening the Load through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lightening the Load’s filings →

    More from the funding graph