Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lecoque Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$675kArts & Culture$83kHuman Services$19kHealth$16kRecreation & Sports$6kHousing & Shelter$3kPhilanthropy$2kCrime & Legal$1k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$163k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF MCC FOUNDATION$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PIONEER CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $5k → 6%PIONEER CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $5k → 6%PIONEER CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $3k → 6%PIONEER CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $1k → 6%PIONEER CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $1k → 6%SAGE YMCA: $5k → 6%SAGE YMCA: $5k → 6%SAGE YMCA: $1k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$790k · 10 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
6

Total granted

$790k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+113%

Still filing today

80%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LL
    LAKESIDE LEGACY FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $653k · revenue +77%
  • PC
    Pioneer Center for Human Services
    4× · 2019–2022 · $15k · revenue +31%
  • RC
    RAUE CENTER FOR THE ARTS
    3× · 2020–2022 · $5k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • SS
    SENIOR SERVICES CAPITAL CAMPAIGN
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • MC
    MCHENRY COUNTY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF MCHENRY COUNTY COLLEGE F
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Child Advocacy Center of Mchenry Co Inc

Provide Counselors in Child Abuse Situations

Crime & Legal
2
Chicago Cultural Alliance

The Chicago Cultural Alliances mission is to connect, promote, and support centers of cultural heritage for a more inclusive Chicago. We are an active consortium of 50 cultural heritage museums, centers, and historical societies that…

Arts & Culture
3
Options and Advocacy for Mchenry County Inc

Empowering individuals with developmental disabilities and their families through advocacy and the coordination of service options

Human Services
4
Chicago Humanities Festival

To promote public appreciation, understanding and support of the humanities through festivals and educational programs.

Arts & Culture
5
Center for Family Services

Administering an array of critical, intensive therapeutic interventions and/or facilitation services to emotionally and behaviorally disturbed clients for whom DCFS is legally responsible in order to stabilize their traditional or home of…

Human Services
6
Music and Dance Theater Chicago Inc
Arts & Culture
7
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Cook County

CASA of Cook County's vision is to protect abused and neglected children by providing them in court, a safe and permanent home, and an opportunity to grow, learn and thrive.

Crime & Legal
8
Mchenry County Economic Development Corporaton

To promote the economic health of mchenry county, il through retention, expansion and attraction of commerce and industry which is conducive to an optimal quality of life for its citizen

—
9
Lakeside Community Committee

To enhance the quality of life for children and families by inspiring hope and empowerment and growth within all whom we serve.

Human Services
10
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Central Illinois

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Central Illinois (RMHCCI) provides programs to support the well-being of children and provides a home away from home for families with children receiving medical care.

—
11
Classical Music Chicago

Presenting free high-quality classical music performances and music education experiences in the Chicago metropolitan area for people of all ages and degrees of musical awareness so they can experience how music enriches life.

Arts & Culture
12
Center for Housing and Health

Chh honors every person's right to a home and health care, by bridging the housing and health care systems, to improve the lives of chicagoans experiencing homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Greater McHENRY County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bargemusic Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LAKESIDE LEGACY FOUNDATION: $652,500 · EducationLAKESIDE LEGACY FOUNDATIONMCHENRY COUNTY YOUTH ORCHESTRA: $74,500 · OtherMCHENRY COUNTY …FRIENDS OF MCC FOUNDATION: $19,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF MCC …SENIOR SERVICES CAPITAL CAMPAIGN: $5,000 · OtherCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CHICAGO: $4,500 · Other+3 more: $7,500 · Other+3 morePioneer Center for Human Services: $14,500 · Human ServicesThe YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago: $11,000 · Human ServicesRAUE CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $4,500 · Arts & CultureBARGEMUSIC LTD: $4,000 · Arts & CultureHome of the Sparrow Inc: $3,000 · Housing & ShelterUNITED WAY OF GREATER McHENRY COUNTY INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyCASA OF MCHENRY COUNTY INC: $1,000 · Crime & LegalThe Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation): $1,000 · Religion
Education$652,500Other$110,500Human Services$25,500Arts & Culture$8,500Housing & Shelter$3,000Philanthropy$2,000Crime & Legal$1,000Religion$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLAKESIDE LEGACY FOUNDATION: $652,500 over 7y, 24% of budgetPioneer Center for Human Services: $14,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRAUE CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $4,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CHICAGO: $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBARGEMUSIC LTD: $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHome of the Sparrow Inc: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER McHENRY COUNTY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCASA OF MCHENRY COUNTY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation): $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL17.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Aptargroup Charitable Foundation · The Community Foundation for McHenry County · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare · AbbVie Foundation · The Gerhard & Patricia Weiler Family Foundation · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lecoque Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lecoque Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lecoque Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph