Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lennox Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
203
Grants FY2024still arriving
29
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$4.5MEnvironment$4.0MHealth$2.7MEducation$2.3MHuman Services$2.1MInternational$1.8MAnimals$1.3MPhilanthropy$1.1MOther$0
02FY2024 · 203 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k147 grants · $712k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $304k
  • $50k–250k37 grants · $3.2M
$7,500
Median grant
29
States reached
$43M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATURE CONSERVANCY$200,000
WOOD RIVER LAND TRUST COMPANY$100,000
THE ARC OF THE FARMINGTON VALLEY INC$100,000
CAMP CHIPPEWA FOUNDATION$100,000
PROJECT ANGEL HEART$100,000
DIFFVELOPMENT$100,000
ANIMAL SHELTER OF WOOD RIVER VALLEY$100,000
MANO A MANO INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS$100,000
MONTANA SKATEPARK ASSOCIATION$100,000
HIGHLAND HOSPITAL OF ROCHESTER$100,000
BRIDGE$100,000
FRIENDS OF WILLOW CREEK OF SAUSALITO$100,000
HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC$100,000
STEAMBOAT HEALTH & RECREATION ASSOCIATION$100,000
BRIDGER SKI FOUNDATION$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $3.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%KARE: $15k → 11%ARKANSAS ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $8k → 17%KENNEBEC VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $98k → 12%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $8k → 12%I LIVE TO WPD: $30k → 17%KENNEBEC VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $96k → 12%BRIDGE: $100k → 12%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $8k → 12%I LIVE TO WPD: $15k → 17%KENNEBEC VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $89k → 12%BRIDGE: $100k → 12%THE ARC OF THE FARMINGTON VALLEY INC: $100k → 11%THE TREEHOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $100k → 12%THE ARC OF THE FARMINGTON VALLEY INC: $100k → 11%THE TREEHOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $100k → 12%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $8k → 10%THE ARC OF THE FARMINGTON VALLEY INC: $100k → 11%THE TREEHOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $100k → 12%THE ARC OF THE FARMINGTON VALLEY INC: $100k → 11%THE TREEHOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $100k → 12%BERKSHIRE RESOURCES FOR INTEGRATION OF DIVERSE GRO: $8k → 8%THE TREEHOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $25k → 12%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $98k → 10%FOOD FOR ALL SERVICES: $8k → 7%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST VENT: $100k → 10%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $25k → 10%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST VENT: $100k → 10%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $14k → 10%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST VENT: $25k → 10%HOSPICE OF SOUTHERN MAINE: $100k → 7%HOSPICE OF SOUTHERN MAINE: $100k → 7%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST VENT: $100k → 10%HOSPICE OF SOUTHERN MAINE: $25k → 7%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST VENT: $100k → 10%HOSPICE OF SOUTHERN MAINE: $25k → 7%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST VENT: $50k → 10%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST VENT: $45k → 10%NORTHAMPTON NEIGHBORS INC: $8k → 12%PREBLE STREET: $100k → 7%HOLYOKE HOCKEY CLUB INC: $8k → 12%PREBLE STREET: $100k → 7%PREBLE STREET: $100k → 7%SPUR COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $85k → 7%PREBLE STREET: $100k → 7%YMCA OF GREATER ROCHESTER: $100k → 14%PREBLE STREET: $50k → 7%HOUSE OF MERCY INC: $8k → 14%PREBLE STREET: $15k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
WY
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Lennox Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Lennox Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 9.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$20M · 188 repeat orgs$2.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

188 repeat relationships: 97 still active in FY2024, 91 since wound down; 68 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

188
172

Total granted

$20M
$1.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+27%

Still filing today

88%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $901k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEnvironmentAnimalsHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MANO A MANO INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS
    7× · 2018–2024 · $701k · revenue +19%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $672k · revenue +37%
  • HI
    HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $665k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • MC
    MID-IOWA COMMUNITY ACTION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $150k · revenue -9%
  • TF
    THE FOUNDATION STEAMBOAT SPRINGS WINTER SPORTS CLUBgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +132%
  • YMCA OF GREATER ROCHESTER (4368)
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
2
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
3
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
4
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
5
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
6
Wildearth Guardians

Wildearth guardians works to protect and restore the wildlife, wild places, wild rivers, and health of the american west.

Unclassified
7
Alaska Whale Foundation

Alaska Whale Foundation is dedicated to marine mammal conservation through research monitoring and education.

Environment
8
San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory

The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.

Environment
9
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
10
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
11
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
12
California Coastkeeper dba California Coastkeeper Alliance

California Coastkeeper Alliance unites Waterkeeper programs statewide to fight for swimmable, fishable, and drinkable waters for all Californians.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is Happy Birthday Cha Cha Cha. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

372 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 372 of the 442 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

13
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
93
Early backer (in before they grew)
363/372
Grantees still filing
262/372
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $850,745 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF TEXAS: $557,500 · OtherSTEAMBOAT SPRINGS WINTER SPORTS CLUB INC: $451,000 · OtherBERKSHIRE TACONIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $450,000 · OtherMANO A MANO INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS: $701,000 · OtherMANO A MANO INTERNATIONAL PARTNERSANIMAL SHELTER OF WOOD RIVER VALLEY DBA MOUNTAIN HUMANE: $746,500 · OtherANIMAL SHELTER OF WOOD RIVER VALLEY DBA MOUNTAIN HUM…NAOMI'S VILLAGE INC: $589,707 · OtherNAOMI'S VILLAGE INCBoys & Girls Clubs of Southern Maine: $373,500 · OtherDIFFvelopment: $385,000 · Other+93 more: $5,769,238 · Other+93 moreMONTANA SKATEPARK ASSOCIATION: $700,000 · Recreation & SportsMONTANA SKATEPAR…HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $665,000 · Recreation & SportsHOLE IN THE WALL…STEAMBOAT HEALTH & RECREATION ASSOC: $509,000 · Recreation & SportsSTEAMBOAT HEALTH…BERKSHIRE SOUTH REGIONAL COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $465,000 · Recreation & SportsBERKSHIRE SOUTH …SANTA FE SKI TEAM INC: $281,734 · Recreation & SportsSANTA FE SKI TEA…ST PAUL URBAN TENNIS PROGRAM: $153,500 · Recreation & SportsPortland Community Squash: $152,500 · Recreation & SportsBRIDGER SKI FOUNDATION: $152,500 · Recreation & Sports+5 more: $248,750 · Recreation & Sports+5 moreYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST VENTURA COUNTY: $520,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MENS CHR…PREBLE STREET: $466,000 · Human ServicesPREBLE STREETTHE TREEHOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $443,000 · Human ServicesTHE TREEHOUSE …THE ARC OF THE FARMINGTON VALLEY INC: $401,000 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF THE…KENNEBEC VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $282,997 · Human ServicesKENNEBEC VALLE…Hospice of Southern Maine: $250,000 · Human ServicesHospice of Sou…BERSHIRE RESOURCES FOR INTEGRATION OF DIVERSE GROUPS & EDUCATION INC BRIDGE: $208,500 · Human ServicesBERSHIRE RESOU…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $148,700 · Human Services+9 more: $321,750 · Human Services+9 moreUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $500,000 · EducationUC SAN DIE…NORTHAMPTON MONTESSORI SOCIETY INC: $285,000 · EducationNORTHAMPTO…Fayetteville Public Library Foundation: $285,000 · EducationFayettevil…ACADEMY FOR GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP CHARTER SCHOOL: $212,000 · EducationACADEMY FO…Missoula Curling Club: $201,000 · EducationMissoula C…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $185,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY…One Spark Foundation Inc: $76,500 · Education+16 more: $421,500 · Education+16 moreWOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO: $351,720 · EnvironmentNEW ENGLAND FORESTRY FOUNDATION INC: $225,000 · EnvironmentCape Elizabeth Land Trust: $200,000 · EnvironmentFLYING CLOUD INSTITUTE INC: $112,500 · EnvironmentSANTA BARBARA BOTANIC GARDEN: $100,000 · EnvironmentVENTURA LAND TRUST: $75,000 · EnvironmentThe Coalition of Oregon Land Trusts: $75,000 · EnvironmentPROTECT OUR WINTERS: $71,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $63,600 · EnvironmentMAGIC VALLEY LAND TRUST LLC: $57,500 · EnvironmentEAGLE'S NEST FOUNDATION INC: $51,000 · Environment+6 more: $129,500 · EnvironmentMOFFETT FIELD HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $315,000 · Arts & CultureFriends of Katahdin Woods & Waters: $201,000 · Arts & CultureSANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $200,000 · Arts & CulturePALO ALTO ART CENTER FOUNDATION: $143,500 · Arts & CultureLOBERO THEATRE FOUNDATION: $125,000 · Arts & CulturePEGASUS EARLY MUSIC: $101,850 · Arts & CultureChildren's Cancer Association: $76,500 · Arts & Culture+7 more: $114,258 · Arts & CulturePLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC: $672,000 · HealthHIGHLAND HOSPITAL OF ROCHESTER: $200,000 · HealthMENDING STRIDES RANCH INC: $96,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Corporation: $70,000 · HealthCLACKAMAS VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $66,000 · Health+9 more: $151,750 · Health
Other$10,874,190Recreation & Sports$3,327,984Human Services$3,041,947Education$2,166,000Environment$1,511,820Arts & Culture$1,277,108Health$1,255,750

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $850,745 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL SHELTER OF WOOD RIVER VALLEY DBA MOUNTAIN HUMANE: $746,500 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetMANO A MANO INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS: $701,000 over 7y, 4.2% of budgetMONTANA SKATEPARK ASSOCIATION: $700,000 over 7y, 50% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC: $672,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $665,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetNAOMI'S VILLAGE INC: $589,707 over 6y, 4.6% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST VENTURA COUNTY: $520,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetSTEAMBOAT HEALTH & RECREATION ASSOC: $509,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $500,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPREBLE STREET: $466,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetBERKSHIRE SOUTH REGIONAL COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $465,000 over 7y, 4.2% of budgetSTEAMBOAT SPRINGS WINTER SPORTS CLUB INC: $451,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetBERKSHIRE TACONIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $450,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTHE TREEHOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $443,000 over 8y, 19% of budgetTHE ARC OF THE FARMINGTON VALLEY INC: $401,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetDIFFvelopment: $385,000 over 6y, 52% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Southern Maine: $373,500 over 7y, 4.1% of budgetWOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO: $351,720 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetMOFFETT FIELD HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $315,000 over 5y, 44% of budgetNORTHAMPTON MONTESSORI SOCIETY INC: $285,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetFayetteville Public Library Foundation: $285,000 over 7y, 4.5% of budgetKENNEBEC VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $282,997 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSANTA FE SKI TEAM INC: $281,734 over 3y, 45% of budgetHospice of Southern Maine: $250,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER SAN FRANCISCO: $240,000 over 7y, 5.9% of budgetCamp Chippewa Foundation: $232,500 over 7y, 8.4% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR ICHTHYOSIS AND RELATED SKIN TYPES INC: $231,066 over 5y, 12% of budgetTHE SPARK FOUNDATION INC % MAX MAHLER: $226,443 over 3y, 45% of budgetNEW ENGLAND FORESTRY FOUNDATION INC: $225,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetACADEMY FOR GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP CHARTER SCHOOL: $212,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetBERSHIRE RESOURCES FOR INTEGRATION OF DIVERSE GROUPS & EDUCATION INC BRIDGE: $208,500 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetRocky Mountain Institute: $201,808 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFriends of Katahdin Woods & Waters: $201,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetMissoula Curling Club: $201,000 over 3y, 59% of budgetSANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $200,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetHIGHLAND HOSPITAL OF ROCHESTER: $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCape Elizabeth Land Trust: $200,000 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $185,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPORTLAND WHEELERS: $182,000 over 5y, 35% of budgetST PAUL URBAN TENNIS PROGRAM: $153,500 over 5y, 11% of budgetFoundation for Portland Public Schools: $152,500 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetPortland Community Squash: $152,500 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetBRIDGER SKI FOUNDATION: $152,500 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetRoutt County Humane Society: $151,000 over 8y, 13% of budgetCOMMUNITY FDN OF GREATER DES MOINES F/K/A GREATER DES MOINES COMMUNITY FDN: $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMID-IOWA COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $150,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $148,700 over 5y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL SHELTER OF WOOD RIVER VALLEY DBA MOUNTAIN HUMANE ↗
  • Who funds MANO A MANO INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA SKATEPARK ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NAOMI'S VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST VENTURA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds STEAMBOAT HEALTH & RECREATION ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PREBLE STREET ↗
  • Who funds BERKSHIRE SOUTH REGIONAL COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds STEAMBOAT SPRINGS WINTER SPORTS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds BERKSHIRE TACONIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TREEHOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF THE FARMINGTON VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds DIFFvelopment ↗
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Southern Maine ↗
  • Who funds WOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO ↗
  • Who funds MOFFETT FIELD HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHAMPTON MONTESSORI SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Fayetteville Public Library Foundation ↗
  • Who funds KENNEBEC VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE SKI TEAM INC ↗
  • Who funds Hospice of Southern Maine ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds Camp Chippewa Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR ICHTHYOSIS AND RELATED SKIN TYPES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SPARK FOUNDATION INC % MAX MAHLER ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND FORESTRY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ACADEMY FOR GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds BERSHIRE RESOURCES FOR INTEGRATION OF DIVERSE GROUPS & EDUCATION INC BRIDGE ↗
  • Who funds Rocky Mountain Institute ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Katahdin Woods & Waters ↗
  • Who funds Missoula Curling Club ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cabin FoundationME46.6× affinity20 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cabin Foundation · Onion Foundation · Elmina B Sewall Foundation · Horizon Foundation Inc · Sam L Cohen Foundation · Maine Community Foundation Inc · The Widgeon Point Charitable Foundation · Fisher Charitable Foundation · Saco & Biddeford Savings Charitable Foundation · United Way Inc · Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · Ro Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lennox Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lennox Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 130%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • New England Forestry Foundation Inc: 88% of income from government
  • The Arc of the Farmington Valley Inc: 86% of income from government
  • Tapestry Health Systems Inc: 60% of income from government
  • Special Olympics Connecticut Inc: 42% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • National Fallen Firefighters Foundation: 24% of income from government
  • The Treehouse Foundation Inc: 23% of income from government
  • The Coalition of Oregon Land Trusts: 18% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Clackamas Volunteers in Medicine: 7% of income from government
  • Flying Cloud Institute Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Construct Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Clearwater Marine Aquarium Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Amherst College Trustees: 0% of income from government
  • Choate Rosemary Hall Foundation Incorporated: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
13get no government money at all
45report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lennox Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lennox Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 442 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lennox’s filings →

More from the funding graph