Loading…
· Private foundation
PARR FAMILY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$113k
Granted FY2020
35
Grants
8
Communities
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0168% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2020.
Education$259kPhilanthropy$15kArts & Culture$2kHuman Services$2kEnvironment$700Crime & Legal$525Health$400Food & Nutrition$200Animals$25Other$132k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
morrismuseum
2019
morris
2020
food
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2020 · 35 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k34 grants · $13k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$100
Median grant
8
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
- THE HILL SCHOOL$100,000
- FOUNDATION FOR MORRISTOWN MEDICAL$4,075
- SAINT ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$1,000
- ENGLEWOOD COMMUNITY CLINIC$1,000
- FOUNDATION FOR BOCA GRANDE COMM CTR$1,000
- BOCA GRANDE WOMEN'S CLUB$800
- FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$525
- THIRTEEN$500
- WELLESLEY COLLEGE$500
- THE SEEING EYE$500
- NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO$500
- HOMELESS SOLUTIONS$500
- COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY$250
- WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$250
- AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION$150
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 4% — the area typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$405k · 50 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else
50 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2020, 22 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
50
27
Total granted
$405k
$4k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+21%
+42%
Still filing today
36%
30%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
EducationArts & CultureEnvironmentPhilanthropyCrime & LegalHealthOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- THTHE HILL SCHOOL4× · 2017–2020 · $250k · revenue +13%
- BGBOCA GRANDE HEALTH CLINIC FDN3× · 2017–2019 · $15k · revenue +163%
- WCWELLESLEY COLLEGE4× · 2017–2020 · $7k · revenue +43%
Funded once
- CFCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NJone grant, 2017 · $1k
- TMTHE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ARTone grant, 2017 · $600 · revenue +21%
- TETRINITY EPISCOPAL SCHOOLone grant, 2018 · $500
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
New York Academy of Sciences
To advance scientific knowledge and to increase the number of scientifically informed individuals.
—
2
New York University
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes.
Education
3
Westminster Foundation At Princeton Nj
—
4
The Frick Collection
The Frick Collection (the "Collection") operates an internationally recognized art museum and library program for the inspiration and enjoyment of the public and for the advancement of the study of fine arts and kindred subjects.
—
5
Mars Hill University
The organization is a private liberal arts univesrity offering programs leading to five degrees: bachelor of arts, science, music, social work and fine arts.
Education
6
New York Institute of Technology
We are committed to educating the next generation of leaders and inspiring innovation. (see sch o)
Education
7
The Wetlands Institute
The mission of the wetlands institute is to promote appreciation, understanding and stewardship of wetland and coastal ecosystems through programs in research, conservation and education.
—
8
Peace Islands Institute New York
Religion
9
Museum of Modern Art
The Museum of Modern Art connects people from around the world (Continued in Schedule O)
Arts & Culture
10
New York Medical College
Educate physicians, scientists, public health specialists & other healthcare professionals.
—
11
The Rockefeller University
A world-renowned center for research and graduate education.
Education
12
Monmouth College
To create and sustain an environment that is committed to liberal arts education.
Education
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Interfaith Food Pantry Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wellesley College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
Closures · last 5 years
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
orgs you fund
3%1/33
the rest of the field
8%
6,105/78,129
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
05the grantee network
31 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/31
Grantees still filing
23/31
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Education$258,500Other$132,248Philanthropy$15,150Arts & Culture$2,050Human Services$2,000Environment$700Crime & Legal$525
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE HILL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds BOCA GRANDE HEALTH CLINIC FDN ↗
- Who funds WELLESLEY COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds HOMELESS SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds THE SEEING EYE ↗
- Who funds WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO ↗
- Who funds THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE CHI PSI EDUCATIONAL TRUST ↗
- Who funds MORRIS MINUTE MEN ↗
- Who funds BOCA GRANDE HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds MORRIS COUNTY TOURISM BUREAU ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Community Foundation of New JerseyNJ18.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Mimi Washington Starrett Foundation · Fm Kirby Foundation Inc · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Atlantic Health System Inc Group Return · Investors Foundation Inc · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation PARR FAMILY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
- Nourishnj Inc — 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE HILL SCHOOL.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~7 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 231352647 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on THE HILL SCHOOL, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 7 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 0% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Parr Family Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Parr Family Charitable Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines