Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

L Franklin Purnell Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$29k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Housing & Shelter$108kEducation$90kHealth$53kHuman Services$16kReligion$5kArts & Culture$3kYouth Development$2kRecreation & Sports$500
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$554k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOR WIC FOUNDATION$14,000
DIAKONIA INC$11,000
WORCESTER COUNTY GOLD$2,000
COASTAL HOSPICE$1,000
HENRY HOTEL FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $149k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 13% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COASTAL HOSPICE: $2k → 8%COASTAL HOSPICE: $1k → 8%COASTAL HOSPICE: $8k → 13%COASTAL HOSPICE: $1k → 8%COASTAL HOSPICE: $5k → 13%COASTAL HOSPICE: $1k → 8%COASTAL HOSPICE: $5k → 13%COASTAL HOSPICE: $2k → 13%DIAKONIA INC: $13k → 8%DIAKONIA INC: $13k → 8%DIAKONIA INC: $13k → 8%DIAKONIA INC: $12k → 8%DIAKONIA INC: $12k → 8%DIAKONIA INC: $12k → 8%DIAKONIA INC: $12k → 8%DIAKONIA INC: $11k → 8%DIAKONIA INC: $10k → 8%WORCESTER COUNTY GOLD: $3k → 8%WORCESTER COUNTY GOLD: $3k → 8%WORCESTER COUNTY GOLD: $2k → 8%WORCESTER COUNTY GOLD: $2k → 8%WORCESTER COUNTY GOLD: $2k → 8%WORCESTER COUNTY GOLD: $1k → 8%WORCESTER COUNTY GOLD: $1k → 8%WORCESTER COUNTY GOLD: $1k → 8%WORCESTER COUNTY GOLD: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$267k · 9 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
9

Total granted

$267k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+73%

Still filing today

44%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DI
    DIAKONIA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $108k · revenue +148%
  • CH
    COASTAL HOSPICE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue +28%
  • WC
    WORCESTER COUNTY GOLD INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • SP
    ST PAULS EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • WC
    WORCESTER COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL INC
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue -17%
  • SU
    STEVENSON UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ocean City Development Corporation

The ocean city development corporation is dedicated to the revitalization of the downtown area of ocean city, maryland. programs are designed by the organization to formulate and implement long range development strategies for commercial,…

Arts & Culture
2
Coastal Hospice Inc

Provide quality compassionate holistic care to patients at home.

Human Services
3
Hospice Care Corporation D/B/a West Virginia Caring

To improve care for those facing life-limiting illness through direct support of patients and their families, public education and public advocacy.

4
Hospice of Washington County Inc

To work together with our interdisciplinary team to provide quality, coordinated, comprehensive patient and family-centered care that addresses the physical, spiritual, emotional and practical needs of our patients. we encourage our…

5
Hospice of Southern West Virginia Inc

To serve the needs of individuals suffering from life-limiting illness as well as to serve the individuals caring for them. to place emphasis on comfort and quality of life while fulfilling the physical, psychological, social and spiritual…

6
Hospice of Pamlico County Inc

To provide hospice and bereavement care to patients and their families in pamlico and portions of beaufort and craven counties, nc

7
Keystone Hospice

Providing comprehensive home-based and facility based hospice care to children and adults with life limiting and life threatening illnesses in southeastern pennsylvania. in addition, keystone hospice provides residential care through…

Human Services
8
Hospice of Rockingham County Inc

Provide medical and other suport services to patients and their families.

9
Hospice of Washington County Inc

To make quality hospice care available to persons with life threatening illnesses, their families, and those affected by death and dying in our community; to advocate effectively for patient comfort, dignity, and choice; and to be…

Human Services
10
Howard County Chamber of Commerce

To represent the business community of howard county, maryland

11
Webster Memorial Hospital Inc

The mission of webster memorial hospital is to provide excellent, high quality care in a compassionate and cost-effective manner.

Health
12
Hospice

To provide care and support for the terminally ill.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Worcester County Gold Inc and the most unlike its peers is Berlin Little League Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DIAKONIA INC — $108,000 · Human ServicesDIAKONIA INCCOASTAL HOSPICE — $25,000 · Human ServicesCOASTAL HOSPICEWORCESTER COUNTY GOLD INC — $16,000 · Human ServicesWORCESTER COUNTY GOLD INCWOR WIC FOUNDATION — $82,000 · OtherWOR WIC FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWOR-WIC COMMUNITY COLLEGE INC — $8,000 · OtherWOR-WIC COMMUNITY COLLEGE INCSHIRLEY GRACE PREGNANCY CENTER — $8,000 · OtherSHIRLEY GRACE PREGNANCY CENTER+9 more — $10,500 · Other+9 moreATLANTIC GENERAL HOSPITAL — $3,000 · HealthHOPE4RECOVERY INC — $1,000 · HealthOCEAN CITY MUSEUM SOCIETY INC — $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$149,000Other$123,500Health$4,000Arts & Culture$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDIAKONIA INC — $108,000 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetCOASTAL HOSPICE — $25,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWORCESTER COUNTY GOLD INC — $16,000 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetATLANTIC GENERAL HOSPITAL — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE4RECOVERY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetOCEAN CITY MUSEUM SOCIETY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBERLIN LITTLE LEAGUE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DIAKONIA INC
  • Who funds COASTAL HOSPICE
  • Who funds WORCESTER COUNTY GOLD INC
  • Who funds ATLANTIC GENERAL HOSPITAL
  • Who funds WORCESTER COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds HOPE4RECOVERY INC
  • Who funds OCEAN CITY MUSEUM SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds BERLIN LITTLE LEAGUE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Eastern ShorMD24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Eastern Shor · Humphreys Foundation Inc · Joan W Jenkins Foundation Inc · Franklin P and Arthur W Perdue Foundation Inc · Wilde Charitable Foundation · Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks Bpoe 2645 · Baker-Dickerson Family Foundation · Synepuxent Post No 166 the American Legion Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization L Franklin Purnell Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 89%
  • Worcester County Arts Council Inc89% of income from government
  • Diakonia Inc51% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to L Franklin Purnell Foundation?

Find your warmest path to L Franklin Purnell Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph