Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kuykendall Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$160k
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$171kReligion$155kHealth$126kFood & Nutrition$97kHousing & Shelter$67kPhilanthropy$57kArts & Culture$35kRecreation & Sports$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k36 grants · $136k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH$13,500
REFUGE SERVICES INC$10,500
HOSPICE OF THE SOUTH PLAINS$7,000
LUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC$7,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF LUBBOCK INC$6,500
LUBBOCK AREA UNITED WAY$6,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK$6,000
TEXAS BOYS RANCH$5,500
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$5,000
ARRINGTON CANCER CENTER$5,000
CASA OF THE SOUTH PLAINS INC$4,500
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION$4,000
YWCA OF LUBBOCK$4,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS TEXAS$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $115k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%HIGH POINT VILLAGE: $4k → 17%HIGH POINT VILLAGE: $3k → 17%HIGH POINT VILLAGE: $2k → 17%HIGH POINT VILLAGE: $2k → 17%REFUGE SERVICES INC: $17k → 17%REFUGE SERVICES INC: $11k → 17%REFUGE SERVICES INC: $10k → 17%REFUGE SERVICES INC: $9k → 17%REFUGE SERVICES INC: $9k → 17%REFUGE SERVICES INC: $1k → 17%HOSPICE OF LUBBOCK: $7k → 17%HOSPICE OF LUBBOCK: $7k → 17%HOSPICE OF LUBBOCK: $7k → 17%HOSPICE OF LUBBOCK: $7k → 17%HOSPICE OF LUBBOCK: $7k → 17%LUBBOCK IMPACT: $2k → 17%LUBBOCK IMPACT: $2k → 17%CHILDRENS HOME OF LUBBOCK: $4k → 17%CHILDRENS HOME OF LUBBOCK: $3k → 17%CHILDRENS HOME OF LUBBOCK: $1k → 17%CHILDRENS HOME OF LUBBOCK: $1k → 17%CHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$815k · 40 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

40 repeat relationships: 36 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
4

Total granted

$815k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
-1%

Still filing today

48%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyHealthArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $36k · revenue +10%
  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE OF LUBBOCK INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $35k · revenue +310%
  • HO
    HOSPICE OF LUBBOCK INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $35k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • CL
    CREATIVE LEARNING CENTER PRE-SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lubbock Family Outreach Center Inc Dba Family Guidance & Outreach Center

The Family Guidance & Outreach Center of Lubbock is dedicated to the prevention of child abuse and neglect and supporting, mentoring, and educating parents.

Human Services
2
Ywca of Lubbock Legacy Fund Inc

The ywca of lubbock legacy fund inc. is dedicated to meeting the needs of the ywca of lubbock in supporting the community through its mission of eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for…

Philanthropy
3
Family Legal Services of the South Plains

The family legal services of the south plains works to provide low income clients of the south plains with first-rate legal assistance, advocacy, and quality counsel in matters of family and elder law at free and/or reduced cost.

Crime & Legal
4
Goodwill Industries of Lubbock Contract Services Inc

Goodwill is a local nonprofit helping people overcome challenges, build skills, find jobs and grow careers.

Employment
5
Lone Star Casa Inc

Lone Star CASA elevates the voices of children in Kaufman and Rockwall County who have experienced abuse and neglect by providing trained volunteer advocates to work alongside children and families so they can achieve safety and stability…

Civil Rights
6
Lubbock Rape Crisis Center

To provide victims of sexual assault in the lubbock county and surrounding area with free, confidential crisis advocacy, assistance, and support, and to promote public awareness of the realities of sexual victimization and strive toward…

Health
7
Lubbock Chamber of Commerce

The lubbock chamber of commerce provides promotion of business and community growth and development as well as preserving the competitive business enterprise system in the lubbock and surrounding area.

—
8
Goodwill Industries of Lubbock Inc

Goodwill is a local nonprofit helping people overcome challenges, build skills, find jobs and grow careers.

Employment
9
Lubbock Christian School

Lubbock christian school is dedicated to providing a quality environment in which each student will grow in wisdom and stature and in favor with god and man. lcs strives for excellence spiritually, personally, and professionally among…

Education
10
Lubbock Association of Realtors Inc

Trade Organization of Real Estate Professionals. Promoting the common interest of the Real Estate industry in Lubbock and the surrounding area. To help promote improvement of business conditions in this area.

—
11
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Lubbock Inc

To create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

—
12
Womens Sober House of Lufkin Inc

The Mantooth House is a Recovery Residence for Chemically Dependent adult women who have successfully completed primary treatment and are in early, but active recovery. We exist to provide quality recovery housing and bridge the gap…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lubbock Area United Way Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ronald McDONALD House Charities of Greater North Texas Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $81,000 · OtherFIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $36,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientARRINGTON CANCER CENTER: $30,000 · OtherARRINGTON CANCER CENTERYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF LUBBOCK: $24,000 · OtherBREEDLOVE DEHYDRATION FOODS: $24,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF LUBBOCK INC: $20,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION: $19,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS: $18,000 · OtherOPEN DOOR: $17,000 · OtherTHE DREAM CENTER: $17,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC: $23,000 · OtherCASA OF THE SOUTH PLAINS INC: $21,500 · Other+18 more: $123,000 · Other+18 moreREFUGE SERVICES INC: $55,000 · Human ServicesREFUGE SERVICES INCHOSPICE OF LUBBOCK INC: $34,500 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF LUBBOCK IN…TEXAS GIRLS AND BOYS RANCH: $28,000 · Human ServicesTEXAS GIRLS AND BOYS …WOMEN'S PROTECTIVE SERVICES: $18,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S PROTECTIVE SE…HIGH POINT VILLAGE INC: $11,000 · Human ServicesHIGH POINT VILLAGE IN…CHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK AND FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOME OF LU…+1 more: $4,000 · Human ServicesLUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $37,000 · Food & NutritionLUBBOCK M…SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC: $36,000 · Food & NutritionSOUTH PLA…LUBBOCK AREA UNITED WAY INC: $31,000 · PhilanthropyRONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC: $26,000 · PhilanthropyFAMILY PROMISE OF LUBBOCK INC: $35,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF LUBBOCK INC: $16,500 · HealthALAMO AREA RAPE CRISIS CENTER: $12,000 · HealthLUBBOCK SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $12,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION: $12,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$453,500Human Services$160,500Food & Nutrition$73,000Philanthropy$57,000Housing & Shelter$35,000Health$28,500Arts & Culture$24,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetREFUGE SERVICES INC: $55,000 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetLUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $37,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC: $36,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF LUBBOCK INC: $35,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetHOSPICE OF LUBBOCK INC: $34,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLUBBOCK AREA UNITED WAY INC: $31,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS GIRLS AND BOYS RANCH: $28,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC: $26,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF LUBBOCK: $24,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC: $23,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF THE SOUTH PLAINS INC: $21,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetWOMEN'S PROTECTIVE SERVICES: $18,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF LUBBOCK INC: $16,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLUBBOCK SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $12,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMUSEUM OF TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION: $12,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetALAMO AREA RAPE CRISIS CENTER: $12,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHIGH POINT VILLAGE INC: $11,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK AND FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLUBBOCK IMPACT INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF LUBBOCK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds REFUGE SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds LUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF LUBBOCK INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF LUBBOCK INC ↗
  • Who funds LUBBOCK AREA UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS GIRLS AND BOYS RANCH ↗
  • Who funds RONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF LUBBOCK ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF THE SOUTH PLAINS INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S PROTECTIVE SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF LUBBOCK INC ↗
  • Who funds LUBBOCK SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds Alcoholic Recovery Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ALAMO AREA RAPE CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HIGH POINT VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK AND FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Diekemper Family Foundation IncTX34.8× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Diekemper Family Foundation Inc · Ch Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of West Texas · Texas Instruments Foundation · South Plains Foundation · The Evelyn M Davies Foundation Trust · Helen Jones Foundation Inc · HDS Foundation · Mary L Livermore Foundation · Rc Johnson Jr Foundation Inc · Ershel Franklin Charitable Trust · International Assoc of Lions Clubs

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kuykendall Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kuykendall Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kuykendall’s filings →

    More from the funding graph