Skip to content

· Private foundation

Leota Steed Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$262k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$85k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$355kYouth Development$315kEducation$177kHealth$165kHuman Services$63kFood & Nutrition$50kReligion$45kCrime & Legal$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $92k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $135k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WICHITA FALLS$85,000
UNITED REGIONAL FOUNDATION$50,000
HANDS TO HANDS$15,000
THE KITCHEN$10,000
FAITH MISSION$10,000
CHRIST ACADEMY$6,735
WICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK$5,000
CAMP FIRE NORTH TEXAS$5,000
ARC OF WICHITA COUNTY$5,000
FIRST STEP WICHITA FALLS INC$5,000
BIG BORHTERS BIG SISTERS$5,000
MSU PRESIDENT'S EXCELLANCE CIRCLE$5,000
RATHGEBER HOSPITALITY HOUSE$5,000
SALVATION ARMY OF WF$5,000
PATSYS HOUSE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $165k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME & SERVICES: $10k → 10%HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS: $50k → 9%HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS: $10k → 9%HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS: $5k → 9%HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS: $5k → 9%HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS: $5k → 9%THE KITCHEN: $10k → 16%THE KITCHEN: $5k → 16%THE KITCHEN: $5k → 16%THE KITCHEN: $5k → 16%THE KITCHEN: $5k → 16%CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY OF WEST TEXAS: $5k → 16%HANDS TO HANDS: $15k → 16%HANDS TO HANDS: $5k → 16%HANDS TO HANDS: $5k → 16%ARC OF WICHITA COUNTY: $5k → 16%ARC OF WICHITA COUNTY: $5k → 16%ARC OF WICHITA COUNTY: $5k → 16%HANDS TO HANDS: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 21 repeat orgs$90k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against -15% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
12

Total granted

$1.2M
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
-15%

Still filing today

52%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CHRIST ACADEMY
    3× · 2020–2024 · $147k · revenue +53%
  • HO
    Hospice of Wichita Falls Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $75k · revenue +18%
  • RH
    Rathgeber Hospitality House
    5× · 2020–2024 · $35k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • MS
    MIDWESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • PC
    PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -4%
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
2
Childrens Advocacy Center of West Texas Inc

The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.

Crime & Legal
3
Wichita Family Crisis Center

Formerly ywca wichita, the wichita family crisis center (wfcc) began operations in wichita, ks in 1907. wfcc's mission is to eliminate domestic violence in our community by supporting survivors through shelter, education & advocacy.

Human Services
4
North Texas Parent & Child Development Inc

The organization is dedicated to providing quality, comprehensive services to pregnant women, infants, and toddlers. teaming with other agencies enables them to help each child and family achieve social competency. early head start…

—
5
Caritas of Waco

To provide emergency/supplemental assistance in the form of food, clothing, household items, utility, rent and mortgage aid to people in need in the waco community.also provides case management assistance to people wanting to become…

Human Services
6
Casa of Williamson County Texas

CASA of Williamson County, TX exists to empower community volunteers to advocate for children who have experienced abuse or neglect to find loving, safe, and permanent homes.

Crime & Legal
7
Christmas in Action

In partnership with the community, christmas in action rehabilitates the homes of low income elderly and low income disabled so that they may continue to live in warmth, safety and independence.

Housing & Shelter
8
Food Bank of West Central Texas

To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.

Food & Nutrition
9
West Texas Food Bank

The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…

—
10
Wichita Falls Faith Mission Inc

To provide christ-centered programs and services that lead the homeless toward self-sufficiency.

Religion
11
Wichita Area Sexual Assault Center Inc

Wichita area sexual assault center works with individuals and communities through comprehensive services and education to create a culture of intolerance for sexual violence and an atmosphere of healing for those impacted by it.

Health
12
Women's and Children's Crisis Shelter

Women's and children's crisis shelter is committed to providing safety, shelter and hope to victims of domestic violence.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Aid Society of West Tx Inc; the most unlike its peers is North Central Texas Community Health Care Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED REGIONAL FOUNDATION: $355,001 · OtherUNITED REGIONAL FOUNDATIONBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WICHITA FALLS: $270,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WICHITA FALLSFAITH MISSION: $35,000 · Other+20 more: $168,000 · Other+20 moreHospice of Wichita Falls Inc: $75,000 · Human ServicesHospice of Wic…HANDS TO HANDS: $30,000 · Human ServicesHANDS TO HANDSSENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC DBA THE KITCHEN: $30,000 · Human ServicesSENIOR CITIZEN…THE ARC OF WICHITA COUNTY INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF WIC…PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES: $10,000 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN C…+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesCHRIST ACADEMY: $146,735 · EducationCHRIST ACADEM…Rathgeber Hospitality House: $35,000 · HealthNorth Central Texas Community Health Care Center: $15,000 · HealthFIRST STEP OF WICHITA FALLS INC: $10,000 · HealthWICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK: $20,000 · Food & NutritionCAMP FIRE NORTH TEXAS: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentPatsy's House Children's Advocacy Center: $15,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$828,001Human Services$165,000Education$146,735Health$60,000Food & Nutrition$20,000Youth Development$15,000Crime & Legal$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHRIST ACADEMY: $146,735 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetHospice of Wichita Falls Inc: $75,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetRathgeber Hospitality House: $35,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetSENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC DBA THE KITCHEN: $30,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetWICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNorth Central Texas Community Health Care Center: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP FIRE NORTH TEXAS: $15,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTHE ARC OF WICHITA COUNTY INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetPatsy's House Children's Advocacy Center: $15,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetFIRST STEP OF WICHITA FALLS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRIST COUNSELING MINISTRY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetProject Back to School: $5,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY OF WEST TX INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA COUNTY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHRIST ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Hospice of Wichita Falls Inc ↗
  • Who funds Rathgeber Hospitality House ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC DBA THE KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds North Central Texas Community Health Care Center ↗
  • Who funds CAMP FIRE NORTH TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF WICHITA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Patsy's House Children's Advocacy Center ↗
  • Who funds FIRST STEP OF WICHITA FALLS INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds CHRIST COUNSELING MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds Project Back to School ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY OF WEST TX INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

James N McCoy FoundationTX32.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: James N McCoy Foundation · Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation · The Fain Foundation · Bryant Edwards Foundation Inc · Donnell Foundation · Julia Lee Taubert Foundation · Guinn Foundation Inc · J S Bridwell Foundation · The Priddy Foundation · Kadane Foundation · Gene Conley Foundation · Bill & Jan Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leota Steed Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leota Steed Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Leota Steed Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Leota Steed Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Leota Steed’s filings →

    More from the funding graph