Skip to content

· Public charity

Lake Street Council

Lake Street Council engages, serves, and advocates for the Lake Street business community in Minneapolis to ensure the vitality and prosperity of the commercial corridor.

$559k
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$1.6MArts & Culture$1.4MFood & Nutrition$1.3MHuman Services$1.0MCommunity Improvement$939kHousing & Shelter$400kYouth Development$316kReligion$276kOther$0
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 26 grants below total $416,941, the rows itemized in this filing. The $558,735 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $141,794 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $271k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$10,648
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Lul Bros Properties$50,000
Southside Community Health Services Inc$50,000
Kushite Art Gallery LLC$27,500
Grass Roots LLC$25,000
Don Pedro LLC$25,000
Dem Properties$25,000
Odigo Properties LLC$24,500
Solcana Fitness LLC$22,000
Taco Taxi Inc$14,350
Jungle Theatre$13,000
New York Plaza LLC$12,500
Greater Minneapolis Council of Churches (GMCC)$11,080
Umbra Arts LLC$10,648
Queermunity Collaborative LLC$10,000
Lake Auto Center$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $273k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%East Philips Neighborhood Institute: $10k → 11%Project for Pride in living: $50k → 11%Neighborhood Development Center: $66k → 14%Hourcar: $20k → 14%Somali American Community: $8k → 11%YWCA of Minneapolis: $6k → 11%TAYSEER CENTER: $25k → 11%KALY RADIO: $25k → 11%Uptown Association: $15k → 11%MAD DADS OF MLPS: $10k → 11%LONGFELLOWSEWARD HEALTHY SENIORS: $13k → 11%The Family Partnership: $25k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

16%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 31 repeat orgs$7.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
394

Total granted

$1.4M
$7.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+26%

Still filing today

29%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $356k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthCommunity ImprovementEmploymentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SR
    SEWARD REDESIGN INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $115k · revenue +63%
  • FP
    FIREHOUSE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER
    2× · 2020–2021 · $30k · revenue +240%
  • CA
    CHICAGO AVENUE FIRE ARTS CENTER
    2× · 2021–2022 · $25k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • AD
    APEX DENTAL SYSTEMS DBA MINNESOTA DENTAL CARE
    one grant, 2020 · $125k
  • BP
    BANADIR PHARMACY LLC
    one grant, 2020 · $125k
  • CL
    CHICAGO LAKE FAMILY DENTAL
    one grant, 2020 · $125k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wonderlust Productions

Wonderlust Productions is a multicultural, multi-disciplinary arts ensemble that illuminates a community's story through performance, mixing community members from across generations, ethnicities, and perspectives, alongside an ensemble of…

Arts & Culture
2
Minneapolis Climate Action

Minneapolis Climate Action is a 501c(3) nonprofit founded in 2007 by a group of dedicated individuals committed to addressing climate change in their community. After almost 10 years of working at the neighborhood level and piloting the…

Environment
3
Center for Economic Inclusion

The Center for Economic Inclusion is an organization committed to strengthening the Minneapolis - Saint Paul region's civic infrastructure and collective capacity to disrupt systems and influence market forces to catalyze shared prosperity…

Community Improvement
4
Minnesota Voice

Minnesota Voice is a collaboration of organizations working toward permanent change in social, racial, and economic justice by increasing civic engagement and voter participation across the state.

Public Benefit
5
Sahan Journal

Sahan Journal provides immigrants and communities of color with free, fair, and responsive journalism that shows everyone the way to a more equitable Minnesota.

Education
6
The Cedar Cultural Center Inc

To promote intercultural appreciation and understanding through the presentation of global music and dance. The Cedar is committed to artistic excellence and integrity, diversity of programming, support for emerging artists and community…

Arts & Culture
7
African Development Center

Grow businesses, build wealth and increase reinvestement in the african communities of minnesota

Human Services
8
Lake Street Council

Lake Street Council engages, serves, and advocates for the Lake Street business community in Minneapolis to ensure the vitality and prosperity of the commercial corridor. The Lake Street Council fosters economic vitality and amplifies Lake…

Community Improvement
9
The City Theatre Company Inc

To provide an artistic home for the development and production of contemporary plays that engage and challenge a diverse audience.

Arts & Culture
10
Coalition of Asian American Leaders

The Coalition of Asian American Leaders (CAAL) is a network organization of Asian Minnesotan leaders harnessing our collective power to improve the lives of community.

Arts & Culture
11
Arts Midwest Incorporated

Arts Midwest works collaboratively with private and public arts supporters to support, inform, and celebrate arts organizations and creative communities across the Midwest. Our mission is to build unprecedented opportunity across the…

Arts & Culture
12
Milwaukee Public Theatre Inc

Making the arts accessible to all

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Springboard for the Arts; the most unlike its peers is Take-Up Productions. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 446 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/38
Grantees still filing
25/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

+183 more: $5,478,984 · Other+183 moreSEWARD REDESIGN INC: $115,000 · Arts & CulturePangea World Theater: $112,500 · Arts & CultureFIREHOUSE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $30,000 · Arts & CultureSOMALI MUSEUM AND CULTURAL CENTER: $25,000 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO AVENUE FIRE ARTS CENTER: $24,875 · Arts & CultureTHE JUNGLE THEATER: $23,000 · Arts & CultureNEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $66,286 · Human ServicesPROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesSomali American Community: $32,500 · Human ServicesTC FOR COMMUNITY: $25,000 · Human ServicesThe Family Partnership: $25,000 · Human ServicesHOURCAR: $20,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNIDADES LATINAS UNIDAS EN SERVICO INC: $100,000 · EmploymentMIGIZI Communications Inc: $80,000 · EducationCITY OF LAKES COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterSOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $50,000 · HealthGREATER MINNEAPOLIS COUNCIL OF CHURCHES: $23,080 · Religion
Other$5,478,984Arts & Culture$330,375Human Services$218,786Employment$100,000Education$80,000Housing & Shelter$50,000Health$50,000Religion$23,080

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSEWARD REDESIGN INC: $115,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetPangea World Theater: $112,500 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetCOMMUNIDADES LATINAS UNIDAS EN SERVICO INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMIGIZI Communications Inc: $80,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $66,286 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCITY OF LAKES COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $50,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSomali American Community: $32,500 over 2y, 11% of budgetFIREHOUSE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $30,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetSOMALI MUSEUM AND CULTURAL CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetThe Family Partnership: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHICAGO AVENUE FIRE ARTS CENTER: $24,875 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetGREATER MINNEAPOLIS COUNCIL OF CHURCHES: $23,080 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE JUNGLE THEATER: $23,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetHOURCAR: $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SEWARD REDESIGN INC ↗
  • Who funds Pangea World Theater ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNIDADES LATINAS UNIDAS EN SERVICO INC ↗
  • Who funds MIGIZI Communications Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY OF LAKES COMMUNITY LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds Somali American Community ↗
  • Who funds FIREHOUSE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Urban Ventures Leadership FoundationMN77.1× affinity37 shared granteesties to 0 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Urban Ventures Leadership Foundation · The McKnight Foundation · Target Foundation · Headwaters Foundation for Justice · Propel Nonprofits · The Minneapolis Foundation · The James M Stanton Foundation · Pohlad Family Foundation · Minnesota Humanities Center · Allina Health System · Youthprise · Northwest Area Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lake Street Council funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lake Street Council. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 446 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lake Street Council’s filings →

    More from the funding graph