· Private foundation
Lenora and Alfred Glancy Foundation Inc Margaret Scott Alston & Bird LLP
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $10k
- $10k–50k27 grants · $485k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE | $50,000 |
| CANINE ASSISTANTS | $40,000 |
| MADISON-MORGAN CONSERVANCY | $40,000 |
| HILLSDALE COLLEGE | $30,000 |
| SAMARITAN'S PURSE | $25,000 |
| ALSAC ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL | $25,000 |
| THE CARING PLACE | $25,000 |
| THE NEW SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| PIEDMONT ATHENS REGIONAL FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| WOODWARD ACADEMY | $20,000 |
| MORGAN COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | $20,000 |
| CHRISTIAN ACADEMY OF KNOXVILLE | $20,000 |
| THE STAR FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| MORGAN COUNTY FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE | $15,000 |
| RABUN GAP-NACOOCHEE SCHOOL | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $472k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
30 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CACANINE ASSISTANTS INC4× · 2021–2024 · $200k · revenue +18%
- ALALICE LLOYD COLLEGE4× · 2021–2024 · $157k · revenue +63%
- MCMadison-Morgan Conservancy Inc4× · 2021–2024 · $149k · revenue +56%
Funded once
- TWTEAM WEST KENTUCKY TORNADO RELIEF FUNDone grant, 2021 · $50k
- TWThe Westminster Schools Incone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +13%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…
We are a k-12 christian school founded under the following (4) pillars: academics: we provide an amazing accredited academic program utilizing 100% certified teachers. schedule: we provide our students and their families an opportunity on…
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.
Marietta college (mc) provides a strong foundation for a lifetime of leadership, critical thinking, and problem solving. we achieve this mission by offering undergraduates a contemporary liberal arts education and graduate students an…
King's Ridge Christian School is a Christian community providing a college preparatory education equipping students to know, to serve, and to believe.
Greensboro College provides a liberal arts education grounded in the traditions of the United Methodist Church and fosters the intellectual, social, and spiritual development of all students while supporting their individual needs.
The mission of portersville christian school is to glorify god by preparing students to serve christ and instilling high standards spiritually, academically, socially, and physically. the school provides a high-quality academic program, a…
To operate a private school for age 3 through eighth grade students.
We create opportunities for discovery and reflection by engaging the minds, hands, and hearts of our students.
Since 1775, the mission of Hampden-Sydney College has been to form good men and good citizens in an atmosphere of sound learning.
Concord academy is a community animated by love of learning, diverse and striving for equity, with common trust as our foundation. honoring each individual, we challenge and expand our understanding of ourselves and the world through…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CANINE ASSISTANTS INC ↗
- Who funds ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Madison-Morgan Conservancy Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CARING PLACE ↗
- Who funds THE NEW SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Morgan County Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN ACADEMY OF KNOXVILLE ↗
- Who funds WOODWARD ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds PAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS ↗
- Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
- Who funds FERST READERS INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOYCE L ANSLEY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds Rabun Gap-Nacoochee School ↗
- Who funds The Star Foundation ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds HOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Piedmont Athens Regional Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Madison-Morgan Community Food Pantry Inc ↗
- Who funds JOSEPHS COAT INC ↗
- Who funds GREENE COUNTY CHRISTMAS STOCKING INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds The Westminster Schools Inc ↗
- Who funds KATE'S CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds WYOMING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Bryans Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Lenora and Alfred Glancy Foundation Inc Margaret Scott Alston & Bird LLP funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- K9S for Warriors Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Lenora and Alfred Glancy Foundation Inc Margaret Scott Alston & Bird LLP?
Find your warmest path to Lenora and Alfred Glancy Foundation Inc Margaret Scott Alston & Bird LLP through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.