Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Lids Foundation Inc

The lids foundation provides support directly to local communities and to the charitable organizations that serve them to enable community members of all ages to live more active, healthy, and productive lives.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$175k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$933kRecreation & Sports$778kPhilanthropy$641kEducation$394kYouth Development$210kHousing & Shelter$146kEnvironment$91kHuman Services$83kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 19 grants below total $896,728 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,095,048 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $198,320 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $173k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $716k
$25,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OUR MILITARY KIDS INC$175,000
COVENANT HOUSE$116,000
EVERY KIDS SPORTS$100,000
SEA OF TREES$75,000
JUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC$75,000
WHALER NATION INC$62,992
KABOOM$62,500
GOOD SPORTS INC$50,000
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$30,436
ASIEL FOUNDATION$25,000
ADA BOOSTER CLUB$20,000
OPPORTUNITY ENTERPRISES INC$20,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF OK CITY$16,500
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$15,500
LIFT INC$15,300
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $280k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LITTLE WISH FOUNDATION: $10k → 5%THE JACKSON CENTER: $10k → 9%A KID AGAIN: $8k → 15%COVENANT HOUSE: $116k → 17%LITTLE WISH FOUNDATION: $8k → 5%LITTLE WISH FOUNDATION: $128k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 13 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
44

Total granted

$1.7M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+6%

Still filing today

77%
66%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $469k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentHealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OM
    OUR MILITARY KIDS INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $460k · revenue +55%
  • EK
    Every Kid Sports
    2× · 2023–2024 · $150k · revenue +947%
  • KI
    KABOOM INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $138k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • CR
    CAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $204k · revenue +4%
  • N1
    NINE 13 INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $150k · revenue +46%
  • AS
    AUTISM SPEAKS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -46%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Perfect Play Athletics Foundation
—
2
Complete Playground Inc

Complete playground is a nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing inclusive child, teen, and family development by bringing together neurodivergent and neurotypical children, teenagers, and their families in a shared environment of…

Recreation & Sports
3
Harlem Rbi Inc

Harlem rbi,inc dba dream provides youth with opportunities to play, learn, and grow. our mission is to level the field by empowering all children to recognize their potential and realize their dreams.

Philanthropy
4
Team Impact Inc

Team impact is the only u.s. nonprofit that tackles the emotional trauma and social isolation experienced by children facing serious and chronic illnesses by matching them with a college athletic team. because no child should be sidelined…

Philanthropy
5
Build Our Ballpark Inc

To improve the lives of kids by providing the opportunity to play baseball and softball which, through teamwork, strengthens character, builds pride and teaches skills for life.

Recreation & Sports
6
The Hyland Hills Junior Hockey Association

Become ambassadors of youth hockey while developing players to reach their maximum potential. have respect and love for the game while acting with integrity, fairness, and honesty.

—
7
Koa Sports League Inc

Koa is committed to shaping kids' lives through sports. through the following approach, koa aims to develop each child to his or her full potential as an athlete and a person: - employing trained and dedicated professional coaches and…

Recreation & Sports
8
Young Athlete Foundation
Youth Development
9
Children's National

Children's national coordinates the overall policy and activities of the affiliated organizations. see schedule o.

Health
10
New Heights Youth Inc

To educate and empower promising underserved youth to be leaders, champions and student-athletes by developing the skills necessary for success in high school, college and life.

Youth Development
11
Mlb-Mlbpa Youth Development Foundation
Recreation & Sports
12
Girls Incorporated of Greater Indianapolis

Girls inc.'s mission is to inspire all girls to be strong, smart, and bold. in partnership with schools and community organizations, we focus on the development of the whole girl. she learns to value herself, take risks, and discover and…

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Good Sports Inc and the most unlike its peers is New Era Cap Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Sports ProgramsHealth Access Advocacy and …Youth Development CentersChristian Youth CampsVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Jewish Community Organizati…Cancer Support ServicesIndependent K-12 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%33%10–20yr16%37%20–35yr13%8%35–55yr16%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%5%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%30%10–20yr16%53%20–35yr13%6%35–55yr16%2%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 6% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
6%
4/63
the rest of the field
13%
240,392/1,819,502

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/52
Grantees still filing
31/52
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Every Kid Sports — $150,000 · Recreation & SportsEvery Kid SportsNINE 13 INC — $150,000 · Recreation & SportsNINE 13 INCKABOOM INC — $137,500 · Recreation & SportsKABOOM INCWHALER NATION INC — $62,992 · Recreation & SportsWHALER NATION INCPROJECT BACKBOARD — $29,000 · Recreation & SportsWASHINGTON LITTLE CAPITALS INC — $25,000 · Recreation & SportsPLAYSMART INC — $25,000 · Recreation & Sports+7 more — $80,122 · Recreation & Sports+7 moreHOPE FOR HENRY FOUNDATION — $250,000 · HealthHOPE FOR HENRY FOUN…SIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $215,500 · HealthSIBLEY MEMORIAL HOS…AUTISM SPEAKS INC — $100,000 · HealthAUTISM SPEAKS INC+2 more — $15,000 · HealthDOUBLE Q FOUNDATION — $111,000 · OtherDOUBLE Q FOUNDATIONCity of Manchester NH-Department of Health — $72,920 · OtherCity of Manchester NH-Depart…THE ARC — $50,000 · OtherTHE ARCPROJECT FIT AMERICA — $47,455 · OtherPROJECT FIT AMERICAMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $30,436 · OtherJOINED FOR GOOD INC DBA BRACKETS FOR GOOD — $30,000 · OtherTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · OtherTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH F…SEAS OF TREES — $91,000 · OtherSEAS OF TREESFamily Promise of Greater Indianapolis Inc — $30,000 · Other+26 more — $288,989 · Other+26 moreOUR MILITARY KIDS INC — $460,000 · PhilanthropyOUR MILITARY KID…NEW ERA CAP FOUNDATION — $40,000 · PhilanthropyNEW ERA CAP FOUN…CAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION INC — $204,000 · EducationCAL RIPKEN …Harbour School Foundation Inc — $75,000 · EducationHarbour Sch…JUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC — $75,000 · EducationJUMPSTART F…LITTLE WISH FOUNDATION INC — $145,582 · Human ServicesLITTLE WI…COVENANT HOUSE — $116,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT …JACKSON CENTER FOR CONDUCTIVE EDUCATION — $10,000 · Human Services+1 more — $8,100 · Human ServicesTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METROPOLITAN BALTIMORE — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS ON THE RUN INTERNATIONAL INC — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentGOOD SPORTS INC — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC — $16,500 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentTEAM MARYLAND ICE HOCKEY ORGANIZATION INC — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentGOTR OF HAMILTON COUNTY — $7,500 · Youth Development
Recreation & Sports$659,614Health$580,500Other$851,800Philanthropy$500,000Education$354,000Human Services$279,682Youth Development$219,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOUR MILITARY KIDS INC — $460,000 over 4y, 6.5% of budgetHOPE FOR HENRY FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetSIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $215,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetCAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION INC — $204,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEvery Kid Sports — $150,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetNINE 13 INC — $150,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetLITTLE WISH FOUNDATION INC — $145,582 over 3y, 32% of budgetKABOOM INC — $137,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — $116,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEAS OF TREES — $91,000 over 2y, 95% of budgetHarbour School Foundation Inc — $75,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetJUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC — $75,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWHALER NATION INC — $62,992 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METROPOLITAN BALTIMORE — $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN INTERNATIONAL INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGOOD SPORTS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPROJECT FIT AMERICA — $47,455 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetNEW ERA CAP FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $30,436 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Promise of Greater Indianapolis Inc — $30,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetJOINED FOR GOOD INC DBA BRACKETS FOR GOOD — $30,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPROJECT BACKBOARD — $29,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetASIEL FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON LITTLE CAPITALS INC — $25,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetPLAYSMART INC — $25,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetINDIANAPOLIS YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetOPPORTUNITY ENTERPRISES INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC — $16,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIFT INC — $15,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJOSH GIBSON FOUNDATION — $12,540 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetJACKSON CENTER FOR CONDUCTIVE EDUCATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMISHAWAKA PARKS & RECREATION FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN NEW ENGLAND INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM MARYLAND ICE HOCKEY ORGANIZATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSt Albans School Endowment Fund — $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetA KID AGAIN INC — $8,100 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHAPPY HOLLOW CAMP INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGOTR OF HAMILTON COUNTY — $7,500 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK — $6,124 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILLION MEAL MOVEMENT INC — $5,200 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS POST 3838 — $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE TATUM PARKER PROJECT INC — $5,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetPATHWAYS OF HOPE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Indiana Commu…Lilly Endowment IncMore Than a Phone IncNational Basketball P…Dick's Sporting Goods…Ge Aerospace Foundati…Enterprise Holdings F…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Charities Aid Foundat…The Bank of America C…Morgan Stanley Global…Natl Christian Charit…
Central Indiana Community Foundation IncIN18× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · More Than a Phone Inc · National Basketball Players Association Foundation · Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lids Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc — 12% of income from government
  • The Boys and Girls Clubs of Metropolitan Baltimore — 2% of income from government
  • The Baseball Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lids Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Lids Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home