Skip to content

· Private foundation

Larry K Sharpf Educational Scholarship Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$227k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$138k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$1.3MPublic Benefit$178k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $77k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $138k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TURNING POINT USA$138,000
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY$21,000
CORBAN UNIVERSITY$15,582
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON$15,000
WESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY$12,945
UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND$12,000
OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$7,000
PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TURNING POINT USA: $138k → 11%SALLIE MAE: $20k → 10%PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $20k → 8%GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $31k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND: $12k → 12%SOUTHERN OREGON UNIVERSITY: $13k → 13%WESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY: $51k → 13%CORBAN UNIVERSITY: $31k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF OREGON: $50k → 15%OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $13k → 16%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $108k → 18%CORNERSTONE LOANS: $11k → 8%TURNING POINT USA: $15k → 11%PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $20k → 8%GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $15k → 11%PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $36k → 12%WESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY: $37k → 13%CORBAN UNIVERSITY: $29k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF OREGON: $27k → 15%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $75k → 18%TURNING POINT USA: $15k → 11%PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $15k → 8%GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $15k → 11%PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $21k → 12%WESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY: $29k → 13%CORBAN UNIVERSITY: $20k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF OREGON: $15k → 15%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $74k → 18%PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $18k → 12%WESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY: $28k → 13%CORBAN UNIVERSITY: $19k → 14%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $54k → 18%WESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY: $13k → 13%CORBAN UNIVERSITY: $16k → 14%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $30k → 18%LINFIELD: $56k → 11%MULTNOMAH UNIVERSITY: $20k → 12%WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 14%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $21k → 18%LINFIELD: $53k → 11%MULTNOMAH UNIVERSITY: $20k → 12%WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY: $18k → 14%DLSS: $20k → 11%MULTNOMAH UNIVERSITY: $20k → 12%WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY: $12k → 14%LINFIELD: $15k → 11%MULTNOMAH UNIVERSITY: $20k → 12%WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY: $12k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 14 repeat orgs$71k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
4

Total granted

$1.5M
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+33%

Still filing today

43%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    TURNING POINT USA INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $178k · revenue +107%
  • GF
    GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2019–2023 · $67k · revenue +31%
  • WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2019–2022 · $62k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • SM
    SALLIE MAE
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • D
    DLSS
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
2
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
3
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
4
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
5
Los Angeles Pacific University

Los angeles pacific university exists to deliver high quality, accessible christ-centered education to learners everywhere.

Education
6
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
7
California Baptist University

A private institution of higher education, offering both undergraduate and graduate courses to students.

Education
8
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
11
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
12
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Portland; the most unlike its peers is Turning Point Usa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $362,334 · OtherOREGON STATE UNIVERSITYTURNING POINT USA INC: $177,500 · OtherTURNING POINT USA INCWESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY: $158,279 · OtherWESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITYLINFIELD: $126,881 · OtherLINFIELDUNIVERSITY OF OREGON: $104,532 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF OREGONPORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $79,544 · OtherPORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY+6 more: $111,004 · Other+6 moreCORBAN UNIVERSITY: $114,582 · EducationCORBAN UNIVERSITYMULTNOMAH UNIVERSITY: $80,000 · EducationMULTNOMAH UNIVERSITYGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $66,500 · EducationGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITYWILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY: $62,000 · EducationWILLAMETTE UNIVERSITYPACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $58,000 · EducationPACIFIC UNIVERSITY+2 more: $20,000 · Education
Other$1,120,074Education$401,082

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $177,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCORBAN UNIVERSITY: $114,582 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMULTNOMAH UNIVERSITY: $80,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $66,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY: $62,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $58,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUSHNELL UNIVERSITY FKA NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds CORBAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MULTNOMAH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PACIFIC UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND ↗
  • Who funds BUSHNELL UNIVERSITY FKA NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

West Scholarship FndWI16× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: West Scholarship Fnd · The Renaissance Foundation · Walter & Mary a Stastny Charitable · Dale Krueger Scholarship · Leo Adler Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Larry K Sharpf Educational Scholarship Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Larry K Sharpf Educational Scholarship Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Bushnell University Fka Northwest Christian University: 3% of income from government
  • Corban University: 3% of income from government
  • Pacific University: 2% of income from government
  • George Fox University: 2% of income from government
  • Willamette University: 1% of income from government
  • University of Portland: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Larry K Sharpf Educational Scholarship Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Larry K Sharpf Educational Scholarship Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Larry K Sharpf Educational Scholarship’s filings →

More from the funding graph