Skip to content

Maryland · Public charity

Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks Bpoe 2645

Promoting the ideals of the bpo elks

$242k
Granted FY2026(still arriving)
8
Itemized grants FY2026
9
Organizations funded FY2025
22%
First-time grantees FY2025
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2026
$74k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2026
$6,500
Largest grant, FY2026
$21,285
Organizations funded a year
2 to 10
FY2018 to FY2025
States reached, FY2026
3
Total assets, FY2026
$2.6M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2025, 22% of the organizations Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks Bpoe 2645 funded were first-time grantees, receiving 18% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2026still arriving8$74k13%
FY20259$78k22%
FY202410$94k60%
FY20237$49k57%
FY20222$16k0%
FY20202$14k0%
FY20192$16k0%
FY20183$19k100%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$88kPhilanthropy$65kHousing & Shelter$44kHuman Services$43kFood & Nutrition$21kYouth Development$14kRecreation & Sports$13kEducation$6k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2026, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 16 grantees
All grantees of Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks Bpoe 2645 by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Elks National Foundation Inc$86,22980%
Coastal Hospice$49,50060%
Diakonia Inc$33,50031%
Believe in Tomorrow National Children's Foundation$30,90040%
Worcester County Gold Inc$26,00033%
Maryland Delaware and District of Columbia Elks Assoc$22,52021%
William J Jernick Memorial Fund Inc$21,776312%
The Maryland Food Bank Inc$20,50030%
Chesapeake Housing Mission Inc$17,45031%
Justin W Jennings Foundation Inc$16,0002n/a
Ocean City-Berlin Optimist Youth Foundation Inc$7,500122%
Salvation Army National Corp$7,0001n/a
Worcester Youth and Family Counseling Services Inc$6,00011%
Atlantic General Hospital$6,00010%
Town of Ocean City$5,5001n/a
Mac Incorporated$5,5001n/a

Plus 1 recipient with no EIN on record ($6k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks Bpoe 2645 supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetElks National Foundation Inc: $86,229 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCoastal Hospice: $49,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDiakonia Inc: $33,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBelieve in Tomorrow National Children's Foundation: $30,900 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetWorcester County Gold Inc: $26,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetMaryland Delaware and District of Columbia Elks Assoc: $22,520 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetWilliam J Jernick Memorial Fund Inc: $21,776 over 3y, 12% of budgetThe Maryland Food Bank Inc: $20,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChesapeake Housing Mission Inc: $17,450 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetOcean City-Berlin Optimist Youth Foundation Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 22% of budgetWorcester Youth and Family Counseling Services Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAtlantic General Hospital: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 12.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Eastern ShorMD22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Eastern Shor · Synepuxent Post No 166 the American Legion Inc · Humphreys Foundation Inc · Franklin P and Arthur W Perdue Foundation Inc · United Way of the Lower Eastern Shore Inc · Wilde Charitable Foundation · L Franklin Purnell Foundation · Baker-Dickerson Family Foundation · Jack Burbage Foundation Inc · The Carl M Freeman Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks Bpoe 2645 with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks Bpoe 2645?

Find your warmest path to Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks Bpoe 2645 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks Bpoe 2645

How much does Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks Bpoe 2645 give?
Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks Bpoe 2645 reported 8 itemized grants totaling $73,785, out of $242,387 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2026 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 10 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2025.
What does Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks Bpoe 2645 fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2026, its largest causes are Health (30%), Philanthropy (22%), Housing & Shelter (15%).
Who are Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks Bpoe 2645's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2026: Elks National Foundation Inc ($86k), Coastal Hospice ($50k), Diakonia Inc ($34k).
Does Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks Bpoe 2645 fund new organizations?
In FY2025, 22% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks Bpoe 2645?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Community Foundation of the Eastern Shor, Synepuxent Post No 166 the American Legion Inc, Humphreys Foundation Inc.
Where is Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks Bpoe 2645 based?
Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks Bpoe 2645 is based in MD.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks Bpoe 2645’s filings →

More from the funding graph