LAWRENCE N GREENLEAF MASONIC BUILDING ASSOCIATION

· Public charity

LAWRENCE N GREENLEAF MASONIC BUILDING ASSOCIATION

Q: How much did LAWRENCE N GREENLEAF MASONIC BUILDING ASSOCIATION grant in FY2022?

LAWRENCE N GREENLEAF MASONIC BUILDING ASSOCIATION reported 3 grants totaling $16,000 in its FY2022 IRS filing.

Q: Where is LAWRENCE N GREENLEAF MASONIC BUILDING ASSOCIATION based?

LAWRENCE N GREENLEAF MASONIC BUILDING ASSOCIATION is based in CO.

The organization is a fraternal organization, which in provides support to lawrence greenleaf lodge no 169 and in addition awards scholarship to worthy high school graduating senior, donates to 501 (c)3 charities, help support for sick children and hearing impaird children.

$16k

Granted FY2022

Grants

Communities

$10k

Largest

01What you fund

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 52% of LAWRENCE N GREENLEAF MASONIC BUILDING ASSOCIATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

abuseddenver

2020

foresight

2022

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2022 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

Under $10k2 grants · $6k
$10k–50k1 grant · $10k

$3,000

Median grant

States reached

$2.2M

Total assets

Largest grants

OURAY TEMPLE ASSOCIATION$10,000
CENTRAL CITY LODGE NO 6$3,000
DENVER FITZSIMMONS CHAP37 SOJOURNER$3,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 7%. 50% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen.

Philanthropy

Colorado Fiscal Institute

To provide timely, credible and accessible analyses of fiscal and economic issues facing colorado to inform public policy debates and promote economic prosperity

Community Improvement

Aia Colorado

AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…

—

Colorado State University Foundation

Colorado state university foundation receives, manages and invests gifts in support of csu.

Education

Colorado Healing Fund

A secure way for the public to contribute to victims of mass tragedy in Colorado

Public Safety & Disaster

The Colorado Health Foundation

Health

Colorado Wildlife Federation Inc

Educate and advocate for wildlife management regulations and policy decisions, educate students and families about colorado's ecosystems and wildlife species in programs.

Animals

The Colorado State Fair Foundation

To enhance youth programming, education and experiences at the colorado state fair.

Arts & Culture

Colorado Enterprise Fund

To accelerate community prosperity by financing and supporting entrepreneurs and small businesses.

Community Improvement

Colorado Council On Economic

Empowering colorado students to achieve a lifetime of ecconomic understanding and financial freedom.

—

The Colorado Trust

Philanthropy

Caring for Colorado Foundation

To create equity in health, well-being and opportunity for colorado's children and families.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Women's Employment & Education and the most unlike its peers is Fallen Officer Fund of Douglas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 10% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

10%

3/31

the rest of the field

11%

3,025/27,117

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

20/20

Grantees still filing

17/20

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$150,860Education$31,000Arts & Culture$30,500Health$25,500Human Services$19,000Recreation & Sports$6,500Employment$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO22.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · The Janus Henderson Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation LAWRENCE N GREENLEAF MASONIC BUILDING ASSOCIATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Y ON EARTH.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 3 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 832308563 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Y ON EARTH, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 11% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Lawrence N Greenleaf Masonic Building Association?

Find your warmest path to Lawrence N Greenleaf Masonic Building Association through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

LAWRENCE N GREENLEAF MASONIC BUILDING ASSOCIATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Lawrence N Greenleaf Masonic Building Association?

More from the funding graph

LAWRENCE N GREENLEAF MASONIC BUILDING ASSOCIATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Lawrence N Greenleaf Masonic Building Association?

More from the funding graph