Skip to content

· Private foundation

Laird Youth Leadership Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$153kEducation$100kHealth$78kHuman Services$40kArts & Culture$34kYouth Development$31kCrime & Legal$30kReligion$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION$10,000
SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND$5,000
LOAVES AND FISHES$5,000
CENTER FOR DOMESTIC PEACE$5,000
SHEPHERD'S TABLE$5,000
WASHBURN CENTER FOR CHILDREN$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION$5,000
JUMP IN FOUNDATION INC DBA MIRACLE LEAGUE OF DANE COUNTY$5,000
THE COMMUNITY TABLE$5,000
SPARK THE JOURNEY$2,500
WAY TO GROW$2,500
YMCA OF THE NORTH$2,500
WISCONSIN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ARTS & LETTERS$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%HOPE HOSPICE: $5k → 11%WAY TO GROW: $3k → 11%WAY TO GROW: $3k → 11%WAY TO GROW: $3k → 11%YMCA OF THE NORTH: $3k → 11%WAY TO GROW: $3k → 11%WAY TO GROW: $3k → 11%WAY TO GROW: $3k → 11%WAY TO GROW: $2k → 11%WAY TO GROW: $2k → 11%WAY TO GROW: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
MA
VA
MD
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Laird Youth Leadership Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Laird Youth Leadership Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$478k · 22 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
13

Total granted

$478k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
-7%

Still filing today

82%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureFood & NutritionCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND
    6× · 2020–2025 · $80k · revenue +17%
  • TC
    The Community Table Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $43k · revenue +93%
  • TS
    The Shepherds Table Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $30k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • W4
    WI 4-H FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • WO
    WIPPS OBEY CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • CC
    CARLETON COLLEGE
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
2
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
3
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
4
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce

Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.

—
5
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
6
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
7
Minnesota Council of Nonprofits Inc

The Minnesota Council of Nonprofits informs, promotes, connects and strengthens individual nonprofits and the nonprofit sector.

Philanthropy
8
Mn Community Measurement

Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.

Health
9
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
10
Minnesota Jewish Community Center

The minnesota jcc is dedicated to strengthening our community by providing inclusive programs that inspire personal growth, foster connection, and promote well-being through arts, culture, education, fitness, early childhood, day camp and…

—
11
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
12
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marshfield Clinic Health System Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Camp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
16/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOAVES AND FISHES: $30,000 · OtherLOAVES AND FISHESThe Shepherds Table Inc: $30,000 · OtherThe Shepherds Table IncCAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INC: $11,000 · OtherCAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INCIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · OtherMANY HANDS INC: $11,500 · OtherMANY HANDS INCMARSHFIELD AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 · OtherYMCA of Martha's Vineyard Inc: $12,500 · OtherYMCA of Martha's Vineyard Inc+11 more: $37,000 · Other+11 moreSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $80,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST HEARTLANDThe Community Table Inc: $42,500 · Food & NutritionThe Community Table IncUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC: $71,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSI…LANDON SCHOOL: $13,500 · EducationLANDON SCHOOLSPARK THE JOURNEY: $10,000 · EducationSPARK THE JOURNEYEVERYBODY WINS DC INC: $5,500 · EducationCARLETON COLLEGE: $5,000 · Education+1 more: $2,000 · EducationMARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · HealthMARSHFIELD C…Washburn Center for Children: $5,000 · HealthWashburn Cen…BLADDER CANCER ADVOCACY NETWORK INC: $4,000 · HealthBLADDER CANC…MARSHFIELD CLINIC INC: $2,500 · HealthWAY TO GROW: $20,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTH: $7,500 · Human ServicesHOPE HOSPICE AND COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesCenter for Domestic Peace Inc: $30,000 · Crime & LegalWISCONSIN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ARTS AND LETTERS: $18,000 · Arts & CultureCamp: $7,500 · Arts & CulturePORTAGE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $3,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$154,500Food & Nutrition$122,500Education$107,000Health$61,500Human Services$32,500Crime & Legal$30,000Arts & Culture$28,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $80,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC: $71,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetMARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetThe Community Table Inc: $42,500 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetThe Shepherds Table Inc: $30,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCenter for Domestic Peace Inc: $30,000 over 9y, 54% of budgetWAY TO GROW: $20,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWISCONSIN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ARTS AND LETTERS: $18,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetLANDON SCHOOL: $13,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA of Martha's Vineyard Inc: $12,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMANY HANDS INC: $11,500 over 6y, 6.2% of budgetCAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INC: $11,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSPARK THE JOURNEY: $10,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMARSHFIELD AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCamp: $7,500 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTH: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYBODY WINS DC INC: $5,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetWashburn Center for Children: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARLETON COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPORTAGE COUNTY BUSINESS COUNCIL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHOPE HOSPICE AND COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLADDER CANCER ADVOCACY NETWORK INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPORTAGE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $3,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetMARSHFIELD CLINIC INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARROLL UNIVERSITY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Community Table Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Shepherds Table Inc ↗
  • Who funds Center for Domestic Peace Inc ↗
  • Who funds WAY TO GROW ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ARTS AND LETTERS ↗
  • Who funds LANDON SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds YMCA of Martha's Vineyard Inc ↗
  • Who funds MANY HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INC ↗
  • Who funds SPARK THE JOURNEY ↗
  • Who funds MARSHFIELD AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Camp ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTH ↗
  • Who funds EVERYBODY WINS DC INC ↗
  • Who funds Washburn Center for Children ↗
  • Who funds CARLETON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds PORTAGE COUNTY BUSINESS COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HOSPICE AND COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BLADDER CANCER ADVOCACY NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds PORTAGE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds MARSHFIELD CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds CARROLL UNIVERSITY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Herbert H Kohl Charities IncWI15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Community Foundation of Central Wisconsin Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Laird Youth Leadership Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Laird Youth Leadership Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Laird Youth Leadership Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Laird Youth Leadership Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Laird Youth Leadership’s filings →

    More from the funding graph