· Public charity
Leadership Foundations
Developing, strengthening & sustaining local LEADERSHIP FOUNDATIONS for the social and spiritual renewal of their cities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 19 grants below total $568,418 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $703,210 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $134,792 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $32k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $363k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $174k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MEMPHIS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION | $99,971 |
| ROOT CELLAR | $73,635 |
| ON RAMPS COVENANT CHURCH | $45,800 |
| BILLINGS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION | $42,970 |
| MIAMI VALLEY LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION | $39,789 |
| METRO ATLANTA LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION | $37,880 |
| KNOXVILLE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION | $33,190 |
| COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CAPE FEAR | $31,939 |
| DALLAS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION | $29,243 |
| PHILADELPHIA LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION | $24,047 |
| TRANSFORM SCOTT COUNTY | $23,718 |
| NEW VISION | $16,965 |
| LEXINGTON LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION | $13,410 |
| JUSTICE JOURNEY ALLIANCE | $13,350 |
| 20 20 VISION FOR SCHOOLS INC DBA THRIVE COLLECTIVE | $10,420 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $174k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 70% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $76k on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: TO PROVIDE OPERATING COSTS FOR THE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION.
Stated purpose: TO PROVIDE OPERATING COSTS FOR THE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION.
Stated purpose: TO PROVIDE OPERATING COSTS FOR THE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
38 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MAMETRO ATLANTA LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INCORPORATED8× · 2017–2024 · $395k · revenue +89% · 37% of their budget
- KLKNOXVILLE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $391k · revenue +199%
- TRTHE ROOT CELLAR8× · 2017–2024 · $368k · revenue +68%
Funded once
- NLNORTHWEST LEADERSHIP FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $34k
- HHHarbor Hope Centergraduatedone grant, 2020 · $23k · revenue +169%
- LOLION OF JUDAH MINISTRIES INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $22k · revenue +121%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of Urban Leaders Fellowship is to transform communities through people, partnership, and policy. ULF pursues this mission through our flagship program, a leadership development Fellowship focused on practical experience in…
Organization provides educational opportunities, training experiences, and support for church congregations. small neighborhood groups, and individuals in urban areas, who are brought together to address the complex social issues affecting…
TLCs vision is to promote the development individuals as community leaders. This is achieved through comprehensive instruction, professional training, and career development programs designed to improve their skills and capabilities.
New City Networks exists to bring whole life transformation to under-resourced youth in the US and globally. In the US we operate two full leadership development programs that employ over 60 youth 200 days a year.
Orthodox Christian Coaching supports adaptive leadership practice through professional coaching for: Seminary graduates who are embarking on new ministries, priests and ministry leaders who have accepted new parish assignments, lay and…
Our mission is to multiply the global impact and influence of Christian leaders and pastors throughout their organizations and communities. Our activities involve working with members of the leadership of other exclusively charitable…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Memphis Leadership Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Champions in Service San Fernando Valley and Greater Los Angeles. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MEMPHIS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds METRO ATLANTA LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds KNOXVILLE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE ROOT CELLAR ↗
- Who funds DALLAS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LEXINGTON LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Miami Valley Leadership Foundation ↗
- Who funds BILLINGS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Foundation for Renewable Energy and the Environment ↗
- Who funds FRIENDSHIP HOUSE OF CHRISTIAN SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds FRESNO PACIFIC UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds RESTORE ↗
- Who funds INDIAN MINISTRIES OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds LANE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JACKSON LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CONTINGENT ↗
- Who funds URBAN VENTURES LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PITTSBURGH LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR LEADERSHIP CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds ONE BY ONE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LEADERSHIP FOUNDATIONS ↗
- Who funds JUSTICE JOURNEY EXPERIENCE ↗
- Who funds NEXT CHAPTER MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Transform Scott County Inc ↗
- Who funds BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIALEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JUSTICE FOR ALL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds 20 20 Vision For Schools Inc ↗
- Who funds Harbor Hope Center ↗
- Who funds NEW VISION RENEWABLE ENERGY INC ↗
- Who funds LION OF JUDAH MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds CHAMPIONS IN SERVICE SAN FERNANDO VALLEY AND GREATER LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds KINGDOM PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds LOUISVILLE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds VISION URBANA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Leadership Foundations funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Contingent — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.