Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lavin Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

International$480kEducation$110kHealth$71kPhilanthropy$65kCivil Rights$35kReligion$27kHuman Services$14kScience & Tech$13kOther$0
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$8,610
Median grant
1
States reached
$9k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
National Multiple Sclerosis Foundat$8,610
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Invest for Kids: $1k → 14%Council for Jewish Elderly: $5k → 14%Council for Jewish Elderly: $5k → 14%Council for Jewish Elderly: $1k → 14%Shalva: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OR
OH
CT
CA
AZ
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$602k · 16 repeat orgs$136k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2023, 15 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
27

Total granted

$602k
$136k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+39%

Still filing today

38%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23
InternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentReligionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    4× · 2017–2020 · $65k · revenue +13%
  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    4× · 2017–2020 · $46k · revenue +53%
  • SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $25k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • TA
    Tel Aviv University
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • CF
    Cystric Fibrosis Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ELNETgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $12k · revenue +60%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Judaism Foundation
—
2
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
3
Sherit Isroel
—
4
Connect Israel

Connect israel is a life-long program that aims to strengthen the gap between american jews and israelis through business, creative teamwork, and developing personal relationships.

International
5
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
6
Friends of Institute for Zionist

The organization seeks to reinforce the foundations of israel as a jewish and democratic state. it acts to promote programs to educate the israeli public on the importance of both values and to demonstrate how each contributes to and…

International
7
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
8
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
9
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
10
Better Future for Israel

To strengthen israel's future in these areas: 1)providing new immigrants with assistance in a few key areas: representing them as they navigate government ministries and assisting them with their challenges as new immigrants to israel.…

Philanthropy
11
The Jerusalem Connection
—
12
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Israel Education Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Invest for Kids Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $290,000 · InternationalAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $122,200 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INCFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $46,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES+5 more: $21,500 · InternationalAmerican Friends of Tel Aviv Univer: $50,500 · OtherAmerican Friends of Tel Aviv UniverTel Aviv University: $50,000 · OtherTel Aviv UniversityNational Multiple Sclerosis Foundat: $36,610 · OtherNational Multiple Sclerosis FoundatCystric Fibrosis Foundation: $15,000 · OtherCystric Fibrosis FoundationElnet: $12,500 · OtherWeizman Institute: $11,000 · OtherNORTH SUBURBAN SYNAGOGUE BETH EL: $10,500 · OtherBUILD INC: $10,000 · OtherCystic Fibrosis Foundation: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherStand with Us: $9,350 · Other+18 more: $45,450 · Other+18 moreJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $65,000 · PhilanthropySIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $11,000 · Human ServicesInvest for Kids Inc: $1,200 · Human ServicesSHALVA INC: $500 · Human ServicesBRIGHT STAR COMMUNITY OUTREACH CORP: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentWOLCOTT SCHOOL: $2,000 · Education
International$479,700Other$270,910Philanthropy$65,000Arts & Culture$25,000Human Services$12,700Youth Development$5,000Education$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $290,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $122,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $65,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $46,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF ELNET: $12,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBUILD INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF REICHMAN UNIVERSITY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOLCOTT SCHOOL: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANTOR'S ASSEMBLY: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHALVA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ELNET ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY ↗
  • Who funds BUILD INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHT STAR COMMUNITY OUTREACH CORP ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF REICHMAN UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds WOLCOTT SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Invest for Kids Inc ↗
  • Who funds HAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA ↗
  • Who funds COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan ChicagoIL19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · The Chicago Community Trust · Circle of Service Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Charities Aid Foundation America · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lavin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lavin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lavin Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Lavin Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lavin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph