How much did KRUSEN FAMILY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION CORP grant in FY2024?

Education$101kArts & Culture$51kEnvironment$13kRecreation & Sports$13kPhilanthropy$11kInternational$5kHuman Services$3kYouth Development$2kHealth$250Other$75k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

student financialfinancial aidscholarships studentarchaeological

2020

charactercovid reliefcoursehealtharchaeologicaleducationwildlife

2021

studentyouthcare

2022

middlesexcreatingeducationhopewildlife corridorboca grandeyouth

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k18 grants · $24k
$10k–50k1 grant · $10k

$1,000

Median grant

States reached

$950k

Total assets

Largest grants

TAMPA BAY MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION$10,000
PRINCETONIONS FOR FREE SPEECH$3,000
ST JOHN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH TAMPA$3,000
FRIENDS OF BOCA GRANDE COMMUNITY CENTER$2,500
STRATFORD HALL$2,500
TAMPA METROPOLITAN AREA YMCA$2,500
FRESH AIR FUND$2,500
THE GASPARILLA ISLAND CONSERVATION AND IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION INC$2,000
THE ISLAND SCHOOL$1,000
CHI CHI RODRIGUEZ YOUTH FOUNDATION INC$1,000
BOCA GRANDE WOMEN'S CLUB$1,000
DABO'S ALL IN TEAM FOUNDATION$1,000
FRAMEWORKS OF TAMPA BAY$750
INSTRUMENTS OF CHANGE$500
THE JF LIBRARY FOUNDATION$100

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of KRUSEN FAMILY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION CORP’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 48% of the giving stays in FL; read by stated purpose it is 42% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

KRUSEN FAMILY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION CORPlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$223k · 25 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$223k

$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%

+72%

Still filing today

68%

52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyEnvironmentHealthRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

AR
AUCILLA RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC
3× · 2017–2020 · $31k · revenue +32%
THE FRESH AIR FUND
3× · 2020–2024 · $13k · revenue +34%
TG
THE GASPARILLA ISLAND CONSERVATION AND IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION INC
4× · 2018–2024 · $11k · revenue +66%

Funded once

YO
YMCA OF GREATER RICHMOND
one grant, 2020 · $6k
TJ
THE JAMESTOWN FOUNDATION
one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -33%
BG
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO RICHMOND
one grant, 2020 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

University of Florida Alumni

Education and research and shaping a better future for florida, the nation and the world," as determined by the university of florida board of trustees. the association strengthens the gator nation by involving and engaging its alumni,…

Education

Florida Southern College

Private united methodist affiliated college that is committed to educational excellence.

Education

The Collegiate School

See schedule o to create a diverse and inclusive community of learners committed to a challenging and supportive educational experience that will foster the intellectual, moral, emotional, and physical development of each student.

Education

University of Florida

To assist the university of florida in funding of research & development through grants & contractual arrangements & in the commercialization of intellectual properties, which include inventions, discoveries, processes, & work products.

Education

The Florida State University Foundation

The florida state university foundation enhances the academic mission and vision of florida state university through its organized fundraising activities and funds management. the fsu foundation accomplishes its mission by fostering…

Education

Florida Atlantic University Foundation

To support florida atlantic university.

Education

Florida State University Alumni

To build a network of alumni and friends and sustain meaningful relationships on behalf of florida state university. this vision is accomplished through engaging alumni and friends via programs and services that foster pride and enhance a…

Education

Florida College Inc

A fully accredited four year liberal arts college and academy for grades k-9.

Education

The Cambridge School

Operate a classical school from pre-K through 12th grade education.

Education

The Tampa Bay History Center

Discovering, preserving, and learning from our region's past to inform our common future.

Environment

University of South Florida Foundation Inc

To accept, invest and distribute private gifts in support of the university of south florida.

Education

Trinity College

Trinity is a comprehensive institution offering a broad range of educational programs that prepare students across the lifespan for the intellectual, ethical, and spiritual dimensions of contemporary work, civic and family life.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Frameworks of Tampa Bay Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Lawrenceville School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/33

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,532

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

32 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

32/32

Grantees still filing

23/32

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Education$101,200Other$80,140Arts & Culture$50,800Environment$12,750Recreation & Sports$12,500Philanthropy$10,950International$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vick Foundation IncCT16× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vick Foundation Inc · Ia Lenoir Charitable Tr · The William Stamps Farish Fund · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · Community Foundation · The Bruce a & Linda H Kenan Foundation · Sullivan Family Foundation · Sweet Peas Foundation · H L Thompson Jr Family Foundation · Howe Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation KRUSEN FAMILY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION CORP funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

12get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: AUCILLA RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~3 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 464882912 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on AUCILLA RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 5% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Krusen Family Charitable Foundation Corp?

Find your warmest path to Krusen Family Charitable Foundation Corp through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

KRUSEN FAMILY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION CORP

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

32 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Krusen Family Charitable Foundation Corp?

More from the funding graph

KRUSEN FAMILY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION CORP

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

32 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Krusen Family Charitable Foundation Corp?

More from the funding graph