Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ladies Education Society

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$44k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$255kRecreation & Sports$7k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$6,129
Median grant
3
States reached
$823k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Illinois College$9,996
Southern Illinois University$9,865
University of Illinois$7,400
Illinois State University$6,129
Lewis and Clark College$5,367
American College of Education$3,629
Judson University$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%University of California San Diego: $5k → 11%Columbia College of Education: $2k → 16%University of Missouri - STL: $4k → 11%Hannibal LaGrange University: $3k → 12%Southeast Missouri State University: $3k → 14%Missouri University of Science and Technology: $4k → 16%Northwest Missouri State University: $3k → 17%St Louis University: $3k → 21%Lewis and Clark College: $5k → 12%University of Notre Dame: $3k → 13%American College of Education: $4k → 16%University of Illinois Springfield: $4k → 11%Illinois College: $10k → 12%Southern Illinois University: $10k → 12%Quincy University: $3k → 13%Methodist College: $3k → 14%EASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY: $5k → 18%University of Illinois: $7k → 19%Western Illinois University: $7k → 20%University of California San Diego: $3k → 11%University of Missouri St Louis: $3k → 11%Southeast Missouri State University: $3k → 14%ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $2k → 21%Lewis and Clark College: $4k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME: $2k → 13%American College of Education: $3k → 16%University of Illinois Springfield: $3k → 11%Illinois College: $5k → 12%Southern Illinois University: $5k → 12%QUINCY UNIVERSITY: $2k → 13%Eastern Illinois University: $2k → 18%University of Illinois: $5k → 19%Western Illinois University: $5k → 20%University of California San Diego: $3k → 11%Southeast Missouri State University: $3k → 14%Illinois College: $4k → 12%Eastern Illinois University: $2k → 18%University of Illinois: $5k → 19%Western Illinois University: $3k → 20%SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 14%Illinois College: $4k → 12%University of Illinois: $2k → 19%Western Illinois University: $3k → 20%Illinois College: $3k → 12%Western Illinois University: $3k → 20%ILLINOIS COLLEGE: $3k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $3k → 19%Western Illinois University: $2k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
OR
IN
CA
MO
AZ
SC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of Ladies Education Society’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 59% of the giving stays in IL; by stated purpose, 53%.

Ladies Education Societylessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 10% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$230k · 18 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +9% since the first grant, against -29% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
8

Total granted

$230k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
-29%

Still filing today

33%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    ILLINOIS COLLEGE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $33k · revenue +9%
  • LEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $12k · revenue +2%
  • GC
    Grand Canyon University
    2× · 2019–2020 · $9k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • UO
    University of Missouri - STL
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • WS
    WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • HL
    Hannibal LaGrange University
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue -29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
2
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
3
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
4
Saint John's University

To foster the vitality of community through learning and the pursuit of wisdom.

—
5
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
6
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
7
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
8
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
9
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
10
Clarke University of Dubuque Iowa

We are a Catholic, co-educational, liberal arts university founded in 1843 by the Sisters of Charity of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Dubuque, Iowa. Clarke educates students at the post-secondary level in the liberal arts and sciences, the…

Education
11
William Jessup University

In partnership with the church, the purpose of william jessup university is to educate transformational leaders for the glory of god.

—
12
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Louis University; the most unlike its peers is Southern Illinois University Alumni Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Illinois: $25,032 · OtherUniversity of IllinoisWestern Illinois University: $23,267 · OtherWestern Illinois UniversityIllinois State University: $21,353 · OtherIllinois State UniversitySoutheast Missouri State University: $11,960 · OtherSoutheast Missouri State UniversityUniversity of California San Diego: $11,300 · OtherUniversity of California San DiegoTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $9,933 · OtherTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOISEASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY: $9,624 · OtherEASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITYAmerican College of Education Inc: $8,990 · OtherAmerican College of Education IncMissouri University of Science and Technology: $6,996 · OtherUniversity of Missouri St Louis: $5,933 · OtherAmerican College of Education: $5,670 · Other+8 more: $24,378 · Other+8 moreILLINOIS COLLEGE: $33,318 · EducationILLINOIS COLLEGESOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $16,562 · EducationSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCI…LEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE: $12,363 · EducationLEWIS & CLARK COLLEGEGrand Canyon University: $9,162 · EducationGrand Canyon UniversityUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $6,993 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du LacQUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $6,993 · EducationQUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATIONST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $6,992 · EducationST LOUIS UNIVERSITYHannibal LaGrange University: $3,454 · Education+1 more: $2,000 · Education
Other$164,436Education$97,837

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetILLINOIS COLLEGE: $33,318 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $16,562 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetLEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE: $12,363 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGrand Canyon University: $9,162 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $6,993 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetQUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $6,993 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $6,992 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHannibal LaGrange University: $3,454 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDSON UNIVERSITY A BAPTIST INSTITUTION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ILLINOIS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds LEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Grand Canyon University ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds QUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Hannibal LaGrange University ↗
  • Who funds JUDSON UNIVERSITY A BAPTIST INSTITUTION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Collegiate Athletic AssociationIN13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Collegiate Athletic Association · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ladies Education Society funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ladies Education Society. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Lewis & Clark College: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ladies Education Society’s filings →

More from the funding graph