· Private foundation
Latah County Community Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Genesee School District | $6,495 |
| Troy Volunteer Fire Ambulance | $3,000 |
| University of Idaho Latah County Ex | $3,000 |
| CHAS Health Foundation | $3,000 |
| Moscow Contemporary | $2,700 |
| Family Promise of the Palouse Inc | $2,700 |
| Moscow School District 281 | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,500 |
| Special Olympics | $1,000 |
| Deary Food Bank | $700 |
| Troy Food Bank | $700 |
| Potlatch Food Bank | $700 |
| First Presbyterian Church | $690 |
| Moscow Food Bank | $615 |
| Inland Oasis | $615 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.
49 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 36 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- FPFAMILY PROMISE OF THE PALOUSE INC6× · 2019–2025 · $17k · revenue +754%
- PLPALOUSE LAND TRUST INC4× · 2019–2024 · $8k · revenue +197%
- MDMOSCOW DAY SCHOOL INC2× · 2021–2022 · $5k · revenue +51%
Funded once
- KEKendrick-Juliaetta Ed Foundationone grant, 2017 · $3k
- WSWhitepine School Districtone grant, 2024 · $3k
- PSPotlatch School Music Departmentone grant, 2019 · $3k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To embrace, equip, and empower immigrants through access to culturally informed essential services, and facilitate covnnections to grow deeper roots and thrive in Spokane.
Provide services to people before, throughout, and after an unplanned pregnancy.
To help families with children in our community who are situationally homeless achieve sustainable independence through a community based response by providing temporary housing, usually 60-90 days, along with case management.
Idaho Animal Rescue Network is a 501(c)(3) non-profit based in Idaho that works in Idaho and Eastern Washington to educate, advocate, and network with other rescues and law enforcement in Idaho regarding animal cruelty and neglect. We are…
To provide mental health and chemical dependency prevention and treatment programs in Whitman County, Washington.
To provide suitable and affordable lodging for chapter members of farmhouse fraternity at the university of idaho in moscow, idaho
Using public media storytelling to educate the public by making cross-cultural connections in partnership with the tribes of the Columbia Plateau region.
How this is measured
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 105 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF THE PALOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds PALOUSE LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds MOSCOW CONTEMPORARY INC ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PALOUSE ↗
- Who funds MOSCOW DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds MOSCOW CHARTER SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds LATAH COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds INLAND OASIS INC ↗
- Who funds HEART OF THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds SOJOURNERS' ALLIANCE INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Avista Foundation · Lewis-Clark Valley Healthcare Foundation · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · Innovia Foundation · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Schreck Family Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Latah County Community Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Latah County Community Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Latah County’s filings →