Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lane Legare Harper Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Health$35kEducation$31kArts & Culture$26kAnimals$11kEnvironment$10kPhilanthropy$3k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASSN FOR THE BLIND & VISUALLY IMPRD$12,000
HALLIE HILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY$6,000
CAMPERDON ACADEMY$5,000
TRIDENT TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATN$5,000
ROPER ST FRANCIS FOUNDATION$5,000
HIBERNIAN SOCIETY CHAS FOUNDATION$5,000
LOWCOUNTRY LAND TRUST$5,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILL$3,000
COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON FOUNDATION$2,500
MUSC FOUNDATION$2,500
MUSC CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FUND$2,500
CHARLESTON LIBRARY SOCIETY$2,000
SC HISTORICAL SOCIETY$2,000
CHARLESTON MUSEUM$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CAMPERDON ACADEMY: $5k → 10%SC HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5k → 12%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILL: $3k → 10%MUSC CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FUND: $5k → 12%CAMPERDON ACADEMY: $5k → 10%GIBBES MUSEUM OF ART: $3k → 12%MUSC CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FUND: $3k → 12%SC HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2k → 12%MUSC FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%CHARLESTON LIBRARY SOCIETY: $2k → 12%MUSC FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%CHARLESTON LIBRARY SOCIETY: $2k → 12%ASSN FOR THE BLIND & VISUALLY IMPRD: $12k → 12%ASSN FOR THE BLIND & VISUALLY IMPRD: $5k → 12%HALLIE HILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $6k → 12%TRIDENT TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATN: $5k → 12%HALLIE HILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $5k → 12%TRIDENT TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATN: $5k → 12%COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%ROPER ST FRANCIS FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%ROPER ST FRANCIS FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%LOWCOUNTRY LAND TRUST: $5k → 12%LOWCOUNTRY LAND TRUST: $5k → 12%CHARLESTON MUSEUM: $3k → 12%CHARLESTON MUSEUM: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$110k · 13 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
1

Total granted

$110k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+13%

Still filing today

62%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
HealthEducationArts & CultureAnimalsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LL
    LOWCOUNTRY LAND TRUST INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k · revenue +114%
  • CO
    COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $8k · revenue +9%
  • MU
    MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $8k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • CA
    CAROLINA ART ASSOCIATION DBA GIBBES MUSEUM OF ART
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Carolina Aquarium

Our mission is to inspire conservation of the natural world by exhibiting and caring for animals, by excelling in education and research, and by providing an exceptional visitor experience.

Animals
2
Conway Hospital Foundation Inc

The conway hospital foundation is a not-for-profit corporation established in 1988 as a charitable organization to provide support to conway hospital in its effort to fullfill its mission and goals. (see schedule o) description of…

Health
3
Coastal Carolinas Health Alliance

Facilitate networking among hospitals

Health
4
Conway Hospital Community Services

Conway hospital community services provides outpatient health care services to horry county and the surrounding community in conjunction with conway hospital, inc., a non-profit acute care hospital system.

Health
5
Rhode Island School of Design

The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…

Education
6
Sc Chamber of Commerce

Enhancing the quality of life for all south carolinians, achieving global competiteveness and ultimately increasing prosperity for sc citizens.

—
7
Charleston School of Law

The mission of the charleston school of law foundation inc is to encourage and assist the study, teaching, promoting and research of the rule of law in charleston, south carolina and all related subject areas as determined by the board of…

Education
8
Community Foundation of the Lowcountry

The Community Foundation's mission is strengthening community by connecting people, resources, and needs.

Philanthropy
9
Carolina Small Business Development Fund

Our mission is to foster economic development in underserved communities by providing capital, business services, and policy research to support small businesses.

Public Benefit
10
Carolina Meadows Foundation Inc

To solicit and receive gifts, grants, bequests and contributions for the support of carolina meadows, inc. in order to enhance or extend its mission, programs, services, and facilities.

Human Services
11
Charleston Waterkeeper

Charleston waterkeeper's mission it to protect and restore charleston's waterways for our community and future generations. we do that through an effective mix of boots-on-the-water stewardship and data-driven advocacy designed to protect…

Environment
12
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Charleston Museum; the most unlike its peers is Hallie Hill Animal Sanctuary F/K/a Hallie Hill Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASSN FOR THE BLIND & VISUALLY IMPRD: $17,000 · OtherASSN FOR THE BLIND & VISUALLY IMPRDTRIDENT TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATN: $10,000 · OtherTRIDENT TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATNHIBERNIAN SOCIETY CHAS FOUNDATION: $7,500 · OtherHIBERNIAN SOCIETY CHAS FOUNDATIONSC HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $7,000 · OtherSC HISTORICAL SOCIETYCharleston Library Society: $4,000 · OtherCharleston Library SocietyMUSC FOUNDATION: $3,500 · OtherMUSC FOUNDATIONRoper St Francis Foundation: $10,000 · HealthRoper St Francis …MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION: $7,500 · HealthMEDICAL UNIVERSIT…CAMPERDOWN ACADEMY INC: $10,000 · EducationCAMPERDOWN ACADEM…COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON FOUNDATION: $7,500 · EducationCOLLEGE OF CHARLE…HALLIE HILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY F/K/A HALLIE HILL INC: $11,000 · AnimalsHALLIE HIL…LOWCOUNTRY LAND TRUST INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentLOWCOUNTR…The Charleston Museum: $4,500 · Arts & CultureCAROLINA ART ASSOCIATION DBA GIBBES MUSEUM OF ART: $2,500 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC: $3,000 · Philanthropy
Other$49,000Health$17,500Education$17,500Animals$11,000Environment$10,000Arts & Culture$7,000Philanthropy$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHALLIE HILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY F/K/A HALLIE HILL INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY LAND TRUST INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRoper St Francis Foundation: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAMPERDOWN ACADEMY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLEGE OF CHARLESTON FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Charleston Museum: $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCharleston Library Society: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCAROLINA ART ASSOCIATION DBA GIBBES MUSEUM OF ART: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Harper Family FoundationSC20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Harper Family Foundation · John M Rivers Jr Foundation · Guffey Family Foundation · The Stony Point Foundation · The Ceres Foundation Inc · South Carolina Humanities Council Inc · Henry & Sylvia Yaschik Foundation Inc · Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lane Legare Harper Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lane Legare Harper Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lane Legare Harper Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Lane Legare Harper Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lane Legare Harper’s filings →

    More from the funding graph