How much did THE DEATLEY FAMILY FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 52% of THE DEATLEY FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

hard

2019

achieve functions

2020

achieve functionswalla

2021

achieve functionswalla

2022

—

2023

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k32 grants · $99k
$10k–50k7 grants · $87k
$50k–250k1 grant · $150k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$13M

Total assets

Largest grants

BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS$150,000
ASOTIN ANATONE SCHOOL DISTRICT$16,000
SECOND JUDICIAL CASA$15,000
CLARKSTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION$14,000
LIFE$12,000
THE IDAHO FOOD BANK$10,000
VFW$10,000
LIFE 4TH GRADE BOAT TRIPS$10,000
LIONS CLUB - ASOTIN$8,000
LEWIS-CLARK STATE COLLEGE$6,000
WASHINGTON DECA$5,000
CAMP WITTMAN OUTDOOR CENTER$5,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$5,000
SHRINERS$5,000
GINA QUESENBERRY FOUNDATION$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.5M · 43 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

43 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.5M

$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%

+101%

Still filing today

26%

36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $77k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationHealthPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CE
CLARKSTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION
8× · 2017–2024 · $136k · revenue +39% · 32% of their budget
TE
TUMWATER EDUCATION FOUNDATION
3× · 2021–2023 · $24k · revenue +25%
NC
NORTHWEST CHILDRENS HOME
4× · 2017–2024 · $21k · revenue +29%

Funded once

TH
TRI-STATE HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $1.0M · revenue +101%
UC
UPPER CLEARWATER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +641% · 36% of their budget
LV
LC VALLEY PICKLEBALL CLUB
one grant, 2021 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Tillamook County Library Foundation

To help tillamook county build and sustain a library.

—

Mccall Public Library Foundation

The nonprofit McCall Public Library Foundation is organized to stimulate the interest of the public, friends, and supporters of the library in its development and enhancement of free public library services and its facilities.

Education

Orono Public Library Foundation

The Foundation's purpose is to acquire physical facilities for the Orono Public Library and thereafter provide for its continuous support.

Education

Lake View Foundation

To assist with civic projects within the City of Lake View, IA

Community Improvement

Cedar Park Public Library Foundation

To endow and fund the public library of cedar park.

Education

Weston County Library Foundation

To enhance the quality of public library services to weston county, wy by securing resources to support library programs and projects not normally met by public funding.

—

Colorado Northwestern Community College Foundation

Provide funding for scholarships and improvement projects for colorado northwestern community college

—

Kettle Falls Friends of the Parks & Pool

Provide funding for building, operations, swim lessons & physical education for community pool.

Community Improvement

Claremore Public Schools Foundation

To assist the claremore public schools in improving the quality of education in the district

Education

Cashmere Schools Foundation

Support the 'No child left behind' initiative and promote education in the community through furthering and augmenting programs in the Cashmere public school system.

Education

Mid Rogue Foundation

We promote healthy and vibrant communities through support, advocacy and partnerships with a focus on housing, education, transportation and the built environment.

Human Services

Tift County Foundation

To foster excellence in the tift county public schools.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Blue Mountain Community College and the most unlike its peers is Modie Park Conservancy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/22

the rest of the field

10%

117/1,226

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

17/17

Grantees still filing

14/17

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,453,765Health$1,006,000Education$240,192Philanthropy$55,000Youth Development$15,000Environment$10,000Human Services$4,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Innovia FoundationWA22.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Innovia Foundation · Brien & Shelly Deatley Family Foundation · Lewis-Clark Valley Healthcare Foundation · The Avista Foundation · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE DEATLEY FAMILY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MODIE PARK CONSERVANCY.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~79 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 820488820 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MODIE PARK CONSERVANCY, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 79 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 46% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Deatley Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Deatley Family Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE DEATLEY FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Deatley Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph

THE DEATLEY FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Deatley Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph