Skip to content

· Private foundation

Leon J Millard

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$235k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$175kHuman Services$151kYouth Development$128kHealth$67kEducation$50kHousing & Shelter$37kCrime & Legal$35kFood & Nutrition$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $200k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOWN SYNDROME ALLIANCE OF THE MIDLANDS$15,000
HEART MINISTRY CENTER INC$15,000
CONNECTED ROOTS CARE CENTER$15,000
CAROLE'S HOUSE OF HOPE$15,000
DIBS FOR KIDS$10,000
AVENUE SCHOLARS$10,000
NOTHING BUT NET FOUNDATION$10,000
HOT SHOPS ART FOUNDATION$10,000
GENERATION DIAMOND CORP$10,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$10,000
GIRL SCOUTS SPIRIT OF NEBRASKA$10,000
HEARTLAND WORKERS CENTER$10,000
FINANCIAL HOPE COLLABORATIVE$10,000
HOPE CENTER FOR KIDS$10,000
KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $10k → 12%HEARTLAND WORKERS CENTER: $10k → 12%CONNECTED ROOTS CARE CENTER: $15k → 12%FINANCIAL HOPE COLLABORATIVE: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

9%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$72k · 5 repeat orgs$765k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
39

Total granted

$72k
$530k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $235k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationPublic BenefitFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OO
    Opera Omaha, Inc
    2× · 2020–2024 · $20k
  • NA
    Nonprofit Association of the Midlands
    2× · 2020–2024 · $20k
  • RI
    RELEASE Inc
    2× · 2020–2024 · $15k

Funded once

  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2020 · $29k
  • SF
    SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE
    one grant, 2020 · $26k
  • VN
    Visiting Nurse Health Services (DBA Visiting Nurse Association/VNA)
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
One Omaha

One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.

Community Improvement
2
Nebraska Youth Center

The center operates a group home for troubled youth, ages 12-18, in western nebraska.

—
3
North Omaha Collective

To build the capacity of youth serving organizations, service providers, families and community to claim their voice, cultivate healing and take courageous action to improve their overall health and well being.

Human Services
4
Educare of Lincoln Inc

To help young children thrive socially, emotionally and academically through high-quality early childhood education, and in partnership with their families and the community.

Education
5
Nebraska Children & Families Foundation

Nebraska children's mission is to create positive change for children through community engagement. our vision is a nebraska where all children will have the resources and support to reach their full potential. our values are (1)…

Philanthropy
6
Voices for Children in Nebraska

Voices for children in nebraska is the independent voice building pathways to opportunity for all children and families through research, policy and community engagement.

—
7
Omaha Children's Museum

Omaha children's museum is a not-for-profit organization that provides children and families with opportunities to discover how the world works, challenge themselves, and learn through play. the mission of the museum is to engage the…

Arts & Culture
8
Community Justice Center

A restorative justice agency committed to habilitating justice in nebraska.

Crime & Legal
9
Share Omaha

Our mission is to help nonprofits fulfill theirs.

Philanthropy
10
Omaha Community Foundation

To serve the community by cultivating generosity and strengthening nonprofits.

Philanthropy
11
Eastern Nebraska Community Action Partnership

Encap provides high-impact programs to help people get ahead.

—
12
Omaha Economic Development Corporation

The mission of oedc is to implement economic development projects, housing, and community revitalization programs that create jobs, business ownership opportunities and other economic benefits for area residents.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope Center for Kids Inc; the most unlike its peers is El Museo Latino. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
4/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALVATION ARMY: $29,000 · OtherSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $26,000 · OtherVisiting Nurse Health Services (DBA Visiting Nurse Association/VNA): $25,000 · OtherOPEN DOOR MISSION: $25,000 · OtherSheltering Tree, Inc.: $22,100 · Other+43 more: $509,800 · Other+43 moreCONNECTED ROOTS CARE CENTER: $15,000 · Human ServicesFINANCIAL HOPE COLLABORATIVE: $10,000 · Human ServicesKIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $10,000 · Human ServicesHEARTLAND WORKERS CENTER: $10,000 · Human ServicesGIRL SCOUTS SPIRIT OF NEBRASKA: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOMPLETELY KIDS: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentHOPE CENTER FOR KIDS INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INCORPORATED OF OMAHA: $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentBlue Barn Theatre: $10,000 · Arts & CultureGeneration Diamond Corporation: $10,000 · Arts & CultureEL MUSEO LATINO: $7,500 · Arts & CultureGREAT PLAINS THEATRE COMMONS: $5,000 · Arts & CultureAFRICAN CULTURE CONNECTION: $5,000 · Arts & CultureNOTHING BUT NET FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationDIBS for Kids: $10,000 · EducationAVENUE SCHOLARS: $10,000 · EducationOMAHA STREET SCHOOL: $5,000 · EducationCarole's House of Hope: $15,000 · Public BenefitHEART MINISTRY CENTER: $15,000 · Food & NutritionDOWN SYNDROME ALLIANCE OF THE MIDLANDS: $15,000 · Philanthropy
Other$636,900Human Services$45,000Youth Development$37,500Arts & Culture$37,500Education$35,000Public Benefit$15,000Food & Nutrition$15,000Philanthropy$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCarole's House of Hope: $15,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCONNECTED ROOTS CARE CENTER: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEART MINISTRY CENTER: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS SPIRIT OF NEBRASKA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOT SHOPS ART FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBlue Barn Theatre: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCOMPLETELY KIDS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNOTHING BUT NET FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetKIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDIBS for Kids: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAVENUE SCHOLARS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGREAT PLAINS THEATRE COMMONS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetOMAHA STREET SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAFRICAN CULTURE CONNECTION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Carole's House of Hope ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTED ROOTS CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HEART MINISTRY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ALLIANCE OF THE MIDLANDS ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS SPIRIT OF NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds HOT SHOPS ART FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Blue Barn Theatre ↗
  • Who funds COMPLETELY KIDS ↗
  • Who funds FINANCIAL HOPE COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds NOTHING BUT NET FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND WORKERS CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lozier FoundationNE44.7× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lozier Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation · Todd and Mary Heistand Family Foundation · Gilbert M and Martha H Hitchcock Foundation · Peter Kiewit Foundation · Mutual of Omaha Foundation · United Way of the Midlands · The Hawks Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · Suzanne & Walter Scott Foundation · Leland J & Dorothy H Olson Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leon J Millard funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leon J Millard. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Leon J Millard’s filings →

    More from the funding graph