Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

La Esperanza de Nuestra Comunidad

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$143k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.

Health$294kPhilanthropy$116kEducation$95kHuman Services$61kRecreation & Sports$47kYouth Development$36kCrime & Legal$25kFood & Nutrition$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$130k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHOC FOUNDATION$100,000
HENDERSON FAMILY FOUNDATION$10,000
MATER DEI HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATIO$10,000
SAM ELIMU CHARITY$5,000
NEWPORT AQUATIC CENTER$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EL MONTE-SOUTH EL MONTE EMERGENCY: $10k → 14%EL MONTE-SOUTH EL MONTE EMERGENCY RESOURCES ASSOCIATION: $3k → 14%NATIONAL CHARITY LEAGUE INC ORANGEVILLA PARK CHAPTER: $5k → 10%NATIONAL CHARITY LEAGUE INC ORANGEV: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
WI
MA
NV
IN
PA
CT
CA
UT
VA
MD

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$380k · 14 repeat orgs$313k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
32

Total granted

$380k
$285k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+28%

Still filing today

86%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CHOC FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $150k · revenue +10%
  • NA
    NEWPORT AQUATIC CENTER
    3× · 2023–2025 · $25k · revenue +31%
  • HM
    HAILEY MAYZ FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $18k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • GF
    GENERATIONS FOR GOOD INC
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · 100% of their budget
  • YA
    YOUTH AND FAMILY CLUB OF POMONA
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • PA
    PULMONARY AND IMMUNOLOGY RESEARCH
    one grant, 2023 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chu Legacy Foundation
Philanthropy
2
The Curley Family Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Cal Med Foundation
Education
4
Atherton Family Foundation
—
5
The Craig Snider Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Curtis Lemair Legacy Foundation
Recreation & Sports
7
Mlb-Mlbpa Youth Development Foundation
Recreation & Sports
8
The Laugeni Family Foundation
Philanthropy
9
The Curtis Foundation
—
10
The Culleystrong Foundation
Education
11
The Austin Denton Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Brian Littleton Foundation
Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hailey Mayz Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Leo Adler Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealthcare Systems and Foun…Family Philanthropic Founda…Veterans Support ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsSchool Parent-Teacher Organ…Supportive Housing ProgramsIndependent and Charter Sch…Service Club Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%7%<5yr16%20%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr17%15%20–35yr10%7%35–55yr12%32%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%10%<5yr16%16%5–10yr20%16%10–20yr17%5%20–35yr10%6%35–55yr12%47%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/42
the rest of the field
15%
11,335/75,673

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
25/37
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHOC FOUNDATION — $150,000 · HealthCHOC FOUNDATIONEmanate Health Foundation — $60,000 · HealthEmanate Health FoundationKURE IT INC — $40,000 · HealthKURE IT INCHAILEY MAYZ FOUNDATION INC — $17,500 · HealthHAILEY MAYZ FOUNDATION INC+6 more — $19,500 · Health+6 moreMATER DEI HIGH SCHOOL ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF ORANGE — $35,000 · OtherMATER DEI HIGH SCHOOL ROMAN C…YOUTH AND FAMILY CLUB OF POMONA — $25,000 · OtherYOUTH AND FAMILY CLUB OF POMO…PULMONARY AND IMMUNOLOGY RESEARCH — $25,000 · OtherPULMONARY AND IMMUNOLOGY RESE…EL MONTE POLICE OFFICERS FOUNDATION — $25,000 · OtherEL MONTE POLICE OFFICERS FOUN…EL MONTE PROMISE FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATIO — $10,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF THE ARTS SGV — $10,000 · Other+15 more — $51,600 · Other+15 moreGENERATIONS FOR GOOD INC — $50,000 · PhilanthropyGENERATIONS FOR GOOD …IRWINDALE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $35,000 · PhilanthropyIRWINDALE COMMUNITY F…OATH TO COUNTRY FOUNDATION — $21,000 · PhilanthropyOATH TO COUNTRY FOUND…ROD DEDEAUX FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyROD DEDEAUX FOUNDATIO…THE HENDERSON FAMILY FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE HENDERSON FAMILY …Leo Adler Trust — $10,000 · PhilanthropyLeo Adler TrustCALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF THE ARTS SAN GABRIEL VALLEY — $10,000 · EducationAZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · EducationLA VERNE-SAN DIMAS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $7,500 · EducationSAM ELIMU CHARITY — $5,000 · EducationLEGACY ACADEMY INC — $5,000 · EducationIrwindale Education Fund — $5,000 · EducationUTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 · EducationNEWPORT AQUATIC CENTER — $25,000 · Recreation & SportsLITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC — $2,000 · Recreation & SportsCLAREMONT FAST PITCH — $1,500 · Recreation & SportsEco Urban Gardens — $20,000 · Food & NutritionEL MONTE-SOUTH EL MONTE EMERGENCY RESOURCES ASSOCIATION — $12,500 · Human ServicesNATIONAL CHARITY LEAGUE INC ORANGE VILLA PARK CHAPTER — $6,000 · Human Services
Health$287,000Other$191,600Philanthropy$136,000Education$46,500Recreation & Sports$28,500Food & Nutrition$20,000Human Services$18,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHOC FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEmanate Health Foundation — $60,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetGENERATIONS FOR GOOD INC — $50,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetKURE IT INC — $40,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetIRWINDALE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $35,000 over 2y, 9.9% of budgetNEWPORT AQUATIC CENTER — $25,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetOATH TO COUNTRY FOUNDATION — $21,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetEco Urban Gardens — $20,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetHAILEY MAYZ FOUNDATION INC — $17,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetEL MONTE-SOUTH EL MONTE EMERGENCY RESOURCES ASSOCIATION — $12,500 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetTHE HENDERSON FAMILY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF THE ARTS SAN GABRIEL VALLEY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLeo Adler Trust — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLA VERNE-SAN DIMAS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetORANGE COUNTY COUNCIL 039 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL CHARITY LEAGUE INC ORANGE VILLA PARK CHAPTER — $6,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSAVE THE HEARTBEAT — $5,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetSAM ELIMU CHARITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLEGACY ACADEMY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSTUDENTS RUN AMERICA — $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDON BOSCO TECHNICAL INSTITUTE — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL OLDTIME FIDDLERS INC — $4,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetLITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC — $2,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetPROJECT CORNERSTONE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTYLER ROBINSON FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC — $2,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCLAREMONT FAST PITCH — $1,500 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetMcKinley Children's Center Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIEDREICH'S ATAXIA RESEARCH ALLIANCE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAURA MOORE CUNNINGHAM FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Communi…Henry L Guenther Foun…The Ahmanson Foundati…Sempra FoundationEnterprise Holdings F…The Bank of America C…The Blackbaud Giving …Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Charities Aid Foundat…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…
Orange County Community FoundationCA13.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Henry L Guenther Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization La Esperanza de Nuestra Comunidad funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to La Esperanza de Nuestra Comunidad?

    Find your warmest path to La Esperanza de Nuestra Comunidad through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home