· Public charity
Legacy Collective
LEGACY COLLECTIVE works to solve systemic issues by funding the most sustainable, innovative efforts through partnerships with nonprofit organizations locally and globally.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 25 grants below total $356,810 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $382,893 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $26,083 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $38k
- $10k–50k20 grants · $318k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CAFE MOMENTUM | $28,758 |
| HELP ONE NOW | $27,736 |
| THE TREVOR PROJECT | $24,373 |
| HALLE PROJECT | $18,304 |
| LOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER | $18,000 |
| KESHET | $18,000 |
| ARTISTS ATHLETES ACTIVISTS | $15,938 |
| EVERY MEAL | $15,000 |
| ROOT CAPITAL | $15,000 |
| MIRACLE FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| FREE MOM HUGS INC | $14,250 |
| KALEIDOSCOPE YOUTH CENTER | $14,250 |
| THE LIAM FOUNDATION | $14,250 |
| STAND WITH TRANS | $14,250 |
| THE REAL MAMA BEARS | $13,395 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $273k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $181k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FEFAMILY ELDERCARE INC2× · 2022–2023 · $64k · revenue +27%
TREVOR PROJECT INC2× · 2022–2024 · $57k · revenue +32%- CMCAFE MOMENTUM2× · 2023–2024 · $46k · revenue +4%
Funded once
- LDLOVE DOES PARADEone grant, 2022 · $76k · revenue -24%
- RORED OAK HOPEone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +3%
- GEGLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INCone grant, 2023 · $38k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.
To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…
Covenant house new orleans (the organization) is a not-for-profit organization affiliated with 34 similar organizations across five countries, all of which are affiliates of covenant house international (parent affiliate) and share a…
InReach fka AsylumConnect is a trans-led tech nonprofit dedicated to building the world's first open source verified LGBTQ+ resource platform. InReach's free platform connects LGBTQ+ people facing persecution or discrimination with a range…
To provide leadership and professional development, education and research to create workplaces free from discrimination.
All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)
To promote and protect human rights in the United States and around the world.
Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…
Global child advocates is a dedicated team of child protection specialists whose mission is to strengthen the layers of protection around children to prevent abuse, trafficking, and exploitation.
In 34 cities across five countries, covenant house builds bridges to hope for young people facing homelessness and survivors of human trafficking. we meet their immediate needs for food, clothing, protection, and medical and mental health…
Safehouse denver assists adult, children, and youth in reclaiming their right to a life free from domestic violence. the agency provides a broad spectrum of culturally competent, trauma-informed services, including but not limited to,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Free Mom Hugs Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mama Bears. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LOVE DOES PARADE ↗
- Who funds FAMILY ELDERCARE INC ↗
- Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds RED OAK HOPE ↗
- Who funds CAFE MOMENTUM ↗
- Who funds FREE MOM HUGS INC ↗
- Who funds THE GLOBAL VILLAGE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds EVERY MEAL ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds Kaleidoscope Youth Center Inc ↗
- Who funds KESHET ↗
- Who funds Ugandan Water Project ↗
- Who funds RAPE CRISIS CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds TRANSFORMATIONS BY AUSTIN ANGELS ↗
- Who funds HALLE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN MOTHERS HEALTH INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds HELP ONE NOW ↗
- Who funds THE TYLER CLEMENTI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AFFIRMING YOUTH MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds CASA OF JOHNSON & WYANDOTTE COUNTIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHICAGO SCHOLARS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CITY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds HAVEN-REFUGE FOR PREGNANCY AND BIRTH ↗
- Who funds FOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Salt and Light Works ↗
- Who funds BELOVED ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds REBECCA BENDER INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds ONE WILLCO ↗
- Who funds FREEDHEARTS INC ↗
- Who funds EQUALITY CREW ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds TEXAS HEALTH ACTION ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds RESOURCE CENTER OF DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE WASHINGTON DC ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER ↗
- Who funds Gender Spectrum Charitable Fund ↗
- Who funds GLSEN INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Centerlink Inc · Austin Community Foundation Inc · Pure Inc · United Way Worldwide · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · United Way for Greater Austin · Texas Women's Foundation · Dallas Jewish Community Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · McKesson Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Legacy Collective funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Root Capital Inc — 9% of income from government
- Global Empowerment Mission Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Legacy Collective?
Find your warmest path to Legacy Collective through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.