Skip to content
Krupa Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Krupa Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$93k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Youth Development$694kInternational$216kReligion$176kHuman Services$54kPhilanthropy$49kEducation$34kFood & Nutrition$12kHousing & Shelter$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $73k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DUKE UNIVERSITY$31,000
YUVA UNSTOPPABLE USA$25,000
HUMAN SERVICES FOUNDATION$16,850
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NW NC$6,000
WINSTON SALEM FOUNDATION$6,000
BETHESDA CENTER$1,000
SALVATION ARMY$1,000
CROSSNORE SCHOOL CHILDRENS HOME$1,000
COMMUNITY CARE CENTER$1,000
SHEPARDS CENTER$1,000
WINSTON SALEM RESCUE MISSION$1,000
CRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY$1,000
SENIOR SERVICES$1,000
VAISHNAV SAMAJ OF RTP$151
VALLABH PUSHTI SAMAJ OF CAROLINAS$151
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BETHESDA CENTER: $1k → 11%CRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY: $1k → 15%CRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY: $1k → 15%BETHESDA CENTER: $1k → 15%CRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY: $1k → 15%BETHESDA CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS: $1k → 15%CRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY: $1k → 15%BETHESDA CENTER FOR HOMELESS: $1k → 15%CRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of Krupa Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 23% of the giving stays in NC; by stated purpose, 0%.

Krupa Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 16 repeat orgs$83k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
7

Total granted

$1.1M
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+27%

Still filing today

75%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesInternationalHealthFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VU
    VYO USA INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $668k · revenue +426% · 31% of their budget
  • MS
    MUNI SEVA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION USA INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $170k · revenue +45%
  • VS
    VAISHNAV SAMAJ OF RTP INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $97k · revenue +251% · 25% of their budget

Funded once

  • SF
    SANSKRUTI FOUNDATION USA
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • TL
    TRUTH LOVE AND COMPANSSION
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
  • DUKE UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nirdosh Seva Foundation
Health
2
Govind Dham

Provide help to underprivileaged children

Unclassified
3
Sahayog Foundation
Community Improvement
4
Narayan Sewa Sansthan Inc

The organization is primarily engaged in providing funding for services in the fields of treatment and rehabilitation of persons afected by polio.

Human Services
5
Menno-Clinic India Inc

To provide health care services in india

Health
6
Vattikuti India Relief Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Sri Viswayogi Viswamjee Foundation for Universal Integration & Peace

To promote universal peace and universal integration

Religion
8
Narkar Health Foundation

Our mission is to provide quality, safe & comprehensive health care to those in need.

Health
9
Varasiddhi
Arts & Culture
10
Aryana Health Care Foundation

To provide necessary health care for uninsured individuals

Health
11
Sri Siddhi Vinayaka Temple of Nc

Religious activities and enhancing hindu religious culture

Religion
12
Samaritans International

Provide food relief to third world areas.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crisis Control Ministry Inc; the most unlike its peers is Vyo Usa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VYO USA INC: $668,204 · ReligionVYO USA INCVAISHNAV SAMAJ OF RTP INC: $97,159 · ReligionVAISHNAV SAMAJ OF RTP INC+1 more: $1,002 · ReligionMUNI SEVA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION USA INC: $170,000 · InternationalMUNI SEVA CHARITAB…ACUMEN FUND INC: $30,000 · InternationalACUMEN FUND INCVALLABH PUSHTI SAMAJ OF CAROLINAS: $71,600 · OtherVALLABH PUSHTI S…Human Service Foundation: $31,850 · OtherHuman Service Fo…DUKE UNIVERSITY: $31,000 · OtherDUKE UNIVERSITYSANSKRUTI FOUNDATION USA: $15,001 · OtherSANSKRUTI FOUNDA…+11 more: $34,551 · Other+11 moreThe Winston-Salem Foundation: $49,150 · PhilanthropyYuva Unstoppable USA Inc: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentSENIOR SERVICES INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesCRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesBethesda Center for the Homesless Inc: $4,000 · Human ServicesSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST NC INC: $12,000 · Food & Nutrition
Religion$766,365International$200,000Other$184,002Philanthropy$49,150Youth Development$25,000Human Services$15,000Food & Nutrition$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVYO USA INC: $668,204 over 4y, 31% of budgetMUNI SEVA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION USA INC: $170,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetVAISHNAV SAMAJ OF RTP INC: $97,159 over 5y, 25% of budgetThe Winston-Salem Foundation: $49,150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHuman Service Foundation: $31,850 over 3y, 26% of budgetACUMEN FUND INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYuva Unstoppable USA Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 79% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST NC INC: $12,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR SERVICES INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY CARE CENTER FOR FORSYTH COUNTY: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WINSTON-SALEM RESCUE MISSION INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBethesda Center for the Homesless Inc: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIVYAJYOT FOUNDATION INC: $1,002 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VYO USA INC ↗
  • Who funds MUNI SEVA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION USA INC ↗
  • Who funds VAISHNAV SAMAJ OF RTP INC ↗
  • Who funds The Winston-Salem Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Human Service Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ACUMEN FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Yuva Unstoppable USA Inc ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST NC INC ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CARE CENTER FOR FORSYTH COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds THE WINSTON-SALEM RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds Bethesda Center for the Homesless Inc ↗
  • Who funds CROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DIVYAJYOT FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Reynolds American Fou…Strickland Family Fou…Ta John W and Anna H …C Haley Foundation IncRichard Wood Averill …Flow Foundation IncShallow Ford Foundati…Forsyth Memorial Hosp…Reynolds Foundation 1…Second Harvest Food B…The Cannon Foundation…The Winston-Salem Fou…
Reynolds American FoundationNC17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Reynolds American Foundation · Strickland Family Foundation Cynthia a S Graham · Ta John W and Anna H Hanes Foundation · C Haley Foundation Inc · Richard Wood Averill Charitable Trust aka Richard Wood Averill Foundation · Flow Foundation Inc · Shallow Ford Foundation Inc · Forsyth Memorial Hospital Inc · Reynolds Foundation 186-8803582 · Second Harvest Food Bank of Northwest Nc Inc · The Cannon Foundation Inc · The Winston-Salem Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Krupa Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Krupa Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Krupa Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home