Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Harper Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$138k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$69k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$2.5MArts & Culture$83kEducation$74kHealth$74kReligion$53kEnvironment$21kRecreation & Sports$15kHuman Services$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$68,751
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LANE LEGARE HARPER FOUNDATION$68,751
GREENVILLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$68,751
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SHARE THE MAGIC FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%SHARE THE MAGIC FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%SAFE HARBOR INC: $10k → 10%SAFE HARBOR INC: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
OH
CO
VA
NM
NC
SC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 35 repeat orgs$128k to everyone else

35 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 34 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
21

Total granted

$1.5M
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+72%

Still filing today

63%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $69k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
Arts & CultureHealthEducationEnvironmentPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GA
    GREENVILLE ARTS FESTIVAL
    7× · 2017–2023 · $17k · revenue +58%
  • SH
    SAFE HARBOR INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $13k · revenue +169%
  • CR
    C Rivers Stone Foundation
    2× · 2019–2020 · $11k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • PF
    PAST FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue +7%
  • GS
    GREENVILLE SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +1%
  • GI
    GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +395%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conestee Foundation Inc

Through responsible stewardship of our unique ecological resource, we provide inclusive opportunities for meaningful connection, discovery, and education in nature.

Environment
2
Charleston Waterkeeper

Charleston waterkeeper's mission it to protect and restore charleston's waterways for our community and future generations. we do that through an effective mix of boots-on-the-water stewardship and data-driven advocacy designed to protect…

Environment
3
Foundation for the Carolinas

Inspiring philanthropy and strengthening our region through innovative community initiatives and quality services to donors and constituents.

Philanthropy
4
South Carolina Aquarium

Our mission is to inspire conservation of the natural world by exhibiting and caring for animals, by excelling in education and research, and by providing an exceptional visitor experience.

Animals
5
Center for Heirs' Property Preservation

(See Schedule O)

Crime & Legal
6
Conway Hospital Foundation Inc

The conway hospital foundation is a not-for-profit corporation established in 1988 as a charitable organization to provide support to conway hospital in its effort to fullfill its mission and goals. (see schedule o) description of…

Health
7
Green Hill Center for North Carolina Art

The mission of green hill center for nc art is to promote the visual arts of north carolina by engaging a broad community of artists, adults and children through dynamic exhibitions and educational programs while providing a platform for…

Arts & Culture
8
Central Carolina Community Foundation

Central carolina community foundation is a nonprofit community foundation that connects and mobilizes people and resources to strengthen the midlands of south carolina. the foundation partners with donors, nonprofit organizations,…

Philanthropy
9
North Carolina Biotechnology Center

The north carolina biotechnology center aids the biotechnology-related efforts of researchers, businesses, state and federal governments, and other agencies primarily through awards of grants and loans related to specific programs and…

Science & Tech
10
Clemson University Research Foundation

To generate research funding opportunities for clemson university to support research initiatives that advance university discoveries to create new products and services for public use and benefit.

Education
11
Greenville Center for Creative Arts

The greenville center for creative arts exists to enrich the cultural fabric of the communities we serve by providing a nurturing environment for art-education, appreciation and enjoyment, and by establishing a lasting legacy in the visual…

Arts & Culture
12
Sc Chamber of Commerce

Enhancing the quality of life for all south carolinians, achieving global competiteveness and ultimately increasing prosperity for sc citizens.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A Child's Haven Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lane Legare Harper Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySouth Carolina Regional Org…Greenville Community Develo…Hospital Systems and Physic…University Support Organiza…Child Welfare & Development…College Fraternities and So…South Carolina Land Conserv…Charter and Alternative Sch…Dog and Cat RescueRegional Economic Developme…Performing Arts Organizatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%0%<5yr15%3%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr14%21%20–35yr11%27%35–55yr17%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr14%4%20–35yr11%4%35–55yr17%91%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/39
the rest of the field
13%
756/5,732

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
30/37
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC — $1,224,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INCLANE LEGARE HARPER FOUNDATION — $1,187,204 · PhilanthropyLANE LEGARE HARPER FOUNDATION+2 more — $13,000 · PhilanthropyGREENVILLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $68,751 · OtherGREENVILLE…THE POINT CHURCH — $31,000 · OtherTHE POINT …ASSOC BLIND & VISUALLY IMPAIRED SC — $18,000 · OtherASSOC BLIN…USC EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $15,256 · OtherUSC EDUCAT…YMCA CAMP GREENVILLE — $15,000 · OtherYMCA CAMP …SC HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $13,500 · OtherLAURENS COUNTY MUSEUM — $13,000 · OtherPALMETTO HILLS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $12,000 · OtherLIFE DIRECTION MINISTRIES — $10,000 · Other+23 more — $76,500 · Other+23 moreGREENVILLE ARTS FESTIVAL — $17,000 · Arts & CulturePAST FOUNDATION — $11,000 · Arts & CultureGREENVILLE SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $10,000 · Arts & CultureCAROLINA ART ASSOCIATION DBA GIBBES MUSEUM OF ART — $5,500 · Arts & CultureHAGOOD MILL FOUNDATION — $2,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $1,000 · Arts & CultureCANCER SURVIVORS PARK ALLIANCE — $25,000 · HealthRoper St Francis Foundation — $7,500 · HealthNURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP — $2,000 · HealthDEFENDERS FOR CHILDREN — $1,500 · Health+1 more — $1,000 · HealthGREENVILLE TECH FOUNDATION INC — $21,000 · EducationCAMPERDOWN ACADEMY INC — $7,000 · EducationLANGSTON FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 · Education+1 more — $200 · EducationSAFE HARBOR INC — $12,500 · Human ServicesMIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES INC — $4,500 · Human ServicesSHARE THE MAGIC FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 · Human ServicesLOWCOUNTRY LAND TRUST INC — $8,500 · EnvironmentGREEN INFRASTRUCTURE CENTER INC — $5,000 · EnvironmentUPSTATE FOREVER — $4,000 · EnvironmentCharleston Horticultural Society — $3,000 · Environment
Philanthropy$2,424,204Other$273,007Arts & Culture$46,500Health$37,000Education$31,200Human Services$21,000Environment$20,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC — $1,224,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetLANE LEGARE HARPER FOUNDATION — $1,187,204 over 2y, 94% of budgetCANCER SURVIVORS PARK ALLIANCE — $25,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetGREENVILLE TECH FOUNDATION INC — $21,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGREENVILLE ARTS FESTIVAL — $17,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetSAFE HARBOR INC — $12,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetC Rivers Stone Foundation — $11,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetPAST FOUNDATION — $11,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGREENVILLE SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMEYER CENTER FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN — $9,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY LAND TRUST INC — $8,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRoper St Francis Foundation — $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAMPERDOWN ACADEMY INC — $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCharleston Library Society — $7,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetIzzies Pond Inc — $6,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTHE ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONSERVANCY — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAROLINA ART ASSOCIATION DBA GIBBES MUSEUM OF ART — $5,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON CENTER PTA — $5,000 over 4y, 27% of budgetMIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES INC — $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE THE MAGIC FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUPSTATE FOREVER — $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetA Child's Haven Inc — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF MCCORMICK SC INC — $3,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCharleston Horticultural Society — $3,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMETROPOLITAN ARTS COUNCIL — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLOCAL BOYS DO GOOD — $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHAGOOD MILL FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEFENDERS FOR CHILDREN — $1,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetThe Charleston Museum — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARMENS RESCUE — $1,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetCLARITY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC
  • Who funds LANE LEGARE HARPER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CANCER SURVIVORS PARK ALLIANCE
  • Who funds GREENVILLE TECH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds GREENVILLE ARTS FESTIVAL
  • Who funds SAFE HARBOR INC
  • Who funds C Rivers Stone Foundation
  • Who funds PAST FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GREENVILLE SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds MEYER CENTER FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN
  • Who funds LOWCOUNTRY LAND TRUST INC
  • Who funds Roper St Francis Foundation
  • Who funds CAMPERDOWN ACADEMY INC
  • Who funds Charleston Library Society
  • Who funds Izzies Pond Inc
  • Who funds THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds CAROLINA ART ASSOCIATION DBA GIBBES MUSEUM OF ART
  • Who funds GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE CENTER INC
  • Who funds WASHINGTON CENTER PTA
  • Who funds MIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds SHARE THE MAGIC FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds UPSTATE FOREVER
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD CANCER CONNECTION
  • Who funds A Child's Haven Inc
  • Who funds FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF MCCORMICK SC INC
  • Who funds Charleston Horticultural Society
  • Who funds LANGSTON FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Daniel-Mickel FoundationSC30.4× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Daniel-Mickel Foundation · Hayne Hipp Foundation · Charles Timmons Foundation · John I Smith Charities Inc · Yeargin Foundation · Charity Ball Board of Greenville · Scsymmes Foundation · Dabo's All in Team Foundation · Lane Legare Harper Foundation · Jean T and Heyward G Pelham Foundation · The Maddrey Foundation · Scansource Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Harper Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Harper Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Harper Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph