· Private foundation
Leroy Neiman and Janet Byrne Neiman Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k101 grants · $238k
- $10k–50k34 grants · $670k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $132k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HILLSBOROUGH EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC | $74,182 |
| GOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATION | $58,000 |
| MUHAMMAD ALI CENTER | $40,000 |
| PUBLICOLOR | $35,000 |
| THE DRAW PROJECT LTD | $35,000 |
| RACLIN MURPHY MUSEUM OF ART | $35,000 |
| HYDE PARK ART CENTER | $30,000 |
| THE DRAWING CENTER INC | $30,000 |
| CREATIVE ARTS WORKSHOPS FOR KIDS INC | $25,000 |
| ART21 INC | $25,000 |
| THE BRONX MUSEUM OF THE ARTS | $25,000 |
| FREE ARTS FOR ABUSED CHILDREN OF NEW YORK CITY INC | $25,000 |
| PROJECT ART | $25,000 |
| MATERIALS FOR THE ARTS INC | $25,000 |
| ALLEN MEMORIAL ART MUSEUM | $21,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $822k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 13% of Leroy Neiman and Janet Byrne Neiman Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
30 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $474k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PIPUBLICOLOR INC5× · 2020–2024 · $203k · revenue +19%
- TDTHE DRAWING CENTER INC4× · 2021–2024 · $138k · revenue +33%
- FAFREE ARTS FOR ABUSED CHILDREN OF NEW YORK CITY INC4× · 2021–2024 · $114k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- PFPRO FOOTBALL HALL OF FAMEone grant, 2023 · $908k
- TATHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGOgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $459k · revenue +29%
- JMJORGE M PEREZ ART MUSEUM OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $360k · revenue +112%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The studio museum in harlem is a contemporary art museum that focuses on the work of artists of african descent - as well as work that has been inspired and influenced by african culture - past and present; through its exhibitions,…
A center for exhibitions, information, and documentation about living artists since 1977, which continues to be a place of experimentation and a hub of new art and new ideas.
The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)
The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…
Committed to innovation, the solomon r. guggenheim foundation (the "foundation") collects, (continued on schedule o)
The new york academy of art is a unique graduate school that combines intensive technical training in the fine arts with active critical discourse. we believe that rigorously trained artists are best able to realize their artistic vision.…
The philadelphia museum of art - in partnership with the city, the region, and art museums around the globe - seeks to preserve, enhance, interpret, and extend the reach of its great collection in particular, and the visual arts in…
The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Museum of Contemporary Art and the most unlike its peers is Poster House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds United States Olympic and Paralympic Museum ↗
- Who funds GOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds JORGE M PEREZ ART MUSEUM OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds INDIANAPOLIS MOTOR SPEEDWAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PUBLICOLOR INC ↗
- Who funds THE DRAWING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FREE ARTS FOR ABUSED CHILDREN OF NEW YORK CITY INC ↗
- Who funds NFL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds United States Artists Inc ↗
- Who funds KENTUCKY DERBY MUSEUM CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ART21 INC ↗
- Who funds Creative Arts Workshops for Kids Inc ↗
- Who funds MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds The Bronx Museum of the Arts ↗
- Who funds HYDE PARK ART CENTER ↗
- Who funds ARTCOUNCIL INC DBA ARTADIA ↗
- Who funds LES PAUL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP WITH CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds ART CREATES US INC ↗
- Who funds Hillsborough Education Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds QUEENS MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds Urban Arts Partnership ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL STUDIO & CURATORIAL PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds MUHAMMAD ALI MUSEUM AND EDUCATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF MATERIALS FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds BLUE MOUNTAINS PROJECTS INC ↗
- Who funds Hunterdon Art Museum ↗
- Who funds TIGER WOODS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR ARTS EDUCATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Milton and Sally Avery Arts Foundation · Arison Arts Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · May and Samuel Rudin Family Foundation Inc · Ag Foundation · The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc · The Cowles Charitable Trust · Cornelia T Bailey Charitable Trust · The Ford Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · Cornelia T Bailey Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Leroy Neiman and Janet Byrne Neiman Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hunterdon Art Museum — 9% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.