Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kyle Lake Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$218kReligion$76kHealth$33kEmployment$20kRecreation & Sports$7kCrime & Legal$5kHuman Services$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$188k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$2,781
LeTourneau University$2,500
BAYLOR UNIVERSITY$2,500
Hill College$2,500
East Texas Baptist University$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BRECKENRIDGE VILLAGE OF TYLER: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
OR
CA
AR
SC
OK
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 65% of Kyle Lake Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Kyle Lake Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$269k · 13 repeat orgs$107k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
38

Total granted

$269k
$99k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+30%

Still filing today

31%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionCrime & LegalHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2018–2025 · $114k · revenue +53%
  • DB
    DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2019–2021 · $8k · revenue +33%
  • TM
    The Master's University and Seminary
    2× · 2018–2022 · $5k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • TB
    TEXAS BAPTIST MISSION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Howard Payne University

Howard payne university is a christ-centered academic community dedicated to excellence by developing and equipping the whole person for intellectual inquiry, personal and professional integrity, and service to god and humanity.

Education
2
Taylor University

The mission of Taylor University is to develop servant-leaders marked with a passion to minister Christ's redemptive love, grace, and truth to a world in need.

Education
3
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
4
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
5
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
6
Asbury Theological Seminary

Asbury Theological Seminary is a community called to prepare theologically educated, sanctified, Spirit-filled men and women to evangelize and to spread scriptural holiness throughout the world through the love of Jesus Christ, in the…

Education
7
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
8
California Baptist University

A private institution of higher education, offering both undergraduate and graduate courses to students.

Education
9
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
10
Belhaven University

Belhaven university prepares students academically and spiritually to serve jesus christ in their careers, in human relationships, and in the world of ideas.

Education
11
Reformed University Inc

Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.

Education
12
The King's University

The King's University integrates Biblical education and practical ministry to shape Spirit-formed individuals who follow Jesus, serve His Church, and are sent to impact the world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wheaton College; the most unlike its peers is Pastors Hope Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GEORGE W TRUETT THEOLOGICAL SEMINAR: $48,716 · OtherGEORGE W TRUETT THEOLOGICAL SEMINARTEXAS AM UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · OtherTEXAS AM UNIVERSITYCHRISTIAN WOMENS JOB CORPS: $20,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN WOMENS JOB CORPSNORTHEAST TEXAS FELLOWSHIP OF CHRIS: $13,309 · OtherNORTHEAST TEXAS FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTEXAS BAPTIST MISSION FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $8,184 · OtherTEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY: $7,500 · Other+32 more: $86,456 · Other+32 moreBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $113,587 · EducationBAYLOR UNIVERSITYDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $7,500 · EducationThe Master's University and Seminary: $5,000 · EducationEAST TEXAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · Education+7 more: $17,191 · Education+7 moreFrontier Camp Inc: $2,134 · ReligionPASTORS HOPE NETWORK: $1,000 · ReligionNEW CREATION FOUNDATION INC: $3,002 · HealthTAPKARD INC: $2,986 · Crime & LegalBreckenridge Village: $1,507 · Human Services
Other$219,165Education$148,278Religion$3,134Health$3,002Crime & Legal$2,986Human Services$1,507

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $113,587 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Master's University and Seminary: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEAST TEXAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BROOK HILL SCHOOL INC: $3,184 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW CREATION FOUNDATION INC: $3,002 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTAPKARD INC: $2,986 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLeTourneau University: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUACHITA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWheaton College: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFrontier Camp Inc: $2,134 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBreckenridge Village: $1,507 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetValor Preparatory Academy: $1,507 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPASTORS HOPE NETWORK: $1,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds The Master's University and Seminary ↗
  • Who funds EAST TEXAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE BROOK HILL SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW CREATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TAPKARD INC ↗
  • Who funds LeTourneau University ↗
  • Who funds OUACHITA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds William Marsh Rice University ↗
  • Who funds Wheaton College ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Texas Communities FoundationTX21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Texas Communities Foundation · Folds of Honor Foundation · Jack and Charlotte Owen Education Scholarship · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kyle Lake Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kyle Lake Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kyle Lake Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Kyle Lake Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kyle Lake’s filings →

    More from the funding graph