Skip to content
Leaders Legacy Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

Leaders Legacy Inc

TO DEVELOP WHOLENESS OF MIND, BODY, SPIRIT AND RELATIONSHIPS WITH EXECUTIVE LEADERS AND EMERGING LEADERS, THROUGH VALUE-ADDED, INTENSIVE RELATIONSHIPS.

$61k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$211kRecreation & Sports$186kReligion$170kEducation$50kPhilanthropy$30kInternational$20kHousing & Shelter$12kHealth$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
$9,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Fellowship of Christian Athletes$31,892
L2L INC$10,850
Individual grant recipient$9,000
Whitefield Academy$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,504
Individual grant recipient$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $201k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ATLANTA MISSION: $60k → 13%ATLANTA MISSION: $38k → 13%ATLANTA MISSION: $35k → 13%ATLANTA MISSION: $35k → 13%ATLANTA MISSION: $33k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$522k · 7 repeat orgs$304k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
12

Total granted

$522k
$280k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+27%

Still filing today

71%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEmploymentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CITY OF REFUGE
    3× · 2020–2022 · $95k · revenue +151%
  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
    2× · 2024–2025 · $69k · revenue +1%
  • GT
    GEORGIA TECH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $67k · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $75k
  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRIST GEORGIA
    one grant, 2023 · $75k
  • GT
    GEORGIA TECH ATHLETIC SCHOLARSHIP
    one grant, 2024 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
2
Alliance for Transformational Ministry

Enable christian organizations worldwide to initiate and strenghten ministries that lead people to become followers of jesus and transform communities out of cycles of poverty and disease.

Religion
3
Blue Letter Bible

The specific purpose of this corporation is to present a biblical, christian ministry of the gospel, hope, encouragement and strength to as many people as possible. the intent of those who will conduct this corporation's work is to present…

—
4
Ascension Health Global Mission

Rooted in the loving ministry of Jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. Our Catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually centered, holistic care,…

—
5
Christian Leadership Alliance

Christian leadership alliance exists to equip and unite leaders called to transform the world for christ.

—
6
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
7
World Orphans

World orphans vision is to empower the church to care for orphans and vulnerable families. we equip, inspire, and mobilize the church to care for orphans and vulnerable children. churches engaged. children restored. communities transformed…

—
8
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

—
9
World Christian Broadcasting Corporation

World christian broadcasting exists so that people in places best served by broadcast media become aware of the good news of jesus christ and want to know more. geographic areas that cannot be easily served by missionaries are a priority.

Arts & Culture
10
Corus International Inc

TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…

Human Services
11
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
12
Time of Grace Ministry

Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Union Mission Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Childspring International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $75,015 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFELLOWSHIP OF CHRIST GEORGIA: $75,000 · OtherFELLOWSHIP OF CHRIST GEORGIAFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $50,000 · OtherFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETESGEORGIA TECH ATHLETIC SCHOLARSHIP: $40,000 · OtherGEORGIA TECH ATHLETIC SCHOLARSHIPWHITEFIELD FUND: $30,000 · OtherWHITEFIELD FUNDAT FUND: $25,000 · OtherAT FUND+9 more: $64,064 · Other+9 moreATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION: $200,730 · Human ServicesATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPO…CITY OF REFUGE: $95,000 · ReligionCITY OF REFUGESAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PU…GEORGIA TECH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC: $67,050 · EducationGEORGIA TE…WHITEFIELD ACADEMY ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · EducationWHITEFIELD…FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $69,322 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHI…ATLANTA CENTER FOR SELF SUFFICIENCY INC: $10,000 · EmploymentLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC: $5,100 · International
Other$359,079Human Services$200,730Religion$105,000Education$77,050Youth Development$69,322Employment$10,000International$5,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION: $200,730 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCITY OF REFUGE: $95,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $69,322 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA TECH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC: $67,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWHITEFIELD ACADEMY ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDSPRING INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,210 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC: $5,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CITY OF REFUGE ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA TECH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WHITEFIELD ACADEMY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA CENTER FOR SELF SUFFICIENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDSPRING INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charit…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA11.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leaders Legacy Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leaders Legacy Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Leaders Legacy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home