Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Gerhard & Patricia Weiler Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$120k
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 63% of THE GERHARD & PATRICIA WEILER FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k30 grants · $75k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF MCC FOUNDATION$35,000
WOODSTOCK FOOD PANTRY$10,000
NEIGHBORS FOOD PANTRY OF WONDER LAKE$5,000
HEBRON COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY$5,000
CRYSTAL LAKE FOOD PANTRY$5,000
CARY GROVE FOOD PANTRY$5,000
HARVARD FOOD PANTRY$5,000
MORE CENTER FOOD PANTRY$5,000
ALGONQUIN-LAKE IN THE HILLS INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY$5,000
COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY OF RICHMONDSPRING GROVE$5,000
GRAFTON FOOD PANTRY$5,000
TLS VETERANSVETERANES PATH TO HOPE$4,000
INDEPENDENCE HEALTH & THERAPY$2,000
TURNING POINT$2,000
HOME OF THE SPARROW$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $59k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 14% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GOT YOUR SIX SUPPORT DOGS: $2k → 12%GOT YOUR SIX SUPPORT DOGS: $2k → 12%GOT YOUR SIX SUPPORT DOGS: $2k → 12%GOT YOUR SIX SUPPORT DOGS: $1k → 12%GOT YOUR SIX SUPPORT DOGS: $1k → 12%PIONEER CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $2k → 6%PIONEER CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $2k → 6%PIONEER CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $2k → 6%PIONEER CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $1k → 6%PIONEER CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $1k → 6%TURNING POINT: $5k → 6%TURNING POINT: $5k → 6%TURNING POINT: $5k → 6%TURNING POINT: $2k → 6%TURNING POINT: $2k → 6%ALGONQUIN-LAKE IN THE HILLS INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 6%ALGONQUIN-LAKE IN THE HILLS INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 6%ALGONQUIN-LAKE IN THE HILLS INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 6%ALGONQUIN-LAKE IN THE HILLS INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 6%ALGONQUIN-LAKE IN THE HILLS INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY: $4k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$579k · 39 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

39 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
4

Total granted

$579k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+33%

Still filing today

51%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHealthArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WF
    Woodstock Food Pantry
    5× · 2021–2025 · $29k · revenue +690%
  • GT
    Grafton Township Food Pantry
    5× · 2021–2025 · $24k · revenue +5%
  • AI
    ALGONQUIN-LAKE IN THE HILLS INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $24k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
  • PO
    PUBLIC ORGANIZATION ANIMAL SHELTER SIRIUS
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    one grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue -40%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hinsdale Humane Society

To prevent animal suffering and neglect throughout our community and beyond, and to ensure that all animals in shelters and homes are well cared for and treated with compassion.

Animals
2
Humane Animal Partners

Founded in 2023, humane animal partners is a nonprofit no-kill animal care and adoption center. we are committed to providing for the needs of homeless and owned dogs and cats in our community. we make "friends for life" by connecting…

Animals
3
Champaign County Humane Association

The champaign county humane association owns and operates the paws animal shelter. the mission is to provide food and shelter to abandoned and strayed animals.

Animals
4
Warwick Valley Humane Society Inc

Operation of Animal Shelter

Animals
5
Felines Inc

Providing a safe and loving shelter to cats and dogs until their permanent adoptive home is found.

Animals
6
Humane Society of Monroe County Il

The organization rescues animals and cares for them until they can find them qualified homes.

Animals
7
Macoupin County Adopt a Pet

Rescue, care, and adoption services for pets

Animals
8
Macomb County Humane Society

Provide care for homeless/abused animals

Animals
9
Pet Network Humane Society

Pet Network rescues adoptable animals from euthanasia, connects abandoned animals with loving families, instills respect for animals through humane education, and enhances lives through animal companionship.

Animals
10
Animal Health Organization

To fill the needs of countless animals and their families by providing access to veterinary medical care, food, shelter, supplies, and other resources to keep animals happy, healthy, and out of shelters.

Animals
11
Upper Valley Humane Society Inc

UVHS improves quality of life for people and pets through an innovative animal shelter and adoption center and through services that reduce suffering, support wellness, and foster compassion.

Animals
12
Hands N Paws Animal Assistance

The prevention of cruelty to animals and promotion of animal welfare through rescue, rehabilitation, and rehoming of abandoned or abused pets.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Algonquin-Lake in the Hills Interfaith Food Pantry Inc and the most unlike its peers is Salt River Wild Horse Management Group Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Community Servi…Animal Rescue and ShelterPerforming Arts Organizatio…Youth and Family Support Se…Homeless Services & HousingProfessional Associations a…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%14%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%27%10–20yr17%23%20–35yr14%32%35–55yr16%5%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%10%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%19%10–20yr17%33%20–35yr14%34%35–55yr16%3%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 14% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
16%
5,376/34,516

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FRIENDS OF MCC FOUNDATION — $126,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF MCC FOUNDATIONWoodstock Food Pantry — $29,000 · OtherWoodstock Food PantryMORE CENTER FOOD PANTRY — $24,000 · OtherMORE CENTER FOOD PANTRYHARVARD FOOD PANTRY — $24,000 · OtherHARVARD FOOD PANTRYCARY GROVE FOOD PANTRY — $24,000 · OtherCARY GROVE FOOD PANTRYIndependence Health & Therapy — $16,000 · OtherWONDER LAKE FOOD PANTRY — $15,000 · OtherRICHMONDSPRING GROVE COMMUNITY PANTRY — $15,000 · Other+20 more — $127,000 · Other+20 moreGrafton Township Food Pantry — $24,000 · Food & NutritionGrafton Towns…CRYSTAL LAKE FOOD PANTRY INC — $24,000 · Food & NutritionCRYSTAL LAKE …Hebron Community Food Pantry — $24,000 · Food & NutritionHebron Commun…ALGONQUIN-LAKE IN THE HILLS INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC — $24,000 · Human ServicesALGONQUIN-L…Turning Point Inc — $19,000 · Human ServicesTurning Poi…GOT YOUR SIX SUPPORT DOGS — $8,000 · Human ServicesGOT YOUR SI…Pioneer Center for Human Services — $8,000 · Human ServicesPioneer Cen…RAUE CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $22,000 · Arts & CultureASSISI ANIMAL FOUNDATION — $4,500 · AnimalsFOX VALLEY HELPING PAWS ANIMAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION INC — $4,000 · AnimalsON ANGELS WINGS INC — $4,000 · AnimalsHOOVED ANIMAL HUMANE SOCIETY — $4,000 · AnimalsHOOF WOOF & MEOW ANIMAL RESCUE — $3,000 · AnimalsSalt River Wild Horse Management Group Inc — $1,000 · AnimalsPROJECT HOPE ANIMAL RESCUE FOUNDATION — $1,000 · AnimalsHome of the Sparrow Inc — $18,000 · Housing & ShelterCASA OF MCHENRY COUNTY INC — $8,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$400,500Food & Nutrition$72,000Human Services$59,000Arts & Culture$22,000Animals$21,500Housing & Shelter$18,000Crime & Legal$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWoodstock Food Pantry — $29,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetGrafton Township Food Pantry — $24,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetALGONQUIN-LAKE IN THE HILLS INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC — $24,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetCRYSTAL LAKE FOOD PANTRY INC — $24,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHebron Community Food Pantry — $24,000 over 5y, 34% of budgetCARY GROVE FOOD PANTRY — $24,000 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetRAUE CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $22,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetTurning Point Inc — $19,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHome of the Sparrow Inc — $18,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetIndependence Health & Therapy — $16,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetGOT YOUR SIX SUPPORT DOGS — $8,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCASA OF MCHENRY COUNTY INC — $8,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetPioneer Center for Human Services — $8,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPets for Vets Inc — $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetASSISI ANIMAL FOUNDATION — $4,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetFOX VALLEY HELPING PAWS ANIMAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION INC — $4,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetON ANGELS WINGS INC — $4,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHOOVED ANIMAL HUMANE SOCIETY — $4,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetChildrens Oncology Services Inc — $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOOF WOOF & MEOW ANIMAL RESCUE — $3,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetSalt River Wild Horse Management Group Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Woodstock Food Pantry
  • Who funds Grafton Township Food Pantry
  • Who funds ALGONQUIN-LAKE IN THE HILLS INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC
  • Who funds CRYSTAL LAKE FOOD PANTRY INC
  • Who funds Hebron Community Food Pantry
  • Who funds CARY GROVE FOOD PANTRY
  • Who funds RAUE CENTER FOR THE ARTS
  • Who funds Turning Point Inc
  • Who funds Home of the Sparrow Inc
  • Who funds Independence Health & Therapy
  • Who funds GOT YOUR SIX SUPPORT DOGS
  • Who funds CASA OF MCHENRY COUNTY INC
  • Who funds Pioneer Center for Human Services
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds Pets for Vets Inc
  • Who funds ASSISI ANIMAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FOX VALLEY HELPING PAWS ANIMAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds ON ANGELS WINGS INC
  • Who funds HOOVED ANIMAL HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds Childrens Oncology Services Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for McHenry CountyIL24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for McHenry County · Aptargroup Charitable Foundation · Northern Illinois Food Bank · AbbVie Foundation · Full Circle Foundation · Foglia Family Foundation · Motorola Solutions Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · The Bersted Foundation · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group · Baxter International Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Gerhard & Patricia Weiler Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Gerhard & Patricia Weiler Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Gerhard & Patricia Weiler Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph