Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lena Sue and C Grier Beam Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$192kReligion$33kEducation$24kArts & Culture$22kHousing & Shelter$14kAnimals$12kHuman Services$12kPublic Safety & Disaster$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$750
Median grant
3
States reached
$660k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSP$10,000
LEVINE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$7,500
BELOVED ASHEVILLE$5,000
GASTON COLLEGE FOUNDATION$2,500
HOLY ANGELS INC$2,500
TRI-COUNTY ANIMAL RESCUE$1,000
THE NORTH CAROLINA PUBLIC TELEVISIO$750
BROTHER WOLF ANIMAL RESCUE$500
TAR RIVER LAND CONSERVANCY$500
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$500
THE UPPER ROOM$500
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$250
JEFF GORDON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CAMP KESEM: $400 → 14%MISERICORDIA HOME: $250 → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $3k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $2k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $2k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $2k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
CT
CA
VA
KS
AR
TN
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$310k · 24 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
15

Total granted

$310k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+64%

Still filing today

63%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsHousing & ShelterEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +145%
  • AH
    ATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $53k · revenue +195%
  • HA
    HOLY ANGELS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $21k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • CH
    CHERRYVILLE HIGH SCHOOL EDUCATION FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +119%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDRENgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +106%
  • ST
    SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
2
City of Hope National Medical Center

City of Hope National Medical Center's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
3
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
4
Carolina Medicorp Enterprises Inc

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…

—
5
One World Surgery

One world surgery's mission is to ignite the spirit of service and transform lives by providing access to high-quality surgical care globally.

International
6
Gaston Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc

To engage and inspire our community to support caromont health in providing compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

Health
7
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
8
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
9
Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.

Animals
10
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
11
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
12
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Holy Angels Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tri-County Animal Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
22/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $90,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $52,500 · HealthATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION+2 more: $4,250 · HealthFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $33,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHHOLY ANGELS INC: $20,500 · OtherHOLY ANGELS INCLEVINE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $15,000 · OtherLEVINE CHILDREN'S HOSPITALUPPER ROOM: $4,149 · OtherCHERRYVILLE AREA MINISTRIES: $4,100 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $4,000 · OtherJeff Gordon Childrens Foundation: $4,750 · Other+18 more: $28,800 · Other+18 moreGASTON COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $12,500 · EducationCHERRYVILLE HIGH SCHOOL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,500 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $4,750 · Human Services+2 more: $650 · Human ServicesC GRIER BEAM TRUCK MUSEUM: $15,000 · Arts & CultureTRI-COUNTY ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $9,000 · AnimalsBrother Wolf Animal Rescue Inc: $2,000 · AnimalsASHEVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $500 · AnimalsBELOVED ASHEVILLE: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterCROSS CONNECTION INC: $500 · Housing & Shelter
Health$146,750Other$114,299Education$17,500Human Services$15,900Arts & Culture$15,000Animals$11,500Housing & Shelter$10,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $90,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $52,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHOLY ANGELS INC: $20,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetC GRIER BEAM TRUCK MUSEUM: $15,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetGASTON COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBELOVED ASHEVILLE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRI-COUNTY ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $9,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetCHERRYVILLE HIGH SCHOOL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetJeff Gordon Childrens Foundation: $4,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $4,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBrother Wolf Animal Rescue Inc: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $2,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSERIOUSFUN CHILDREN'S NETWORK: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTAR RIVER LAND CONSERVANCY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGASTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $794 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD CONNECTION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASHEVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROSS CONNECTION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCamp Kesem National: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISERICORDIA HOME: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOLY ANGELS INC ↗
  • Who funds C GRIER BEAM TRUCK MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds GASTON COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds BELOVED ASHEVILLE ↗
  • Who funds TRI-COUNTY ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHERRYVILLE HIGH SCHOOL EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Jeff Gordon Childrens Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds Brother Wolf Animal Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SERIOUSFUN CHILDREN'S NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds TAR RIVER LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds GASTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD CONNECTION INC ↗
  • Who funds ASHEVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds HEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CROSS CONNECTION INC ↗
  • Who funds Camp Kesem National ↗
  • Who funds Guitars For Vets Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke Energy FoundationNC17× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lena Sue and C Grier Beam Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lena Sue and C Grier Beam Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lena Sue and C Grier Beam Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lena Sue and C Grier Beam Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lena Sue and C Grier Beam Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph