Skip to content

· Private foundation

LAJCK Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$307k
Granted FY2025still arriving
34
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$686kReligion$452kPhilanthropy$225kHousing & Shelter$216kHealth$95kHuman Services$25kArts & Culture$20kRecreation & Sports$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $72k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $184k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
$5,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$6.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Viator High School$50,850
Holy Family Catholic Church$40,400
Schaumburg Hoffman Estates Rotary Foundation$30,800
Individual grant recipient$25,000
St Benedict's Abbey$20,000
St Joseph's Church$18,000
Center for Healthcare Innovation$15,000
University of Iowa Center for Advancement$15,000
Duchesne Academy$10,000
Pulse$10,000
St Mary's College$8,000
The Lawrence Community Shelter$7,500
LBFE - Little Brothers-Friends of the Elderly$7,500
University of Chicago$5,000
AANE -The Asperger Autism Network$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $5k → 21%EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $5k → 21%The Night Ministry: $5k → 14%The Night Ministry: $3k → 14%LBFE - Little Brothers-Friends of the Elderly: $8k → 14%The Bloc: $1k → 14%JOURNEYS - THE ROAD HOME: $15k → 14%JOURNEYS - THE ROAD HOME: $10k → 14%JOURNEYS - THE ROAD HOME: $8k → 14%JOURNEYS - THE ROAD HOME: $5k → 14%Journeys - The Road Home: $5k → 14%Journeys - The Road Home: $5k → 14%JOURNEYS - THE ROAD HOME: $5k → 14%JOURNEYS - THE ROAD HOME: $5k → 14%Street Samaritans: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
NJ
NE
VA
KS
TN
NC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 32 repeat orgs$141k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
21

Total granted

$1.9M
$90k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+4%

Still filing today

28%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LAWRENCE COMMUNITY SHELTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $142k · revenue +301%
  • PT
    PADS TO HOPE DBA-JOURNEYS THE ROAD HOME
    8× · 2018–2025 · $58k · revenue +15%
  • University of Chicago
    7× · 2019–2025 · $31k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • SJ
    St Joseph Church
    one grant, 2024 · $18k
  • AS
    AFTER SCHOOL MATTERS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +69%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.

Human Services
2
Chicago Heightening Opportunity and Potential for

Providing academic support to children experiencing homelessness in Chicago and providing resources and services to families experiencing homelessness in Chicago.

Education
3
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
4
Center for Housing and Health

Chh honors every person's right to a home and health care, by bridging the housing and health care systems, to improve the lives of chicagoans experiencing homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
5
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
6
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
7
Loyola University of Chicago

We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.

Education
8
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
9
The University of Chicago Charter School Corporation

To Prepare Students for Success in Four-Year Colleges.

Education
10
Junior Achievement of Chicago

To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy

International
11
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
12
The Chicago Scholars Foundation

Chicago scholars is transforming the leadership landscape of our city by resolving the fundamental barriers to success for academically driven, first generation college students from under-resourced communities.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is After School Matters Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blue Ridge Prism Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/24
Grantees still filing
13/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAINT VIATOR HIGH SCHOOL: $304,374 · OtherSAINT VIATOR HIGH SCHOOLSchaumburg Hoffman Estates Rotary Foundation: $219,100 · OtherSchaumburg Hoffman Estates Rotary FoundationUNIVERSITY OF IOWA TIPPIE COLLEGE OF BUSINESS: $157,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IOWA TIPPIE COLLEGE OF BUSINESSIndividual grant recipient: $153,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHoly Family Catholic Church: $152,750 · OtherHoly Family Catholic ChurchST BENEDICTS ABBEY: $121,750 · OtherST BENEDICTS ABBEYST JOSEPH: $97,000 · OtherST JOSEPHDuchesne Academy: $55,500 · Other+41 more: $358,950 · Other+41 moreLAWRENCE COMMUNITY SHELTER INC: $142,000 · Housing & ShelterUniversity of Chicago: $30,500 · EducationSTATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationHFS CHICAGO SCHOLARS: $19,040 · EducationAFTER SCHOOL MATTERS INC: $10,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $5,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationPADS TO HOPE DBA-JOURNEYS THE ROAD HOME: $58,000 · Human ServicesTHE EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $10,000 · Human ServicesLITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $7,500 · Human ServicesTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $7,500 · Human Services+2 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR HEALTHCARE INNOVATION: $64,500 · HealthAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $5,000 · Health+2 more: $2,250 · HealthBLUE RIDGE PRISM INC: $4,500 · EnvironmentUSA Boccia Inc: $4,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,619,624Housing & Shelter$142,000Education$95,540Human Services$85,000Health$71,750Environment$4,500Recreation & Sports$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLAWRENCE COMMUNITY SHELTER INC: $142,000 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetCENTER FOR HEALTHCARE INNOVATION: $64,500 over 7y, 6.8% of budgetPADS TO HOPE DBA-JOURNEYS THE ROAD HOME: $58,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $30,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSTATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHFS CHICAGO SCHOLARS: $19,040 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetAFTER SCHOOL MATTERS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHANNAH AND FRIENDS NEIGHBORHOOD INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE RIDGE PRISM INC: $4,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetUSA Boccia Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetViator House of Hospitality: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BLOC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BACKYARD EXPERIENCE: $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTFK Chicago Voyagers: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Houston: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LAWRENCE COMMUNITY SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR HEALTHCARE INNOVATION ↗
  • Who funds PADS TO HOPE DBA-JOURNEYS THE ROAD HOME ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HFS CHICAGO SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds AFTER SCHOOL MATTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE EMPOWERMENT PLAN ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY ↗
  • Who funds THE NIGHT MINISTRY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL18.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Reva and David Logan Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization LAJCK Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from LAJCK Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to LAJCK Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to LAJCK Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on LAJCK’s filings →

    More from the funding graph