· Public charity
Twin County United Way Inc
To raise funds by voluntary solicitation and contributions for nonprofit local, state and national benevolent, charitable, health and social welfare organizatoins and to distribute the funds raised periodically to participating organizations.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 17 grants below total $245,955 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $268,415 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $22,460 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k6 grants · $42k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $146k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $58k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF | $58,095 |
| YWCA OF LEWISTON-CLARK | $23,236 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION PART | $19,698 |
| SECOND JUDICIAL DIST C | $16,045 |
| FAMILY PROMISE | $15,309 |
| WILLOW CENTER | $13,547 |
| SNAKE RIVER COMMUNITY | $12,293 |
| INTERLINK VOLUNTEERS | $12,144 |
| IDAHO LEGAL AID SERVIC | $12,000 |
| LEWIS CLARK VALLEY YOUNG LIFE | $11,048 |
| THE IDAHO FOODBANK | $10,733 |
| VALLEY MEALS ON WHEELS | $8,995 |
| FIRST STEPS 4 LIFE | $7,933 |
| AREA AGENCY ON AGING | $7,617 |
| ASOTIN COUNTY FOOD BK | $6,603 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $700k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
22 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2022, 6 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE LEWIS CLARK VALLEY INC6× · 2017–2022 · $594k · revenue +226%
- CACOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP6× · 2017–2022 · $336k · revenue +29%
- YWYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF LEWISTON-CLARKSTON INC6× · 2017–2022 · $295k · revenue +20%
Funded once
- RROCone grant, 2019 · $13k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide guardian ad litem services in child protection cases for the third judicial district of the state of idaho
Operation of a foster family care agency
To help families with children in our community who are situationally homeless achieve sustainable independence through a community based response by providing temporary housing, usually 60-90 days, along with case management.
The mission of Lake Chelan Food Bank is to treat each person we serve with dignity and respect and to provide balanced and varied options that give each person the liberty to meet the specific food needs for themsevles and/or their family.
Trained and supported volunteer guardian ad litems for the children of Kittitas County
Provide referrals for court mandated community service. offer meal delivery for home bound individuals.
Provide legal services for children in area.
Outsiders Inn (OI) provides peer-lead homeless services and operates multiple shelter programs with a recovery focused model in the Clark County, WA area.
The primary goal of Willits Community Services is to provide temporary assistance services to families and individuals in crisis. WCS also provides referrals to other community or regional resources and gives assistance to clients in…
Sage Indigenous Law Center's mission is to provide culturally grounded civil legal aid that protects the rights of Native American parents, children, and communities, while advancing justice and addressing systemic inequities.
Lake county food share inc is an organization whose purpose is to coordinate and to meet both supplemental and emergency food needs of families and individuals in lake county, oregon.
To provide meals, health related services, social activities and other services to the local community with a focus on seniors.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is For the Children and the most unlike its peers is Valley Meals On Wheels Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE LEWIS CLARK VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF LEWISTON-CLARKSTON INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF LEWIS CLARK VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds ASOTIN COUNTY FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SNAKE RIVER COMMUNITY CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE ↗
- Who funds Second Judicial District Casa Program Inc ↗
- Who funds WILLOW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds VALLEY MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds INTERLINK INC ↗
- Who funds IDAHO LEGAL AID SERVICES INC IDAHO LEGAL AID SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds Homes of Hope A Christian Nonprofit Corporation ↗
- Who funds QUALITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds Inland NW Council Endowment Foundation ↗
- Who funds WA-ID VOLUNTEER CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Girl Scouts of Eastern Washington and Northern Idaho ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS IDAHO INC ↗
- Who funds FOR THE CHILDREN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Innovia Foundation · Lewis-Clark Valley Healthcare Foundation · Brien & Shelly Deatley Family Foundation · The Avista Foundation · Dutch Bros Foundation · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Twin County United Way Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.