Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Kurt B Karmin Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$67k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$292kEducation$109kHealth$74kArts & Culture$68kHuman Services$46kReligion$27kRecreation & Sports$13kCommunity Improvement$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $2k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $65k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH UNITED FUND$45,000
GI RESEARCH FOUNDATION$20,000
GI RESEARCH FOUNDATION$1,000
WTTW$425
NSCI$250
NSCI$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$629k · 21 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
15

Total granted

$629k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+39%

Still filing today

57%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthEducationPhilanthropyEnvironmentInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    7× · 2017–2024 · $291k · revenue +13%
  • CS
    Chicago Symphony Orchestra
    7× · 2017–2023 · $34k · revenue +58%
  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
    4× · 2017–2022 · $20k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • EW
    EVANSTON WILMETTE GOLF ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $13k
  • NS
    NORTH SHORE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +6%
  • CO
    CITY OF HOPE
    one grant, 2019 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
2
Computer History Museum

Chm decodes technology - its computing past, digital present, and future impact on humanity.

Arts & Culture
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
5
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
6
The Adler Planetarium

The adler planetarium ('adler') is a not-for-profit cultural institution whose mission is to connect people to the universe and each other under the sky we all share. it aspires to be the world's premier center for engaging in astronomy…

Arts & Culture
7
Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

Arts & Culture
8
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
9
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
10
National September 11 Memorial and Museum At the World Trade Center

The national september 11 memorial & museum at the world trade center bears solemn witness to the terrorist attacks of september 11, 2001, and february 26, 1993. located at a site made sacred through loss, the memorial & museum remembers…

Arts & Culture
11
University of Chicago

The mission of the university of chicago has been to sustain at the highest level of excellence, the communication of knowledge, the creation of knowledge and the fostering of a dynamic community of scholars and students.

Education
12
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Horticultural Society and the most unlike its peers is Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
17/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ST LOUIS — $100,000 · OtherWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ST LOUISIndividual grant recipient — $91,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSELF HELP HOME — $45,050 · OtherSELF HELP HOMENORTH SHORE CONGREGATION ISRAEL — $27,235 · OtherNORTH SHORE CONGREGATION ISRAELEVANSTON WILMETTE GOLF ASSOCIATION — $12,500 · OtherRAVINIA — $10,150 · Other+18 more — $18,054 · Other+18 moreJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $291,050 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGOChicago Symphony Orchestra — $34,450 · Arts & CultureChicago S…The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $20,150 · Arts & CultureThe Unite…WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC — $2,420 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $380 · Arts & CultureTOOLS FOR TOMORROW INC — $950 · EducationTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO — $405 · EducationEisenhower Medical Center — $1,050 · HealthRehabilitation Institute of Chicago — $50 · HealthWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $500 · Human ServicesCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY — $380 · Environment
Other$303,989Philanthropy$291,050Arts & Culture$57,400Education$1,355Health$1,100Human Services$500Environment$380

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $291,050 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra — $34,450 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $20,150 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC — $2,420 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEisenhower Medical Center — $1,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTOOLS FOR TOMORROW INC — $950 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger — $654 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO — $405 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY — $380 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLevy Senior Center Foundation Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE THRESHOLDS — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $80 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRehabilitation Institute of Chicago — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
  • Who funds Chicago Symphony Orchestra
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
  • Who funds NORTH SHORE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL
  • Who funds WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC
  • Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center
  • Who funds TOOLS FOR TOMORROW INC
  • Who funds MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO
  • Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
  • Who funds Music Theatre Works Inc
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds Levy Senior Center Foundation Inc
  • Who funds THE THRESHOLDS
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
  • Who funds Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kurt B Karmin Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kurt B Karmin Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Kurt B Karmin Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph