Skip to content
Laurence Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Laurence Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$61k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Animals$29kHealth$20kFood & Nutrition$13kPhilanthropy$5kHousing & Shelter$3kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$875k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CROHNS & COLITIS FOUNDATION$6,000
NICHOLAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$3,750
NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE$3,500
HUMANE SOCIETY OF UNITED STATES$3,500
HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL$3,500
FEEDING AMERICA$3,250
GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER$3,250
SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST$3,250
CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP$3,250
FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA$3,000
COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF NEW JERSEY$3,000
JON BON JOVI SOUL FOUNDATION$3,000
BEYOND NINE CAT RESCUE INC$2,500
SAFE HAVEN EQUINE WARRIORS$2,500
THE ASHER HOUSE$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP: $3k → 15%DE MOYA FOUNDATION: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OR
PA
NJ
CA
MD
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

21%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$15k · 3 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

$15k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+48%

Still filing today

67%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’24
AnimalsFood & NutritionHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2019–2024 · $7k · revenue +15%
  • NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC
    2× · 2019–2024 · $5k · revenue +1%
  • SW
    SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST
    2× · 2019–2024 · $4k

Funded once

  • NC
    NIKLAUS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2019 · $8k
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • MA
    MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
2
Global Canine and Feline Rescue Association Inc

We rescue cats and dogs suffered on the street and in endangered locations in both new york and china. the mission of our no-kill shelter is to provide stray cats with safe haven and veterinary care before placing them in forever loving…

Animals
3
Hope for China Dogs Rescue

At Hope for China Dogs, we are committed to combating the cruel and inhumane practice of the dog meat trade in China. We believe that every dog deserves to live a life free from pain and suffering, and we are dedicated to rescuing and…

Animals
4
Humane World for Animals Inc

Humane World for Animals, Inc., formerly known as the Humane Society of the United States (The Organization), seeks to tackle the root causes of animal cruelty and suffering. CONTINUED ON SCHEDULE O

Animals
5
Feeding Homeless Felines Foundation
Animals
6
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
7
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc

Protection of animal rights

Animals
8
No Dogs Left Behind
Animals
9
The Animal Welfare Foundation
—
10
Florida Pointer Rescue Inc

Rescue pointer dogs and treat back to health and f

Animals
11
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
12
Happy Doggo

The organization will address the global street dog problem through sterilization, vaccination, critical medical care, and re-homing of sick, injured, and abused dogs.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is God's Love We Deliver Inc; the most unlike its peers is De Moya Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
7/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NIKLAUS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $7,500 · OtherNIKLAUS CHILDRENS HOSPITALSHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST: $4,000 · OtherSHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUSTNICHOLAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $3,750 · OtherNICHOLAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATI…HUMANE SOCIETY OF UNITED STATES: $3,500 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF UNITED STATESB THE DIFFERENCE: $2,000 · OtherB THE DIFFERENCEJAFCO: $1,500 · OtherJAFCOHUMANE SOCIETY: $1,250 · Other+2 more: $750 · OtherNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC: $4,500 · AnimalsNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AM…Humane World for Animals International: $3,500 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals Int…Safe Haven Equine Warriors Inc: $2,500 · AnimalsSafe Haven Equine Warriors I…THE ASHER HOUSE: $2,500 · AnimalsTHE ASHER HOUSEBEYOND NINE CAT RESCUE INC: $2,500 · AnimalsBEYOND NINE CAT RESCUE INCWOODLANDS WILDLIFE REFUGE INC: $1,500 · AnimalsWOODLANDS WILDLIFE REFUGE IN…THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,250 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE…+1 more: $250 · AnimalsFeeding America: $3,250 · Food & NutritionFeeding AmericaGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $3,250 · Food & NutritionGOD'S LOVE WE DELIV…Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc: $3,000 · Food & NutritionCommunity Food Bank…FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $3,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING SOUTH FLORI…CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $6,750 · HealthCROHN'S & CO…THE V FOUNDATION: $1,500 · HealthTHE V FOUNDA…CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC: $3,250 · Human ServicesDE MOYA FOUNDATION: $1,500 · Human ServicesJON BON JOVI SOUL FOUNDATION: $3,000 · PhilanthropySoi Dog Foundation USA: $1,500 · Philanthropy
Other$24,250Animals$18,500Food & Nutrition$12,500Health$8,250Human Services$4,750Philanthropy$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $6,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals International: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $3,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $3,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC: $3,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJON BON JOVI SOUL FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSafe Haven Equine Warriors Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHE ASHER HOUSE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEYOND NINE CAT RESCUE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSoi Dog Foundation USA: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDE MOYA FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWOODLANDS WILDLIFE REFUGE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNO DOGS LEFT BEHIND INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Verizon FoundationPaypal Charitable Giv…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Verizon FoundationNJ11.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Verizon Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Laurence Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Laurence Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Feeding South Florida Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Chapman Partnership Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Laurence Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home