· Private foundation
Dale Krueger Scholarship
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k54 grants · $138k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $156k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $202k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY | $110,000 |
| PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY | $92,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF OREGON | $44,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND | $30,000 |
| MT HOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGE | $28,000 |
| PORTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE | $20,000 |
| WESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY | $12,000 |
| CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY | $12,000 |
| LINFIELD UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY | $8,000 |
| GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY | $8,000 |
| OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY | $6,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA | $6,000 |
| COLGATE UNIVERSITY | $4,000 |
| STANFORD UNIVERSITY | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
64 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2025, 36 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $64k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND6× · 2018–2025 · $126k · revenue +8%
- GFGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY6× · 2018–2025 · $74k · revenue +31%
- LULinfield University6× · 2018–2025 · $38k · revenue +2%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF PORTLANDone grant, 2023 · $44k
- GFGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITYone grant, 2023 · $22k
- WPWARNER PACIFIC UNIVERSITYone grant, 2023 · $16k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…
Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.
As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…
Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…
Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of the Pacific and the most unlike its peers is Southern Illinois University Alumni Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 76 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
70 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 70 of the 167 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND ↗
- Who funds GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds WARNER PACIFIC UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Linfield University ↗
- Who funds WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds FRESNO PACIFIC UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds University of San Francisco ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds California State University Fresno Alumni Association Incorporated ↗
- Who funds CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds LEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CARROLL COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Grand Canyon University ↗
- Who funds PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE COLORADO COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds The President and Trustees of Colby College ↗
- Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Enterprise Holdings Foundation · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Lilly Endowment Inc · Leo Adler Trust · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Tulsa Community Foundation · Oregon Alliance of Independent Colleges & Universities · Jefferson Scholarship Fund · Ghidotti Wm Marian T U A · Mario Pedrozzi Scholarship Foundation · Wf & Blanche E West Educational & Coffman Jf · The Robert D and Patricia E Kern Family Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dale Krueger Scholarship funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Warner Pacific University — 8% of income from government
- Pacific University — 5% of income from government
- Willamette University — 4% of income from government
- Linfield University — 4% of income from government
- Corban University — 4% of income from government
- George Fox University — 3% of income from government
- Lewis & Clark College — 2% of income from government
- University of Portland — 2% of income from government
- Wellesley College — 1% of income from government
- The Trustees of the Smith College — 0% of income from government
- Oral Roberts University — 0% of income from government
- Reed Institute — 0% of income from government
- Bentley University — 0% of income from government
- Williams College — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.