Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Lehigh Valley Workforce Investment Board Inc

To implement a pa careerlink delivery system which serves our community as a clearinghouse of resources, inclusive of all information, employment opportunities, training and education options and economic development.

$6.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$5.7M
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 96% of LEHIGH VALLEY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $112k
  • $250k+2 grants · $6.0M
$305,265
Median grant
3
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EDUCATIONAL DATA SYSTEMS INC$5,678,411
ST LUKE'S HOSPITAL AND HEALTH$305,265
PROJECT OF EASTON$61,147
GERMAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$50,897
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $538k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ECKERD: $24k → 12%PROJECT OF EASTON: $76k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $70k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $67k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $66k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $61k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $46k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $22k → 11%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE: $76k → 11%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE: $29k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$41M · 18 repeat orgs$476k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +74% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
7

Total granted

$41M
$476k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+38%

Still filing today

44%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    ST LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM PA
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +129%
  • PO
    PROJECT OF EASTON INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $409k · revenue +114%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOME OF EASTON INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $141k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • LC
    LEHIGH CARBON COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2019 · $176k
  • GL
    GREATER LEHIGH VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $124k · revenue +38%
  • LE
    LV ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2018 · $105k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
2
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
3
Elizabethtown College

Provide a transformative educational experience that cultivates strengths of its students.

Education
4
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

5
Lehigh Valley Health Network

We heal, comfort, and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value supported by education and clinical research.

6
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
7
York College of Pennsylvania

York college prepares graduates for fulfilling, productive, and purposeful lives by providing high quality programs of study supported by relevant real-world experiences. continued on schedule o.as a rich and diverse community of educators…

Education
8
Springside Chestnut Hill Academy

See schedule owe are an inclusive community on a mission to inspire unbounded curiosity and independent thought in every one of our students. in a unique educational environment that extends well beyond campus, we nurture students'…

Education
9
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
10
Pocono Health System

We heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value supported by education and clinical research.

11
Lehigh Valley Economic Development Corporation (Lvedc)

The mission of the lehigh valley economic development corporation is to market the economic assets of the lehigh valley and to create partnerships to support the recruitment, growth and retention of employers, and the creation of jobs for…

Community Improvement
12
21ST Century Cyber Charter School

Empower all students and families to become active participants in their own learning and equip them with skills for the future. we achieve this through engaging content, delvered by innovative teaching in a culture of caring.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Eckerd Youth Alternatives Inc and the most unlike its peers is St Luke's Hospital of Bethlehem Pa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EDUCATIONAL DATA SYSTEMS INC — $36,413,899 · OtherEDUCATIONAL DATA SYSTEMS INC+18 more — $2,940,510 · Other+18 moreST LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM PA — $1,093,412 · HealthPROJECT OF EASTON INC — $408,805 · Human ServicesVALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC — $104,954 · Human ServicesECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC — $23,865 · Human ServicesLEHIGH UNIVERSITY — $24,999 · EducationBUILDING 21 — $23,525 · Education
Other$39,354,409Health$1,093,412Human Services$537,624Education$48,524

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM PA — $1,093,412 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT OF EASTON INC — $408,805 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME OF EASTON INC — $141,213 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetGREATER LEHIGH VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $123,736 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetGerman American Chamber Of Commerce Inc — $118,040 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetVALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC — $104,954 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA INC — $87,665 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMANUFACTURERS RESOURCE CENTER — $25,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLEHIGH UNIVERSITY — $24,999 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC — $23,865 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUILDING 21 — $23,525 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCENTURY PROMISE — $12,347 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM PA
  • Who funds PROJECT OF EASTON INC
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME OF EASTON INC
  • Who funds GREATER LEHIGH VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
  • Who funds German American Chamber Of Commerce Inc
  • Who funds VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA INC
  • Who funds MANUFACTURERS RESOURCE CENTER
  • Who funds LEHIGH UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC
  • Who funds BUILDING 21
  • Who funds CENTURY PROMISE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of the Greater Lehigh ValleyPA17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of the Greater Lehigh Valley · Air Products Foundation · Shaffer Family Charitable Trust · Frederick H Bedford Jr & Margaret S Bedford Charitable Foundation · Lehigh Valley Community Foundation · Ppl Foundation · Dollar General Literacy Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lehigh Valley Workforce Investment Board Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Eckerd Youth Alternatives Inc12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph