Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lewis-Clark Valley Healthcare Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
76
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$92k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$3.1MFood & Nutrition$1.1MHuman Services$1.1MYouth Development$673kHousing & Shelter$504kPublic Safety & Disaster$389kPhilanthropy$270kRecreation & Sports$239kOther$0
02FY2025 · 76 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k34 grants · $163k
  • $10k–50k34 grants · $452k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $588k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Family Promise of the Palouse$91,776
LC Valley Youth Resource Center Inc$85,000
Snake River Community Clinic$84,000
Upriver Youth Leadership Council In$82,824
The Idaho Foodbank$70,000
Interlink Inc$64,400
Community Health Association of Spo$60,000
St Vincent de Paul Society$50,000
CRAIGMONT QUICK RESPONSE RESCUE UNI$40,000
Sojourners Alliance$30,000
Family Promise of the LC Valley$25,000
CIRCLES OF CARING ADULT DAY HEALTH$25,000
VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER$25,000
First Christian Church$25,000
ROSALIA VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS ASSO$12,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $514k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Family Promise of the Palouse: $92k → 16%WALLA WALLA SENIOR CENTER: $10k → 13%Clearwater County Senior Citizens I: $10k → 15%Clearwater County Senior Citizens I: $10k → 15%CREATING MEMORIES FOR DISABLED CHIL: $10k → 12%HOMES OF HOPE: $41k → 16%THE COUNCIL ON AGING AND HUMAN SERV: $10k → 20%Building Healthy Families: $10k → 12%Clearwater County Senior Citizens I: $8k → 15%COUNCIL ON AGING AND HUMAN SERVICES: $10k → 20%CREATING MEMORIES FOR DISABLED CHIL: $10k → 12%VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 16%THE COUNCIL ON AGING AND HUMAN SERV: $6k → 20%MOSCOW CONTEMPORARY: $10k → 16%HOMES OF HOPE: $10k → 16%Family Promise of the Palouse: $10k → 16%MOSCOW CONTEMPORARY: $8k → 16%Building Healthy Families: $8k → 12%KAMIAH SENIOR CITIZENS SOCIETY: $8k → 13%HOMES OF HOPE: $10k → 16%THE COUNCIL ON AGING AND HUMAN SERV: $3k → 20%Kamiah Senior Citizens Society: $5k → 13%Friendly Neighbors Senior Citizens: $6k → 16%Family Promise of the Palouse: $6k → 16%HOMES OF HOPE: $10k → 16%Community Action Partnership: $25k → 11%Friendly Neighbors Senior Citizens: $5k → 16%Friendly Neighbors Senior Citizens: $5k → 16%Friendly Neighbors Senior Citizens: $5k → 16%PANDION INSTITUTE: $3k → 12%Valley Community Center: $10k → 16%Friendly Neighbors Senior Citizens: $5k → 16%YWCA of Lewiston-Clarkston: $12k → 11%Friendly Neighbors Senior Citizens: $4k → 16%Friendly Neighbors Senior Citizens: $3k → 16%Friendly Neighbors Senior Citizens: $500 → 16%VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $8k → 16%Senior Citizens Dollar a Month Nutr: $10k → 13%VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $6k → 16%FRIENDS OF COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $5k → 20%Senior Citizens Dollar a Month Nutr: $10k → 13%VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $6k → 16%Senior Citizens Dollar a Month Nutr: $10k → 13%Valley Community Center: $6k → 16%Homes of Hope Inc: $5k → 16%NAMI IDAHO: $10k → 11%NAMI IDAHO: $10k → 11%NAMI IDAHO: $7k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Lewis-Clark Valley Healthcare Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 64% of the giving stays in ID; by stated purpose, 61%.

Lewis-Clark Valley Healthcare Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.8M · 103 repeat orgs$2.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

103 repeat relationships: 40 still active in FY2025, 63 since wound down; 31 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

103
119

Total granted

$5.8M
$1.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+7%

Still filing today

42%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $245k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LV
    LC VALLEY YOUTH RESOURCE CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $434k · revenue +74% · 25% of their budget
  • IF
    IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE
    6× · 2019–2025 · $355k · revenue +35%
  • II
    INTERLINK INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $338k · revenue +140% · 41% of their budget

Funded once

  • CH
    CHAS Health
    one grant, 2020 · $110k
  • PH
    Public Health Idaho North Central D
    one grant, 2019 · $84k
  • SP
    Suicide Prevention of the Inland No
    one grant, 2023 · $80k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
2
Gem County Senior Community Center Corporation

To provide nutritious meals and social activities at the center as well as home delivered meals and transportation for seniors

Human Services
3
Aberdeen Senior Citizens of Bingham County Inc

We serve the senior citizens of Southern Bingham County, and the Citizens of Aberdeen, Idaho Meals on Wheels and congregate meals onsite.

Human Services
4
Open Arms Pcc and Real Choices

Provide services to people before, throughout, and after an unplanned pregnancy.

Health
5
Family Promise of Cowlitz County

To help families with children in our community who are situationally homeless achieve sustainable independence through a community based response by providing temporary housing, usually 60-90 days, along with case management.

Human Services
6
Idaho Elks Rehab Hospital Inc
Health
7
Outsiders Inn

Outsiders Inn (OI) provides peer-lead homeless services and operates multiple shelter programs with a recovery focused model in the Clark County, WA area.

Housing & Shelter
8
Lake Chelan Food Bank

The mission of Lake Chelan Food Bank is to treat each person we serve with dignity and respect and to provide balanced and varied options that give each person the liberty to meet the specific food needs for themsevles and/or their family.

Food & Nutrition
9
Blue Mountain Health Cooperative

Offer accessible mental health services to the walla walla community, while creating an innovative learning environment for future providers.

Health
10
Palouse River Counseling Center Inc

To provide mental health and chemical dependency prevention and treatment programs in Whitman County, Washington.

Health
11
Stillwater Senior Citizens Center

Serving senior citizens in area

—
12
Northwest Washington Indian Health Board

Federal grants and contracts were used to provide direct community and public health services within Native American communities in Northwest Washington

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Willow Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Colfax Rotary Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

74 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 74 of the 254 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

12
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
73/74
Grantees still filing
46/74
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INTERLINK INC: $338,056 · OtherINTERLINK INCCommunity Health Association of Spo: $324,000 · OtherCommunity Health Association of SpoLewis Clark Dist Council of St Vinc: $194,500 · OtherSt Vincent de Paul Society: $155,000 · Other+151 more: $3,562,236 · Other+151 moreSNAKE RIVER COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $524,707 · HealthSNAKE RIVER COM…WINDING WATERS MEDICAL CLINIC: $150,000 · HealthWINDING WATERS …First Step 4 Life Recovery Center LTD: $105,000 · HealthFirst Step 4 Li…GINA QUESENBERRY BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $82,000 · HealthGINA QUESENBERR…Wallowa Valley Center for Wellness Inc: $65,000 · HealthWallowa Valley …WILLOW CENTER INC: $63,000 · HealthWILLOW CENTER I…+8 more: $111,280 · Health+8 moreInnovia Foundation: $240,000 · PhilanthropyInnovia F…PULLMAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $150,000 · PhilanthropyPULLMAN R…SYRINGA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $140,964 · PhilanthropySYRINGA H…UPPER CLEARWATER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $75,000 · PhilanthropyUPPER CLE…+2 more: $30,000 · PhilanthropyLC VALLEY YOUTH RESOURCE CENTER INC: $434,000 · Youth DevelopmentUPRIVER YOUTH LEADERSHIP COUNCIL INC: $110,434 · Youth DevelopmentROTARY FOUNDATION OF WALLOWA COUNTY: $52,230 · Youth DevelopmentFAMILY PROMISE OF THE PALOUSE INC: $107,776 · Human ServicesHomes of Hope A Christian Nonprofit Corporation: $75,865 · Human ServicesValley Community Center: $60,500 · Human ServicesFRIENDLY NEIGHBORS SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $32,747 · Human ServicesSENIOR CITIZENS DOLLAR A MONTH CLUB: $30,000 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL ON AGING & HUMAN SERVICES: $29,000 · Human ServicesClearwater County Senior Citizens Inc: $28,000 · Human ServicesNAMI IDAHO: $27,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $25,000 · Human ServicesCreating Memories for Disabled Children: $20,000 · Human ServicesBUILDING HEALTHY FAMILIES: $18,000 · Human ServicesMOSCOW CONTEMPORARY INC: $18,000 · Human Services+4 more: $45,000 · Human ServicesIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $355,000 · Food & NutritionCAMAS PRAIRIE FOOD BANK INC: $75,000 · Food & NutritionPRAIRIE MOUNTAIN NUTRITION INC: $33,000 · Food & NutritionVALLEY MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $30,000 · Food & NutritionFRAMING OUR COMMUNITY INC: $39,104 · Community ImprovementINLAND OASIS INC: $16,100 · Community Improvement
Other$4,573,792Health$1,100,987Philanthropy$635,964Youth Development$596,664Human Services$516,888Food & Nutrition$493,000Community Improvement$55,204

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSNAKE RIVER COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $524,707 over 7y, 35% of budgetLC VALLEY YOUTH RESOURCE CENTER INC: $434,000 over 5y, 25% of budgetIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $355,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetINTERLINK INC: $338,056 over 8y, 41% of budgetInnovia Foundation: $240,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetPULLMAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetWINDING WATERS MEDICAL CLINIC: $150,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSYRINGA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $140,964 over 2y, 39% of budgetUPRIVER YOUTH LEADERSHIP COUNCIL INC: $110,434 over 4y, 8.9% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF THE PALOUSE INC: $107,776 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetSOJOURNERS' ALLIANCE INC: $87,500 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetBackyard Harvest Inc: $86,250 over 3y, 59% of budgetGINA QUESENBERRY BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $82,000 over 7y, 11% of budgetHomes of Hope A Christian Nonprofit Corporation: $75,865 over 5y, 30% of budgetUPPER CLEARWATER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 1y, 54% of budgetCAMAS PRAIRIE FOOD BANK INC: $75,000 over 1y, 44% of budgetWallowa Valley Center for Wellness Inc: $65,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetWILLOW CENTER INC: $63,000 over 7y, 5.1% of budgetValley Community Center: $60,500 over 5y, 11% of budgetROTARY FOUNDATION OF WALLOWA COUNTY: $52,230 over 5y, 11% of budgetFRAMING OUR COMMUNITY INC: $39,104 over 1y, 11% of budgetTHE GREEN APPLE PROJECT: $36,000 over 5y, 17% of budgetPRAIRIE MOUNTAIN NUTRITION INC: $33,000 over 4y, 29% of budgetFRIENDLY NEIGHBORS SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $32,747 over 8y, 9.8% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS DOLLAR A MONTH CLUB: $30,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetTWIN COUNTY UNITED WAY INC: $30,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetCOUNCIL ON AGING & HUMAN SERVICES: $29,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetClearwater County Senior Citizens Inc: $28,000 over 3y, 7.6% of budgetNAMI IDAHO: $27,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetNORTHWEST CHILDRENS HOME: $26,253 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLATAH ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS: $21,500 over 2y, 22% of budgetAARC INC: $20,000 over 2y, 100% of budgetCreating Memories for Disabled Children: $20,000 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetJOSEPH BRANCH TRAIL CONSORTIUM: $20,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetLILI GC FOUNDATION CORP: $20,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetBUILDING HEALTHY FAMILIES: $18,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMOSCOW CONTEMPORARY INC: $18,000 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetFriends of Neill Public Library: $17,500 over 2y, 11% of budgetINLAND OASIS INC: $16,100 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetABBA DADDY HOUSE INC: $15,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetCROSS THE DIVIDE: $14,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRELIANCE MINISTRIES INC: $13,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetKAMIAH SENIOR CITIZENS SOCIETY INC & VALLEY SR MEAL SITE: $13,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF LEWISTON-CLARKSTON INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTWO RIVERS UNITED CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER CORP: $10,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetWALLA WALLA SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SNAKE RIVER COMMUNITY CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds LC VALLEY YOUTH RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds INTERLINK INC ↗
  • Who funds Innovia Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PULLMAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WINDING WATERS MEDICAL CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds SYRINGA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UPRIVER YOUTH LEADERSHIP COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF THE PALOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds First Step 4 Life Recovery Center LTD ↗
  • Who funds SOJOURNERS' ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Backyard Harvest Inc ↗
  • Who funds GINA QUESENBERRY BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Homes of Hope A Christian Nonprofit Corporation ↗
  • Who funds UPPER CLEARWATER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAMAS PRAIRIE FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Wallowa Valley Center for Wellness Inc ↗
  • Who funds WILLOW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Valley Community Center ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY FOUNDATION OF WALLOWA COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Avista FoundationWA58× affinity29 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Avista Foundation · Innovia Foundation · Idaho Foodbank Warehouse · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · The Deatley Family Foundation · Brien & Shelly Deatley Family Foundation · Latah County Community Foundation · Twin County United Way Inc · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · Blue Mountain Community Foundation · Harold & Helen Shepherd Foundation · Greater Columbia Accountable Community of Health

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lewis-Clark Valley Healthcare Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lewis-Clark Valley Healthcare Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 34%
  • Wallowa Mt Hells Canyon Trails Asso: 62% of income from government
  • Building Healthy Families: 41% of income from government
  • Joseph Branch Trail Consortium: 34% of income from government
  • Wallowa Valley Center for Wellness Inc: 25% of income from government
  • Winding Waters Medical Clinic: 11% of income from government
  • Rotary Foundation of Wallowa County: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lewis-Clark Valley Healthcare Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lewis-Clark Valley Healthcare Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 254 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lewis-Clark Valley Healthcare’s filings →

More from the funding graph