Skip to content

· Public charity

Leveling the Playing Field Inc

Leveling the playing field gives underprivileged children the opportunity to enjoy the mental and physical benefits of youth sports participation.

$951k
Granted FY2018
38
Grants FY2018
7
States reached
$76k
Largest
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Recreation & Sports$426kEducation$211kYouth Development$111kCommunity Improvement$78kHuman Services$57kHealth$17kPhilanthropy$16kCivil Rights$13kOther$0
02FY2018 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 38 grants below total $521,368, the rows itemized in this filing. The $951,336 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $429,968 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k23 grants · $174k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $270k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $76k
$9,124
Median grant
7
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FACEBOOK$76,495
IMPACT SILVER SPRING$40,154
REUNION SPORTIVE D'HAITI INC$39,158
PAPA'S LAND FAMILY EDUCATIONAL ADVA$25,560
PAPADIA UNITED SOCCER ROOTS USA$25,198
ANACOSTIA AMP OUTREACH EMPOWERMENT$16,846
Individual grant recipient$16,314
DREAM SPORTS AFRICA$16,278
ROCKY POINT YOUTH RECREATION$14,716
BESTER COMMUNITY OF HOPE$14,559
NORTHWOOD BASEBALL LEAGUE INC$14,406
THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR CHILDREN AN$13,096
FUNDACION LOS NINOS DE MARIA INC$12,115
WOLVES LACROSSE CLUB INC$11,526
THE BALTIMORE CRIMSON TIDE INC$10,519
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Y IN CENTRAL MARYLAND: $8k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
PA
CA
VA
MD
NM
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

37%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$447k · 10 repeat orgs$752k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
44

Total granted

$447k
$452k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+37%

Still filing today

20%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $299k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
EducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • F
    FACEBOOK
    3× · 2017–2019 · $124k
  • IS
    IMPACT SILVER SPRING
    8× · 2017–2024 · $70k · revenue +14%
  • RS
    Reunion Sportive d'Haiti Inc
    4× · 2017–2022 · $65k · revenue +46% · 37% of their budget

Funded once

  • HB
    HOCKEY BEYOND BOUNDARIES INTERNATIO
    one grant, 2017 · $61k
  • DB
    DEEN BALL SPORTS INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • EW
    Excelsior Wellnessgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $17k · revenue +113%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Boys and Girls Clubs of Metropolitan Baltimore

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens

Youth Development
2
Baltimore Sports Academy Inc

Baltimore Sports Academy serves under resourced communities by providing elementary-aged youth access to summer camps, after school programs, and sports leagues to develop strong bodies, minds and spirits. We assist youth to have success…

Recreation & Sports
3
Bethesda Soccer Club Inc

Develop and promote the growth of and an appreciation for the game of soccer.

Recreation & Sports
4
Dugout Youth Development

Alowing kids Youth sports and competitio

Youth Development
5
Dhs Club

Youth sports - physical education & skills development

—
6
Marauders Baseball Club

Youth Baseball league

—
7
Chantilly Youth Association

To implant firmly in the youth of the community by providing supervised athletic events, the ideals of good sportsmanship, honesty, loyalty, courage and respect so that they may become well adjusted, stronger and happier and will grow to…

Recreation & Sports
8
Stratford High School Lacrosse

Youth Sports activities

Recreation & Sports
9
Gladiator Sports

Youth development

Recreation & Sports
10
Bridgeport Caribe Youth Leaders Inc

To provide youth with sports, educational and civic direction helping them build the character and self-esteem they need to reach their full potential and value in society.

Youth Development
11
I Got Next Youth Sports Inc

Youth academic and physical health devel

Human Services
12
Charm City Youth Lacrosse League Inc

To introduce and expand the Lacrosse Community into Baltimore City. This expansion is designed to provide and expand educationl opportunities for Baltimore City youth.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amandla Inc; the most unlike its peers is Golf My Future Mygame. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

103 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
27
Early backer (in before they grew)
95/103
Grantees still filing
67/103
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FACEBOOK: $123,698 · OtherFACEBOOKReunion Sportive d'Haiti Inc: $64,702 · OtherReunion Sportive d'Haiti IncHOCKEY BEYOND BOUNDARIES INTERNATIO: $60,887 · OtherHOCKEY BEYOND BOUNDARIES INTERNATIOACADEMY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER EXPL: $36,189 · OtherELITE SOCCER YOUTH DEVELOPMENT ACAD: $35,620 · OtherWOLVES LACROSSE CLUB INC: $35,579 · Other+64 more: $657,493 · Other+64 moreIMPACT SILVER SPRING: $70,462 · PhilanthropySO WHAT ELSE INC: $15,642 · PhilanthropyFUNDACION LOS NINOS DE MARIA INC: $12,115 · Youth DevelopmentUNITY YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $8,841 · Youth DevelopmentBUDDIES INC ELAINE WELKIE: $5,525 · Youth DevelopmentKIPP BALTIMORE INC: $7,502 · EducationPAUL PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $5,921 · EducationYELLOW BREECHES EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $5,564 · EducationGREEN STREET ACADEMY INC: $5,416 · EducationExcelsior Wellness: $16,978 · HealthANACOSTIA AMP OUTREACH EMPOWERMENT: $16,846 · Community ImprovementGOLF MY FUTURE MYGAME: $14,050 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,014,168Philanthropy$86,104Youth Development$26,481Education$24,403Health$16,978Community Improvement$16,846Arts & Culture$14,050

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIMPACT SILVER SPRING: $70,462 over 8y, 3.8% of budgetReunion Sportive d'Haiti Inc: $64,702 over 4y, 37% of budgetExcelsior Wellness: $16,978 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BELL FOUNDATION INC: $16,959 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSO WHAT ELSE INC: $15,642 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetFUNDACION LOS NINOS DE MARIA INC: $12,115 over 7y, 14% of budgetMARLBORO BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $8,411 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Inc: $8,351 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIPP BALTIMORE INC: $7,502 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAUL PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $5,921 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYELLOW BREECHES EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $5,564 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBUDDIES INC ELAINE WELKIE: $5,525 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetGREEN STREET ACADEMY INC: $5,416 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IMPACT SILVER SPRING ↗
  • Who funds Reunion Sportive d'Haiti Inc ↗
  • Who funds Excelsior Wellness ↗
  • Who funds THE BELL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ANACOSTIA AMP OUTREACH EMPOWERMENT ↗
  • Who funds SO WHAT ELSE INC ↗
  • Who funds GOLF MY FUTURE MYGAME ↗
  • Who funds FUNDACION LOS NINOS DE MARIA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Good Sports IncMA35.2× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Good Sports Inc · Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation · Womens Sports Foundation · The Abell Foundation Inc · Fund for Educational Excellence Inc · Greater Washington Community Foundation · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · West Baltimore Renaissance Foundation Inc · Family League of Baltimore City Inc · Clark Charitable Foundation Inc Dba a James & Alice B Clark Foundation · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · 50can Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leveling the Playing Field Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leveling the Playing Field Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Young Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Inc: 22% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Leveling the Playing Field Inc?

Find your warmest path to Leveling the Playing Field Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 82 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $3.7M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2018, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Leveling the Playing Field’s filings →

More from the funding graph