Skip to content

· Public charity

Lehigh Valley Workforce Investment Board Inc

To implement a pa careerlink delivery system which serves our community as a clearinghouse of resources, inclusive of all information, employment opportunities, training and education options and economic development.

$6.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$5.7M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$38MEmployment$1.8MHealth$1.1MCommunity Improvement$318kHuman Services$164kYouth Development$105k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $112k
  • $250k+2 grants · $6.0M
$305,265
Median grant
3
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EDUCATIONAL DATA SYSTEMS INC$5,678,411
ST LUKE'S HOSPITAL AND HEALTH$305,265
PROJECT OF EASTON$61,147
GERMAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$50,897
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $538k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ECKERD: $24k → 12%PROJECT OF EASTON: $76k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $70k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $67k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $66k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $61k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $46k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $22k → 11%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE: $76k → 11%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE: $29k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$41M · 18 repeat orgs$476k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
7

Total granted

$41M
$476k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+38%

Still filing today

44%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    ST LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM PA
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +129%
  • PO
    PROJECT OF EASTON INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $409k · revenue +114%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOME OF EASTON INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $141k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • LC
    LEHIGH CARBON COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2019 · $176k
  • GL
    GREATER LEHIGH VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $124k · revenue +38%
  • LE
    LV ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2018 · $105k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
2
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
3
Elizabethtown College

Provide a transformative educational experience that cultivates strengths of its students.

Education
4
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
5
Lehigh Valley Health Network

We heal, comfort, and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value supported by education and clinical research.

—
6
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
7
York College of Pennsylvania

York college prepares graduates for fulfilling, productive, and purposeful lives by providing high quality programs of study supported by relevant real-world experiences. continued on schedule o.as a rich and diverse community of educators…

Education
8
Springside Chestnut Hill Academy

See schedule owe are an inclusive community on a mission to inspire unbounded curiosity and independent thought in every one of our students. in a unique educational environment that extends well beyond campus, we nurture students'…

Education
9
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
10
Pocono Health System

We heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value supported by education and clinical research.

—
11
Lehigh Valley Economic Development Corporation (Lvedc)

The mission of the lehigh valley economic development corporation is to market the economic assets of the lehigh valley and to create partnerships to support the recruitment, growth and retention of employers, and the creation of jobs for…

Community Improvement
12
21ST Century Cyber Charter School

Empower all students and families to become active participants in their own learning and equip them with skills for the future. we achieve this through engaging content, delvered by innovative teaching in a culture of caring.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Eckerd Youth Alternatives Inc; the most unlike its peers is St Luke's Hospital of Bethlehem Pa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EDUCATIONAL DATA SYSTEMS INC: $36,413,899 · OtherEDUCATIONAL DATA SYSTEMS INC+18 more: $2,940,510 · Other+18 moreST LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM PA: $1,093,412 · HealthPROJECT OF EASTON INC: $408,805 · Human ServicesVALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $104,954 · Human ServicesECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC: $23,865 · Human ServicesLEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $24,999 · EducationBUILDING 21: $23,525 · Education
Other$39,354,409Health$1,093,412Human Services$537,624Education$48,524

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM PA: $1,093,412 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT OF EASTON INC: $408,805 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME OF EASTON INC: $141,213 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetGREATER LEHIGH VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $123,736 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetGerman American Chamber Of Commerce Inc: $118,040 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetVALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $104,954 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA INC: $87,665 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMANUFACTURERS RESOURCE CENTER: $25,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $24,999 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC: $23,865 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUILDING 21: $23,525 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCENTURY PROMISE: $12,347 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM PA ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT OF EASTON INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME OF EASTON INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER LEHIGH VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds German American Chamber Of Commerce Inc ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA INC ↗
  • Who funds MANUFACTURERS RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LEHIGH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds BUILDING 21 ↗
  • Who funds CENTURY PROMISE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of the Greater Lehigh ValleyPA17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of the Greater Lehigh Valley · Air Products Foundation · Shaffer Family Charitable Trust · Frederick H Bedford Jr & Margaret S Bedford Charitable Foundation · Lehigh Valley Community Foundation · Ppl Foundation · Dollar General Literacy Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lehigh Valley Workforce Investment Board Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lehigh Valley Workforce Investment Board Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Eckerd Youth Alternatives Inc: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lehigh Valley Workforce Investment Board’s filings →

More from the funding graph