Skip to content

· Private foundation

Larry P O'Reilly and Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$459k
Granted FY2025still arriving
82
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$424kHuman Services$384kAnimals$265kArts & Culture$252kHealth$230kReligion$218kFood & Nutrition$204kRecreation & Sports$159kOther$0
02FY2025 · 82 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k65 grants · $124k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $260k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$1,500
Median grant
13
States reached
$7.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST ELIZABETH ANN SETON CHURCH$75,000
SPRINGFIELD CATHOLIC SCHOOLS$25,000
DRURY UNIVERSITY SWIMMING 4 YEAR PLEDGE$25,000
OZARK LYRIC OPERA$25,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB - TEEN CENTER$25,000
SALVATION ARMY CAPITAL FUND DRIVE ATTN JEFF SMITH$25,000
THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHWEST MO - LUCKY PAWS$20,000
DRURY UNIVERSITY FBO POOL LANDSCAPING ATTN JEFF FREDRICK$15,000
HARVEST HOME (LEIGH)$15,000
SALVATION ARMY ATTN AMOS SHIELS$12,500
VICTORY MISSION VICTORY HUB CAPITAL PROJECT$12,500
DRURY UNIVERSITY FBO MEN'S AND WOMEN'S SWIM TEAM$10,000
WSS$10,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS - CALIFORNIA FIRES$10,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI - LIFEHOUSE CRISIS NURSERY GALA$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $264k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ST JOESPH CENTER FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%HARVEST HOME: $36k → 14%LEAST OF THESE INC: $2k → 8%HARVEST HOME: $15k → 14%LEAST OF THESE INC: $1k → 8%HARVEST HOME: $15k → 14%LEAST OF THESE INC: $1k → 8%THE GATHERING TREE: $10k → 15%HARVEST HOME: $14k → 14%LEAST OF THESE INC: $500 → 8%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 14%LEAST OF THESE INC: $500 → 8%HARVEST HOME: $10k → 14%LEAST OF THESE INC: $300 → 8%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 14%LEAST OF THESE INC: $250 → 8%HARVEST HOME: $10k → 14%ST JOSEPH'S CENTER: $5k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $5k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $5k → 14%COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $1k → 15%COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $1k → 15%COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $1k → 15%DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER OF THE OZARKS: $20k → 15%DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER OF THE OZARKS: $20k → 15%THE KITCHEN INC: $1k → 15%THE KITCHEN INC: $500 → 15%THE KITCHEN INC: $500 → 15%THE KITCHEN INC: $300 → 15%HARMONY HOUSE: $6k → 15%HARMONY HOUSE: $5k → 15%HARMONY HOUSE: $5k → 15%HARMONY HOUSE: $5k → 15%HARMONY HOUSE: $5k → 15%HARMONY HOUSE: $1k → 15%LOST AND FOUND GRIEF CENTER: $1k → 15%LOST AND FOUND: $1k → 15%LOST AND FOUND: $1k → 15%LOST AND FOUND GRIEF CENTER: $1k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI LIGHT THE NIGHT DONATION: $10k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SW MO: $10k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI - LIFEHOUSE CRISIS NURSERY GALA: $10k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI: $6k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI: $2k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SW MO: $1k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI: $1k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI: $1k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
NY
WY
SD
IA
OH
PA
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 112 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

112 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2025, 80 since wound down; 44 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

112
217

Total granted

$1.6M
$938k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+27%

Still filing today

49%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $239k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentHuman ServicesAnimalsArts & CultureHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI
    8× · 2017–2025 · $127k · revenue +23%
  • OF
    OZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $104k · revenue +58%
  • HH
    Harvest Home Inc
    6× · 2017–2024 · $100k · revenue +223%

Funded once

  • OF
    OZARKS FOOD HARVEST CAPTIAL CAMPAIGN
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • SR
    SPRINGFIELD REGIONAL OPERA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $26k · revenue +77%
  • CA
    COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -67%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Iowa Natural Heritage Foundation

This member-supported organization protects and restores iowa's land, water and wildlife for future generations. priorities include permanent land protection, promotion of improved land management and bringing new conservation…

Environment
3
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
4
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
5
National Wildlife Refuge Association

To conserve america's wildlife heritage for future generations through strategic programs that protect and enhance the national wildlife refuge system and the landscapes beyond its boundaries. by combining policy, landscape-scale…

Animals
6
Colorado Open Lands

Colorado open lands' mission is to preserve the significant open lands and natural heritage of colorado through private and public partnerships, innovative land conservation, and strategic leadership.

Environment
7
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
8
Montana Wildlife Federation

The montana wildlife federation is a statewide conservation organization dedicated to protecting wildlife, wildlife habitat, and public access for outdoor recreation.

Animals
9
Heartlands Conservancy

The mission of heartlands conservancy is to empower and colaborate with the people of southern illinois to advance and protect the health of our distinctive communities and nationally significant natural and cultural resources.

Environment
10
The Wildlife Society

The wildlife society's mission is to inspire, empower, and enable wildlife professionals to sustain wildlife populations and habitats through science-based management and conservation.

Animals
11
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
12
Harpeth Conservancy

To restore and protect clean water and healthy ecosystems for rivers in tennessee by employing scientific expertise and collaborative relationships to develop, promote, and support broad community stewardship and action.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Garden Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

86 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 86 of the 376 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
22
Early backer (in before they grew)
83/86
Grantees still filing
61/86
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST ELIZABETH ANN SETON SCHOOL - PLAYGROUND REFRESH: $186,445 · OtherST ELIZABETH ANN SETON SCHOOL - PLAYGROUND REFRESHWSS: $110,000 · OtherWSSST ELIZABETH ANN SETON CHURCH: $75,300 · Other+170 more: $1,654,529 · Other+170 moreHarvest Home Inc: $100,000 · Human ServicesHarvest Hom…CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI INC: $41,750 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CH…DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER OF THE OZARKS: $40,000 · Human ServicesDEVELOPMENT…FAMILY VIOLENCE CENTER: $26,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY VIOL…ST JOSEPH CENTER: $15,000 · Human ServicesST JOSEPH C…UNION RESCUE MISSION: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE GATHERING TREE: $10,000 · Human Services+5 more: $24,600 · Human Services+5 moreHUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI: $127,100 · AnimalsPUPPIES UNDER PROTECTION INC: $9,000 · Animals+1 more: $4,000 · AnimalsOZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC: $103,500 · Food & NutritionWESTSIDE FOOD BANK: $10,000 · Food & NutritionELEVATE BRANSON: $8,750 · Food & NutritionTHE ART OF ELYSIUM: $43,000 · Arts & CultureSPRINGFIELD REGIONAL OPERA INC: $26,000 · Arts & CultureSPRINGFIELD LITTLE THEATRE INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureMISSOURI SPORTS HALL OF FAME: $5,084 · Arts & CultureDynamic Strides Therapy Inc: $29,000 · HealthTHE VICTIM CENTER: $10,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $10,000 · HealthCONVOY OF HOPE: $40,900 · InternationalOPERATION SMILE INC: $5,200 · International
Other$2,026,274Human Services$267,850Animals$140,100Food & Nutrition$122,250Arts & Culture$94,084Health$49,000International$46,100

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI: $127,100 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetOZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC: $103,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHarvest Home Inc: $100,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI INC: $41,750 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCONVOY OF HOPE: $40,900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDEVELOPMENTAL CENTER OF THE OZARKS: $40,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetDynamic Strides Therapy Inc: $29,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetFAMILY VIOLENCE CENTER: $26,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSPRINGFIELD REGIONAL OPERA INC: $26,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI: $25,250 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSPRINGFIELD LITTLE THEATRE INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetOZARK GREENWAYS INC: $17,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetSIGMA NU EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $16,150 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBREAST CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS: $16,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSAFE AND SOBER INC: $15,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetST JOSEPH CENTER: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT CIRCLE: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VICTIM CENTER: $10,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI STATE PARKS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetTHE GATHERING TREE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLOAVES AND FISHES: $10,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWESTSIDE FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMDRC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELEVATE BRANSON: $8,750 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLOST & FOUND: $8,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetSpringfield Symphony Association: $8,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCRISIS NURSERY OF THE OZARKS INC: $7,400 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetLEAST OF THESE INC: $5,800 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $5,650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF THE OZARKS INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $5,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI SPORTS HALL OF FAME: $5,084 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetST JOSEPHS CENTER FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE GARDEN INC: $4,620 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SPRINGFIELD INC: $4,089 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCONSERVATION FEDERATION OF MISSOURI: $4,020 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRescue One: $4,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetADVENTURE CYCLING ASSOCIATION: $2,800 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KITCHEN INC: $2,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds OZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds Harvest Home Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE ART OF ELYSIUM ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI INC ↗
  • Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER OF THE OZARKS ↗
  • Who funds Dynamic Strides Therapy Inc ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY VIOLENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGFIELD REGIONAL OPERA INC ↗
  • Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGFIELD LITTLE THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds OZARK GREENWAYS INC ↗
  • Who funds SIGMA NU EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family FoundationMO73.8× affinity33 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Musgrave Foundation · Stanley & Elaine Ball Charitable Tr · Dr Nancy O'Reilly Family Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Ozarks Health Advocacy Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Cook Family Foundation · The Hulston Family Foundation · United Way of the Ozarks Inc · The Turner Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Larry P O'Reilly and Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Larry P O'Reilly and Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 376 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Larry P O'Reilly and Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph