Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lash Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$152k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$109k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$311kEducation$250kReligion$141kPhilanthropy$47kArts & Culture$28kHealth$26kAnimals$25kPublic Benefit$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $38k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $109k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION$108,875
CONGREGATION BETH EL$15,130
PADRES FOUNDATION$13,000
FOUNDATION FOR ANIMAL CARE AND EDUCATION$10,000
OSTEOPATHIC PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF CALIFORNIA$2,500
THE OLD GLOBE$1,500
CENTER FOR HEARING AND COMMUNICATION$896
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $711) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $461 → 14%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $250 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$789k · 16 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
23

Total granted

$789k
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+35%

Still filing today

69%
74%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationArts & CultureAnimalsPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • US
    UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION
    6× · 2018–2024 · $217k · revenue +28%
  • UB
    US-Mexico Border Philanthropy Partnership
    2× · 2022–2023 · $34k · revenue +408%
  • PC
    PHILADELPHIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE
    3× · 2019–2022 · $31k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • HO
    HILLEL OF SAN DIEGO
    one grant, 2023 · $31k · revenue -10%
  • SF
    SEAL-NSW FAMILY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue +3%
  • SD
    SAN DIEGO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -80%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
3
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
8
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
11
Usc Care Medical Group Inc

To promote health by engaging in the practice of medicine for patients of hospitals affiliated with the university of southern california keck school of medicine and elsewhere. to provide medical care to the sick and injured who may come…

Health
12
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Uc San Diego Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Uta Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPublic University Foundatio…Legal Aid & Immigration Ser…Jewish Community FederationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionYouth Sports Booster Organi…Community Arts OrganizationsFood Pantries & AssistanceCommunity Health CentersPublic Library SupportFaith-Based Senior LivingVeteran Support ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%3%<5yr15%3%5–10yr20%17%10–20yr17%37%20–35yr11%13%35–55yr13%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%21%<5yr15%3%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr17%52%20–35yr11%1%35–55yr13%11%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 21% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,946

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
22/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAN DIEGO ARMED SERVICES YMCA — $308,499 · OtherSAN DIEGO ARMED SERVICES YMCACONGREGATION BETH EL — $105,010 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH ELHILLEL OF SAN DIEGO — $30,595 · OtherHILLEL OF SAN DIEGO+21 more — $49,257 · Other+21 moreUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $217,497 · EducationUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATIONPHILADELPHIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE — $31,000 · EducationPHILADELPHIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHI…+1 more — $2,000 · EducationUS-Mexico Border Philanthropy Partnership — $33,889 · International+1 more — $1,000 · InternationalFOUNDATION FOR ANIMAL CARE & EDUCATION — $23,200 · Science & TechTHEATER & ARTS FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY DBA LA JOLLA PLAYHOUSE — $14,800 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $200 · Arts & CulturePADRES FOUNDATION — $13,100 · Philanthropy+1 more — $300 · PhilanthropyRIVER GARDEN HEBREW HOME FOR THE AGED INC — $2,300 · HealthPROJECT ANGEL FOOD — $544 · HealthLUCKY DUCK FOUNDATION — $500 · HealthNYU LANGONE HOSPITALS — $500 · HealthSCRIPPS HEALTH — $300 · Health
Other$493,361Education$250,497International$34,889Science & Tech$23,200Arts & Culture$15,000Philanthropy$13,400Health$4,144

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $217,497 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUS-Mexico Border Philanthropy Partnership — $33,889 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetPHILADELPHIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE — $31,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL OF SAN DIEGO — $30,595 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR ANIMAL CARE & EDUCATION — $23,200 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHEATER & ARTS FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY DBA LA JOLLA PLAYHOUSE — $14,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR HEARING AND COMMUNICATION — $14,096 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPADRES FOUNDATION — $13,100 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSEAL-NSW FAMILY FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOSTEOPATHIC PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS OF CA — $2,950 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRIVER GARDEN HEBREW HOME FOR THE AGED INC — $2,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF SLEEP MEDICINE — $1,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SAN DIEGO INC — $1,650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANDA PAWS RESCUE — $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL FOOD — $544 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUCKY DUCK FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican College of Chest Physicians — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNYU LANGONE HOSPITALS — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC FOUNDATION — $475 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $461 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUTA FOUNDATION — $300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMary's Mercy Center — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCRIPPS HEALTH — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sempra FoundationCA19.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sempra Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The San Diego Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lash Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lash Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lash Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph