Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Shaffer Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$610k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fund
0183% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$3.1MEducation$478kHuman Services$427kHousing & Shelter$325kHealth$224kReligion$138kFood & Nutrition$135kYouth Development$125kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $165k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $175k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF GREATER LEHIGH VALLEY$250,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY$125,000
ST LUKE'S HOSPITAL$50,000
NEW BETHANY MINISTRIES$35,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
THE CHILDREN'S HOME OF EASTON$20,000
HISPANIC CENTER LEHIGH VALLEY$20,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
EASTER SEALS EASTERN PA$10,000
ALLENTOWN SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION$7,500
MILLER-KEYSTONE BLOOD CENTER$5,250
Individual grant recipient$5,000
STEPHEN'S PLACE$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $224k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $20k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $20k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $20k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $20k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $20k → 11%THIRD STREET ALLIANCE FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN: $5k → 11%THIRD STREET ALLIANCE FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN: $5k → 11%THIRD STREET ALLIANCE FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN: $3k → 11%HISPANIC CENTER LEHIGH VALLEY: $25k → 11%HISPANIC CENTER LEHIGH VALLEY: $25k → 11%HISPANIC CENTER LEHIGH VALLEY: $20k → 11%HISPANIC CENTER LEHIGH VALLEY: $20k → 11%LEHIGH VALLEY CHILDREN'S CENTERS: $5k → 11%LEHIGH VALLEY CHILDREN'S CENTERS: $5k → 11%SHANTHI PROJECT: $6k → 11%SHANTHI PROJECT: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.3M · 31 repeat orgs$115k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
13

Total granted

$4.3M
$115k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+133%

Still filing today

58%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NB
    NEW BETHANY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $280k · revenue +28%
  • CI
    COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $175k · revenue +118%
  • SL
    ST LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM PA
    3× · 2022–2024 · $150k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2017 · $33k
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BRITH SHOLOM
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • AA
    ALLENTOWN AREA ECUMENICAL FOOD BANKgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +62%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh Valley Physician Group

Establish and maintain a medical group consisting of clinicians employed by lehigh valley health network. this medical group will fulfill the charitable mission of promoting community health through health education, injury prevention, and…

Health
2
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
3
Elwyn of Pennsylvania and Delaware

Elwyn makes life better for people with developmental and behavioral health challenges.

Human Services
4
Lehigh Valley Hospital - Pocono

Our mission is who we are and what we do: to provide world class care close to home. our vision is what we aim for to best serve our community: to build a healthier community.

Health
5
Lehigh Valley Hospital-Hazleton

We heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and clinical research.

Health
6
Highmark Health Group

Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…

7
Literacy Council of Lanc-Leb Lva

Our mission is success through lifelong learning and learning for life. our vision is for adults to have the skills to transform their lives, sustain their families and strengthen their communities.

Education
8
Philhaven

Philhaven promotes hope, healing and wholeness through the provision of behavioral resources.

Health
9
Community Action Committee of the Lehigh Valley Inc

The mission of the community action committee of the lehigh valley is to improve the quality of life in the lehigh valley by building a community in which all people have access to economic opportunity, the ability to pursue that…

10
Via of the Lehigh Valley Inc

To help people reach their full potential through a rewarding career, meaningful relationships, and an enriching community life. Via creates pathways to success through vocation, inclusion, and advocacy.

Human Services
11
Latin American Community Center Inc

To empower the latino community through education, advocacy, partnerships and exceptional services

Human Services
12
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Home of Easton Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hawk Mountain Sanctuary Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Hospital SystemsRegional Economic Developme…Youth and Family Support Se…Senior Housing & Support Se…Charter and Independent Sch…Community Support ServicesArts & Cultural Education O…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 52 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr15%11%20–35yr16%44%35–55yr17%41%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr15%5%20–35yr16%28%35–55yr17%67%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/29
the rest of the field
10%
306/3,161

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/27
Grantees still filing
22/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF GREATER LEHIGH VALLEY — $2,130,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF GREATER LEHIGH VALLEYNEW BETHANY INC — $280,000 · OtherNEW BETHANY INCCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA INC — $175,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $160,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $140,000 · Other+27 more — $906,640 · Other+27 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY — $1,000,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION O…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $300,000 · Education+1 more — $2,500 · EducationPROJECT OF EASTON INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesHISPANIC CENTER LEHIGH VALLEY — $90,000 · Human ServicesTHIRD STREET ALLIANCE FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN — $12,500 · Human ServicesSHANTHI PROJECT — $11,000 · Human ServicesLEHIGH VALLEY CHILDREN'S CENTERS INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesST LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM PA — $150,000 · HealthHCSC - BLOOD CENTER — $24,250 · HealthMEALS ON WHEELS OF THE GREATER LEHIGH VALLEY INC — $120,000 · Food & NutritionALLENTOWN AREA ECUMENICAL FOOD BANK — $10,000 · Food & NutritionBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ALLENTOWN INC — $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentMINSI TRAILS COUNCIL #502 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $30,000 · Youth Development
Other$3,791,640Philanthropy$1,000,000Education$302,500Human Services$223,500Health$174,250Food & Nutrition$130,000Youth Development$65,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY — $1,000,000 over 8y, 4.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $300,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW BETHANY INC — $280,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA INC — $175,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetST LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM PA — $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF THE GREATER LEHIGH VALLEY INC — $120,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetPROJECT OF EASTON INC — $100,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME OF EASTON INC — $100,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetHISPANIC CENTER LEHIGH VALLEY — $90,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetALLENTOWN SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC — $42,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ALLENTOWN INC — $35,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMINSI TRAILS COUNCIL #502 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $30,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHCSC - BLOOD CENTER — $24,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LEHIGH CONFERENCE OF CHURCHES — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSTEPHENS PLACE — $14,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetTHIRD STREET ALLIANCE FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN — $12,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSHANTHI PROJECT — $11,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetALLENTOWN AREA ECUMENICAL FOOD BANK — $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetLEHIGH VALLEY CHILDREN'S CENTERS INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFUND TO BENEFIT CHILDREN AND YOUTH INC — $7,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetHAWK MOUNTAIN SANCTUARY ASSOCIATION — $7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMOSSER VILLAGE FAMILY CENTER — $6,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF LEHIGH COUNTY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE DA VINCI DISCOVERY CENTER OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICES FOR CHILDREN INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds NEW BETHANY INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA INC
  • Who funds ST LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM PA
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF THE GREATER LEHIGH VALLEY INC
  • Who funds PROJECT OF EASTON INC
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME OF EASTON INC
  • Who funds HISPANIC CENTER LEHIGH VALLEY
  • Who funds ALLENTOWN SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ALLENTOWN INC
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC
  • Who funds MINSI TRAILS COUNCIL #502 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
  • Who funds HCSC - BLOOD CENTER
  • Who funds THE LEHIGH CONFERENCE OF CHURCHES
  • Who funds STEPHENS PLACE
  • Who funds THIRD STREET ALLIANCE FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN
  • Who funds SHANTHI PROJECT
  • Who funds ALLENTOWN AREA ECUMENICAL FOOD BANK
  • Who funds LEHIGH VALLEY CHILDREN'S CENTERS INC
  • Who funds FUND TO BENEFIT CHILDREN AND YOUTH INC
  • Who funds HAWK MOUNTAIN SANCTUARY ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds MOSSER VILLAGE FAMILY CENTER
  • Who funds COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lehigh Valley Community FoundationPA51.1× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lehigh Valley Community Foundation · United Way of the Greater Lehigh Valley · Air Products Foundation · Ross J Born and Wendy G Born Charitable Trust · Sylvia Perkin Perpetual Charitable Trust · The Century Fund Trust · Harry C Trexler Estate · Ppl Foundation · Martin Guitar Charitable Foundation · Frederick H Bedford Jr & Margaret S Bedford Charitable Foundation · The Donald B and Dorothy L Stabler Foundation · Julius & Katheryn Hommer Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Shaffer Family Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph