Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kurt B Karmin Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$81k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$292kEducation$109kHealth$74kArts & Culture$68kHuman Services$46kReligion$27kRecreation & Sports$13kCommunity Improvement$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$450
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH UNITED FUND$50,000
GI RESEARCH FOUNDATION$25,000
US HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO BUSINESS$500
WTTW$450
AUDUBON$250
NSCI$100
NSCI$100
CHICAGO HTG SOCIETY$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$710k · 21 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
15

Total granted

$710k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+39%

Still filing today

57%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $800 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEducationPhilanthropyEnvironmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    8× · 2017–2025 · $341k · revenue +13%
  • CS
    Chicago Symphony Orchestra
    7× · 2017–2023 · $34k · revenue +58%
  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
    5× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • EW
    EVANSTON WILMETTE GOLF ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $13k
  • NS
    NORTH SHORE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +6%
  • CO
    CITY OF HOPE
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
2
National Gallery of Art

The National Gallery of Art serves the nation by welcoming all people to explore and experience art, creativity, and our shared humanity.

Arts & Culture
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Computer History Museum

Chm decodes technology - its computing past, digital present, and future impact on humanity.

Arts & Culture
5
The Adler Planetarium

The adler planetarium ('adler') is a not-for-profit cultural institution whose mission is to connect people to the universe and each other under the sky we all share. it aspires to be the world's premier center for engaging in astronomy…

Arts & Culture
6
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
7
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
8
Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

Arts & Culture
9
Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc

The mission of the Boston Symphony Orchestra (BSO) is to foster and maintain an organization dedicated to making music consonant with the highest aspirations of the musical art, creating performances and providing educational and training…

Arts & Culture
10
National September 11 Memorial and Museum At the World Trade Center

The national september 11 memorial & museum at the world trade center bears solemn witness to the terrorist attacks of september 11, 2001, and february 26, 1993. located at a site made sacred through loss, the memorial & museum remembers…

Arts & Culture
11
Grant Park Orchestral Association

(see schedule o)

Arts & Culture
12
Endeavor Health Clinical Operations

Endeavor Health Clinical Operations follows the mission of Endeavor Health to "help everyone in our communities be their best."

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Horticultural Society; the most unlike its peers is Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
17/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $341,050 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGOIndividual grant recipient: $116,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ST LOUIS: $100,000 · OtherWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ST LOUISSELF HELP HOME: $45,050 · OtherSELF HELP HOMENORTH SHORE CONGREGATION ISRAEL: $27,235 · OtherNORTH SHORE CONGREGATION ISRAELEVANSTON WILMETTE GOLF ASSOCIATION: $12,500 · Other+22 more: $29,204 · Other+22 moreChicago Symphony Orchestra: $34,450 · Arts & CultureChicago S…The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $25,150 · Arts & CultureThe Unite…WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $2,870 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $380 · Arts & CultureTOOLS FOR TOMORROW INC: $950 · EducationTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $405 · EducationEisenhower Medical Center: $1,050 · HealthRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $50 · HealthWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $500 · Human ServicesCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $380 · Environment
Philanthropy$341,050Other$329,989Arts & Culture$62,850Education$1,355Health$1,100Human Services$500Environment$380

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $341,050 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra: $34,450 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $25,150 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $2,870 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEisenhower Medical Center: $1,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTOOLS FOR TOMORROW INC: $950 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $654 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $405 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $380 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE THRESHOLDS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLevy Senior Center Foundation Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $80 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Symphony Orchestra ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds NORTH SHORE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds TOOLS FOR TOMORROW INC ↗
  • Who funds MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds Music Theatre Works Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE THRESHOLDS ↗
  • Who funds Levy Senior Center Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kurt B Karmin Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kurt B Karmin Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kurt B Karmin Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Kurt B Karmin Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kurt B Karmin Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph