How much did LA RAZA SERVICES INC grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 62% of LA RAZA SERVICES INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

educationpolitical

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

2025

denver

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k1 grant · $6k
$50k–250k7 grants · $1.1M

$175,260

Median grant

States reached

$9.3M

Total assets

Largest grants

DENVER ALLIANCE FOR STREET HEALTH RESPONSE DASHR$209,452
FACEIT COMMUNITY INC$191,628
MUSLIM FAMILY SERVICES OF COLORADO$180,610
STRUGGLE OF LOVE FOUNDATION$175,260
DENVER YOUTH PROGRAM GRASP$163,466
SERVICESOURCE INC$98,635
DENVER HEALING GENERATIONS NETWORK$90,000
LILLY GURULE$5,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $534k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.2M · 6 repeat orgs$886k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +308% since the first grant, against +54% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.2M

$528k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+308%

+54%

Still filing today

50%

42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $358k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEmploymentCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitPhilanthropyReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SO
STRUGGLE OF LOVE FOUNDATION
2× · 2023–2025 · $276k · revenue +308%
MF
MUSLIM FAMILY SERVICES OF COLORADO
2× · 2023–2025 · $253k · revenue +299% · 25% of their budget
WT
WORDS TO POWER
2× · 2021–2022 · $60k · revenue +6496% · 29% of their budget

Funded once

CF
COLORADANS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING
one grant, 2023 · $230k
BE
BAYAUD ENTERPRISE
one grant, 2023 · $88k
BE
BAYAUD ENTERPRISES INCgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $54k · revenue +54%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Colorado Latino Leadership Advocacy &

Empowering Latino communities through leadership development, advocacy, and policy research to strengthen Colorado

—

Latino Community Foundation of Colorado

The foundation's mission is to work hand in hand with our diverse communities to create culturally responsive strategies that build influence, equity and opportunity for all latino coloradans. the foundation's vision is a colorado where…

Arts & Culture

Colectiva Legal Del Pueblo

Colectiva Legal del Pueblo is a non-hierarchal collective organization founded for and by undocumented immigrants working to build community leadership and power for migrant justice through legal services, advocacy and education.

Civil Rights

Latina Equity Foundation

To elevate the socio- economic status of the Latina population through initiatives that address education, health and wellness, and economic prosperity.

Civil Rights

Comunidades Unidas

We are dedicated to empowering the Latino community in Utah to recognize and achieve their own potential and become a positive force for change in the larger community.

Human Services

Fuerza Y Union Multiple

Our mission is to build stronger, healthier communities, rich in values and culture. We offer a safe space to access services with mutual and equal respect, working with and for the Latinx community.

Community Improvement

United Liberian Organization of Colorado

The United Liberian Organization Of Colorado ULOC is a non-profit organization with a mission to provide social services to Liberian immigrants and refugees in Colorado. They focus on various areas of support, including education, housing,…

Civil Rights

Convivir Colorado

We support immigrant youth as they find power in their migrant experience and use it to enrich themselves and their Colorado communities.

Youth Development

Latin American Coalition

The Coalition is dedicated to educating Latino immigrant newcomers, celebrating hispanic culture, and advocating for underserved segments of the population. Programs and initiatives include economic development, legal counsel, community…

Human Services

Colorado Organization for Latina

Colorado organization for latina opportunity and reproductive rights (color) is a community-rooted nonprofit organization that works to enable latinx individuals and their families lead safe, healthy, self-determined lives.

Health

Integrated Community

Our mission is to proactively promote and support successful integration of immigrant and local community members in Northwest Colorado through education, intercultural exchange, and collaboration to build a more united community where its…

Human Services

Colorado People's Alliance

Colorado people's alliance (copa) is a racial justice, member-driven organization dedicated to advancing and winning progressive social change locally, statewide and nationally. copa builds power to improve the lives of all coloradans…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Voces Unidas De Las Montanas and the most unlike its peers is Words to Power. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

9/10

Grantees still filing

9/10

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,325,065Human Services$548,877Employment$152,839Philanthropy$60,450Religion$15,000Community Improvement$10,000Public Benefit$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rose Community FoundationCO20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rose Community Foundation · Latino Community Foundation of Colorado · Caring for Colorado Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · The Colorado Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation LA RAZA SERVICES INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: WORDS TO POWER.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 66.0× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 462068506 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on WORDS TO POWER, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 29% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to La Raza Services Inc?

Find your warmest path to La Raza Services Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

LA RAZA SERVICES INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to La Raza Services Inc?

More from the funding graph

LA RAZA SERVICES INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to La Raza Services Inc?

More from the funding graph