· Private foundation
Lennox Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k147 grants · $712k
- $10k–50k19 grants · $304k
- $50k–250k37 grants · $3.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATURE CONSERVANCY | $200,000 |
| WOOD RIVER LAND TRUST COMPANY | $100,000 |
| THE ARC OF THE FARMINGTON VALLEY INC | $100,000 |
| CAMP CHIPPEWA FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| PROJECT ANGEL HEART | $100,000 |
| DIFFVELOPMENT | $100,000 |
| ANIMAL SHELTER OF WOOD RIVER VALLEY | $100,000 |
| MANO A MANO INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS | $100,000 |
| MONTANA SKATEPARK ASSOCIATION | $100,000 |
| HIGHLAND HOSPITAL OF ROCHESTER | $100,000 |
| BRIDGE | $100,000 |
| FRIENDS OF WILLOW CREEK OF SAUSALITO | $100,000 |
| HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC | $100,000 |
| STEAMBOAT HEALTH & RECREATION ASSOCIATION | $100,000 |
| BRIDGER SKI FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $3.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Where the work is directed
The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.
About 10% of Lennox Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.
188 repeat relationships: 97 still active in FY2024, 91 since wound down; 68 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $901k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- MAMANO A MANO INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS7× · 2018–2024 · $701k · revenue +19%
PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $672k · revenue +37%- HIHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC8× · 2017–2024 · $665k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- MCMID-IOWA COMMUNITY ACTION INCone grant, 2019 · $150k · revenue -9%
- TFTHE FOUNDATION STEAMBOAT SPRINGS WINTER SPORTS CLUBgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +132%
YMCA OF GREATER ROCHESTER (4368)one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +21%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.
Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…
Wildearth guardians works to protect and restore the wildlife, wild places, wild rivers, and health of the american west.
Alaska Whale Foundation is dedicated to marine mammal conservation through research monitoring and education.
The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
California Coastkeeper Alliance unites Waterkeeper programs statewide to fight for swimmable, fishable, and drinkable waters for all Californians.
How this is measured
372 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 372 of the 442 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL SHELTER OF WOOD RIVER VALLEY DBA MOUNTAIN HUMANE ↗
- Who funds MANO A MANO INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds MONTANA SKATEPARK ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC ↗
- Who funds HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC ↗
- Who funds NAOMI'S VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST VENTURA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds STEAMBOAT HEALTH & RECREATION ASSOC ↗
- Who funds UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PREBLE STREET ↗
- Who funds BERKSHIRE SOUTH REGIONAL COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds STEAMBOAT SPRINGS WINTER SPORTS CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds BERKSHIRE TACONIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE TREEHOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF THE FARMINGTON VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds DIFFvelopment ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Southern Maine ↗
- Who funds WOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO ↗
- Who funds MOFFETT FIELD HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds NORTHAMPTON MONTESSORI SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Fayetteville Public Library Foundation ↗
- Who funds KENNEBEC VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE SKI TEAM INC ↗
- Who funds Hospice of Southern Maine ↗
- Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds Camp Chippewa Foundation ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR ICHTHYOSIS AND RELATED SKIN TYPES INC ↗
- Who funds THE SPARK FOUNDATION INC % MAX MAHLER ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND FORESTRY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ACADEMY FOR GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds BERSHIRE RESOURCES FOR INTEGRATION OF DIVERSE GROUPS & EDUCATION INC BRIDGE ↗
- Who funds Rocky Mountain Institute ↗
- Who funds Friends of Katahdin Woods & Waters ↗
- Who funds Missoula Curling Club ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Cabin Foundation · Onion Foundation · Elmina B Sewall Foundation · Horizon Foundation Inc · Sam L Cohen Foundation · Maine Community Foundation Inc · The Widgeon Point Charitable Foundation · Fisher Charitable Foundation · Saco & Biddeford Savings Charitable Foundation · United Way Inc · Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · Ro Family Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Lennox Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lennox Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- New England Forestry Foundation Inc: 88% of income from government
- The Arc of the Farmington Valley Inc: 86% of income from government
- Tapestry Health Systems Inc: 60% of income from government
- Special Olympics Connecticut Inc: 42% of income from government
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
- National Fallen Firefighters Foundation: 24% of income from government
- The Treehouse Foundation Inc: 23% of income from government
- The Coalition of Oregon Land Trusts: 18% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
- Clackamas Volunteers in Medicine: 7% of income from government
- Flying Cloud Institute Inc: 6% of income from government
- Construct Inc: 4% of income from government
- Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
- Clearwater Marine Aquarium Inc: 1% of income from government
- Amherst College Trustees: 0% of income from government
- Choate Rosemary Hall Foundation Incorporated: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Lennox Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Lennox Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Lennox’s filings →