Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

La Raza Services Inc

To provide and advocate for culturally responsive, essential human services and opportunities.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$209k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Human Services$1.5MYouth Development$700kHealth$525kHousing & Shelter$269kEmployment$54kCivil Rights$15kCommunity Improvement$10k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $1.1M
$175,260
Median grant
2
States reached
$9.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DENVER ALLIANCE FOR STREET HEALTH RESPONSE DASHR$209,452
FACEIT COMMUNITY INC$191,628
MUSLIM FAMILY SERVICES OF COLORADO$180,610
STRUGGLE OF LOVE FOUNDATION$175,260
DENVER YOUTH PROGRAM GRASP$163,466
SERVICESOURCE INC$98,635
DENVER HEALING GENERATIONS NETWORK$90,000
Individual grant recipient$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $886k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%MUSLIM FAMILY SERVICES OF COLORADO: $72k → 8%MUSLIM FAMILY SERVICES OF COLORADO: $181k → 12%MUSLIM FAMILY SERVICES OF COLORADO: $153k → 12%STRUGGLE OF LOVE FOUNDATION: $200k → 12%STRUGGLE OF LOVE FOUNDATION: $175k → 12%STRUGGLE OF LOVE FOUNDATION: $101k → 12%FOUR WINDS COUNCIL: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 7 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
13

Total granted

$1.9M
$763k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+12%

Still filing today

43%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $358k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEmploymentPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    Struggle of Love Foundation
    3× · 2023–2025 · $476k · revenue +61%
  • MF
    MUSLIM FAMILY SERVICES OF COLORADO
    3× · 2023–2025 · $405k · revenue +11% · 49% of their budget
  • WT
    WORDS TO POWER
    2× · 2021–2022 · $60k · revenue ×57 · 29% of their budget

Funded once

  • CF
    COLORADANS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING
    one grant, 2023 · $230k
  • DA
    DENVER ALLIANCE FOR STREET HEALTH RESPONSE
    one grant, 2024 · $170k
  • GR
    GANG RESCUE AND SUPPORT PROJECT
    one grant, 2024 · $153k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Veterans Resource Coalition
Health
2
Mama Bird Doula Services

To improve the outcomes for Black Indigenous and People of Color, BIPOC, maternal health and their babies in our community.

Health
3
Latina Initiative Colorado

The latina initiative is committed to amplifying the voices of marginalized communities. we encourage latinas to vote to ensure they are heard by elected leaders at all levels.

Civil Rights
4
The Alliance for Community Wellness Dba La Familia Counseling Services

La Familia Counseling Service is an inclusive Latino community-based, multi-cultural organization committed to strengthening the emotional wellness of individuals and the preservation of families.

5
Fuerza Y Union Multiple

Our mission is to build stronger, healthier communities, rich in values and culture. We offer a safe space to access services with mutual and equal respect, working with and for the Latinx community.

Community Improvement
6
El Centro Amistad

Create opportunities and programs that promote health equity education and quality of life for the latino community in boulder county in colorado.

Human Services
7
Urban Outreach Denver

Urban Outreach Denver exists to connect people to God and to a community of support by caring for both short-term and long-term needs in the areas of food, clothing, shlter, medical care, education and job preparation.

Human Services
8
Western Colorado Migrant and Rural Coalition

WCMRC in partnership with agg community leaders, is the vanguard in achieving an excellent quality of life for rural, migrant, and seasonal farm workers, and their families, through advocacy for equitable access to community bases…

9
Valley Life for All

Creating access to resources by connecting opportunities for people of all disabilities, their families and communities, from Aspen to Parachute.

10
Colorado Ag Water Alliance

Works with farmers and ranchers to address water issues around the state impacting agriculture.

Environment
11
United Liberian Organization of Colorado

The United Liberian Organization Of Colorado ULOC is a non-profit organization with a mission to provide social services to Liberian immigrants and refugees in Colorado. They focus on various areas of support, including education, housing,…

Civil Rights
12
Colorado Access Foundation
Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hispanic Affairs Project and the most unlike its peers is Greater Denver Interfaith Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FACEIT COMMUNITY INC — $421,722 · OtherFACEIT COMMUNITY INCDENVER ALLIANCE FOR STREET HEALTH RESPONSE DASHR — $255,794 · OtherDENVER ALLIANCE FOR STREET HEALTH RESPONSE DASHRCOLORADANS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING — $230,000 · OtherCOLORADANS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSINGDENVER ALLIANCE FOR STREET HEALTH RESPONSE — $170,310 · OtherDENVER ALLIANCE FOR STREET HEALTH RESPONSEDENVER YOUTH PROGRAM GRASP — $163,466 · OtherDENVER YOUTH PROGRAM GRASPIndividual grant recipient — $155,914 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGANG RESCUE AND SUPPORT PROJECT — $152,762 · OtherGANG RESCUE AND SUPPORT PROJECTIndividual grant recipient — $145,221 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDENVER HEALING GENERATIONS NETWORK — $90,000 · Other+5 more — $106,581 · Other+5 moreStruggle of Love Foundation — $475,946 · Human ServicesStruggle of Love FoundationMUSLIM FAMILY SERVICES OF COLORADO — $405,303 · Human ServicesMUSLIM FAMILY SERVICES OF COLORAD…+2 more — $20,000 · Human ServicesServiceSource Inc — $98,635 · EmploymentBAYAUD ENTERPRISES INC — $54,204 · EmploymentWORDS TO POWER — $60,450 · PhilanthropyGreater Denver Interfaith Alliance — $15,000 · ReligionVOCES UNIDAS DE LAS MONTANAS — $10,000 · Public BenefitCULTIVANDO — $10,000 · Community Improvement
Other$1,891,770Human Services$901,249Employment$152,839Philanthropy$60,450Religion$15,000Public Benefit$10,000Community Improvement$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetStruggle of Love Foundation — $475,946 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetMUSLIM FAMILY SERVICES OF COLORADO — $405,303 over 3y, 49% of budgetServiceSource Inc — $98,635 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORDS TO POWER — $60,450 over 2y, 29% of budgetBAYAUD ENTERPRISES INC — $54,204 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHISPANIC AFFAIRS PROJECT — $15,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetVOCES UNIDAS DE LAS MONTANAS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCULTIVANDO — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFour Winds American Indian Council — $5,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Struggle of Love Foundation
  • Who funds MUSLIM FAMILY SERVICES OF COLORADO
  • Who funds ServiceSource Inc
  • Who funds WORDS TO POWER
  • Who funds BAYAUD ENTERPRISES INC
  • Who funds Greater Denver Interfaith Alliance
  • Who funds HISPANIC AFFAIRS PROJECT
  • Who funds VOCES UNIDAS DE LAS MONTANAS
  • Who funds CULTIVANDO
  • Who funds Four Winds American Indian Council

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rose Community FoundationCO19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rose Community Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Latino Community Foundation of Colorado Inc · Caring for Colorado Foundation · The Colorado Trust · The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization La Raza Services Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to La Raza Services Inc?

    Find your warmest path to La Raza Services Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph