Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Laurel Foundation

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.7M
Granted FY2018
2
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$4.7M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172018.

Philanthropy$4.7MHuman Services$121kHousing & Shelter$50kEducation$28kFood & Nutrition$23kHealth$500
02FY2018 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $77k
  • $250k+1 grant · $4.7M
$4,658,703
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JPMORGAN CHARITABLE GIVING FUND PROGRAM$4,658,703
JPMORGAN CHARITABLE GIVING FUND PROGRAM$76,846
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $176k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $25k → 10%LAZARUS HOUSE: $30k → 8%MUTUAL GROUND: $121k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Habitat for Humanity of Lapeer - Tuscola

To eliminate sub-standard housing and homelessness from lapeer county.

2
Samaritan House Inc

Provide shelter and basic needs for homeless people. while fostering self-respect and human dignity, samaritan house will encourage the residents' efforts to find employment and housing.

Housing & Shelter
3
Lazarus House Inc

Opening doors out of poverty by providing shelter, food, clothing and education, and support for the homeless and the poor, in the lawrence, massachusetts area.

Housing & Shelter
4
Habitat for Humanity of Baldwin County Inc

Habitat for humanity of baldwin county, inc. is an ecumenical, christian housing ministry that seeks to eliminate poverty housing by partnering with the community to make decent shelter a matter of conscience and action.

5
Habitat for Humanity of Effingham County Inc

Habitat is a christian housing ministry that works with people in need to improve the conditions in which they live by providing affordable housing.

6
Lazarus House Ministries Inc

Lazarus house is an emergency food pantry serving those people who have food insecurity in the greater wildwood, nj area. we provide food, some toiletries and personal items to many families and individuals during the year.

Human Services
7
Bartlett House Inc

The organization's mission is to house, provide supportive services and an avenue to help break the cycle of homelessness. the organization is committed to providing an environment that meets a person's basic needs in an atmosphere where…

8
Habitat for Humanity of La Plata County Inc

To build decent, affordable homes in partnership with families in need.

9
Maumee Valley Habitat for Humanity

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. maumee valley habitat for humanity adheres…

10
Bath Area Food Bank

The bath area food bank's mission is to feed food insecure families and individuals with dignity and respect by supplying home cooked meals and a grocery store type atmosphere where client's chose the items they require. it's service area…

Food & Nutrition
11
St Vincents House

Service agency providing comprehensive social services and community outreach programs for the entire family. st. vincent's house serves the disadvantaged, underserved and working poor population of the greater galveston community with…

Human Services
12
Lake County Habitat for Humanity

To eliminate poverty housing and homelessness by working in partnership with people in need. Using donated funds and materials, Habitat volunteers build or rehabilitate homes and sell them at cost to hardworking, low-income families with…

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Matthews House Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Lung Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JPMORGAN CHARITABLE GIVING FUND PROGRAM — $4,735,549 · OtherJPMORGAN CHARITABLE GIVING FUND PROGRAMMUTUAL GROUND INC — $121,139 · Human ServicesLAZARUS HOUSE — $30,000 · Human ServicesGRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesBATAVIA INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY — $22,500 · Food & NutritionST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC — $15,000 · Housing & ShelterHabitat for Humanity of Collier County Inc — $5,000 · Housing & ShelterBATAVIA FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE — $3,000 · EducationAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION — $500 · Health
Other$4,735,549Human Services$176,139Food & Nutrition$22,500Housing & Shelter$20,000Education$3,000Health$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMUTUAL GROUND INC — $121,139 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetLAZARUS HOUSE — $30,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetGRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBATAVIA INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY — $22,500 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Collier County Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBATAVIA FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE — $3,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Laurel Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • St Matthews House Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph