Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Lakes Area United Way

The mission of crow wing county united way inc.

$85k
Granted FY2022
2
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Health$94kHuman Services$91kYouth Development$32kCrime & Legal$6k
02FY2022 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $12,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $85,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $72,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$6,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$305k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KINSHIP PARTNERS$6,500
BREATH OF LIFE ADULT SERVICE$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $97k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES: $23k → 11%FAMILY SAFETY NETWORK: $6k → 14%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES: $23k → 11%MID-MINNESOTA WOMENS CENTER: $14k → 11%BREATH OF LIFE ADULT SERVICE: $7k → 11%BREATH OF LIFE ADULT SERVICE: $6k → 11%BREATH OF LIFE ADULT SERVICE: $6k → 11%BREATH OF LIFE ADULT SERVICE: $6k → 11%MID-MINNESOTA WOMENS CENTER: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$217k · 9 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +78% since the first grant, against -5% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2022, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
1

Total granted

$217k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
-5%

Still filing today

78%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22
Human ServicesHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LS
    LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA
    2× · 2017–2018 · $46k · revenue +78%
  • BO
    BRIDGES OF HOPE
    3× · 2017–2019 · $30k · revenue +133%
  • BO
    BREATH OF LIFE ADULT DAY SERVICE
    4× · 2017–2022 · $26k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • FS
    FAMILY SAFETY NETWORK OF CASS COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue -5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
2
Stillwater Domestic Violence

Stillwater domestic violance dba wings of hope: the wings of hope family crisis services provides comprehensive services to individual experiencing domestic violence, sexual assault, stalkin and child abuse. the agency strives to provide…

Human Services
3
Hope Crisis Center

Hope crisis center provides crisis line services and shelter to domestic violence and sexual assault victims

Health
4
S a F E Shelter

We are committed to helping victims of sexual assault and abuse and domestic assault and abuse through advocacy support and education. We provide emergency shelter to domestic assault victims. We Also are committed to educating the public…

5
Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault Services of Whatcom County

The mission of domestic violence and sexual assault services is to support individuals affected by domestic violence, sexual assault, and sexual exploitation, and to lead the community toward ending these abuses of power.

Health
6
A Safe Place

Emergency shelter for victims of domestic violence.

7
Advocates for Family Peace

To improve lives by ending domestic violence.

Human Services
8
Sexual Violence Center

Sexual violence center's vision is that no one impacted by sexual violence should navigate alone. to achieve our vision, we've made it our mission to support people impacted by sexual violence through crisis intervention, case management,…

Health
9
Spouse Abusesexual Assault Crisis Center

To provide support, guidance and education to men, women and children to promote a life free of domestic and sexual violence.

Human Services
10
Safehouse Crisis Center Inc

To provide shelter and advocacy services to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking in the 11 counties of southeast kansas.

Human Services
11
Life Crisis Center Inc

To improve the quality of life in our community through crisis intervention and violence prevention.

Human Services
12
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bridges of Hope and the most unlike its peers is Breath of Life Adult Day Service. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA — $46,000 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTABREATH OF LIFE ADULT DAY SERVICE — $25,600 · Human ServicesBREATH OF LIFE ADULT DAY SERVICEMID-MINNESOTA WOMEN'S CENTER INC — $19,500 · Human ServicesMID-MINNESOTA WOMEN'S CENTER INCFAMILY SAFETY NETWORK OF CASS COUNTY INC — $5,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY SAFETY NETWORK OF CASS COUNTY INCSALVATION ARMY — $27,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYKINSHIP PARTNERS INC — $20,500 · OtherKINSHIP PARTNERS INCCONFIDENCE LEARNING CENTER INC — $16,000 · OtherCONFIDENCE LEARNING CENTER INCRIVERVIEW CHURCH — $11,000 · OtherRIVERVIEW CHURCHBRIDGES OF HOPE — $30,000 · HealthBRIDGES OF HOPESEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES INC — $21,000 · HealthSEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES IN…
Human Services$96,600Other$74,500Health$51,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA — $46,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGES OF HOPE — $30,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetBREATH OF LIFE ADULT DAY SERVICE — $25,600 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetSEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES INC — $21,000 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetKINSHIP PARTNERS INC — $20,500 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetMID-MINNESOTA WOMEN'S CENTER INC — $19,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCONFIDENCE LEARNING CENTER INC — $16,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFAMILY SAFETY NETWORK OF CASS COUNTY INC — $5,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

CommunitygivingMN15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communitygiving · Initiative Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Essentia Health Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lakes Area United Way funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $40k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph